update schulte.org

[user/henk/docs/dnsbl_notes.git] / dnslists.otl

diff --git a/dnslists.otl b/dnslists.otl
index 243e1a00695327dbd2808025fb2ae9928ab444cb..066e25d80124c6a3347a1418e0c594983158c2da 100644 (file)
--- a/dnslists.otl
+++ b/dnslists.otl
@@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ TODO
                        changes to the CBL that occured in January 2021. In short, the CBL infrastructure was replaced by the Spamhaus XBL structure
        http://dnsbl.burnt-tech.com/
                domain is for sale
+       http://rbl.dns-servicios.com/rbl.php
+               website can not be found
 00_NEEDS_RECHECK
        https://antispam.imp.ch/
                no usage policy
@@ -305,6 +307,11 @@ TODO
                        seems a bit unstructured and not very well documented
                                I can’t be arsed to deal with confluence slowing my browser to a halt repeatedly and it’s really hard to navigate but there seems to be some information on https://docs.tornevall.net/display/TORNEVALL/Endpoint%3A+dnsbl+-+DNSBL+v5+with+API+v3
                        seems active
+               http://rbl.schulte.org/
+                       seems active
+                       listing policy seems to be: they received spam from an IP
+                       usage policy: Anyone can use this RBL list [sic]
+                       return codes: probably boolean, i.e. either listed or not
        00_E_PAID
        00_E_PRIVATE
                88.blacklist.zap
@@ -479,8 +486,11 @@ TODO
                        not explicitly mentioned but it’s 127.0.0.X where X is the class from https://dronebl.org/classes
        http://psbl.org/
                query zone: psbl.surriel.com
-       http://rbl.dns-servicios.com/rbl.php
-       http://rbl.schulte.org/
+               no usage policy, but seems implied that usage is free
+               listing policy
+                       no explicit, complete policy given but sending to spamtraps is mentioned to get you listed and seems the exclusive mechanism
+               return codes
+                       not documented, probably only boolean
        http://rbldata.interserver.net/
                may be dead: http://www.blalert.com/dnsbl/rbl.interserver.net
        http://relaytest.kundenserver.de/
@@ -504,7 +514,6 @@ TODO
        http://www.justspam.org/
        http://www.kempt.net/dnsbl/
        http://www.leadmon.net/spamguard/
-       http://www.rbl.jp/allrbl-e.html
        http://www.spamcop.net/
                good policy
                good reputation
@@ -512,13 +521,8 @@ TODO
                sensible policy
        http://www.srntools.com/blacklist/
        http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php
-       http://www.usenix.org.uk/content/rbl.html
-       http://zapbl.net/
        https://bl.konstant.no/
        https://choon.net/rbl.php
-       https://puck.nether.net/or/
-               might be good
-       https://rbl.foobar.hu/
        https://www.abuse.ch/
                https://www.abuse.ch/?tag=httpbl
        https://www.kisarbl.or.kr/
@@ -526,19 +530,13 @@ TODO
        https://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/dns.html
        http://mailspike.net/usage.html
                reputation-based
-       http://www.spamhauswhitelist.com/en/
-               policies for listing and usage on the website
        http://www.whitelisted.org/
                paid subscription
                policy on site
        https://puck.nether.net/or/
                policies on website
-       https://rbl.foobar.hu/
-               usage and listing policies on website
        http://www.isipp.com/email-accreditation/iadb-query-instruction/
                requires signup
-       https://choon.net/rbl.php
                not quite a usage policy, but seems ok
                strange split of ipv4 and ipv6
                seems dead?
-       https://www.dnswl.org/