-
-
-
-
-
-
-Network Working Group J. Oikarinen
-Request for Comments: 1459 D. Reed
- May 1993
-
-
- Internet Relay Chat Protocol
-
-Status of This Memo
-
- This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
- community. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
- Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol
- Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.
- Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
-
-Abstract
-
- The IRC protocol was developed over the last 4 years since it was
- first implemented as a means for users on a BBS to chat amongst
- themselves. Now it supports a world-wide network of servers and
- clients, and is stringing to cope with growth. Over the past 2 years,
- the average number of users connected to the main IRC network has
- grown by a factor of 10.
-
- The IRC protocol is a text-based protocol, with the simplest client
- being any socket program capable of connecting to the server.
-
-Table of Contents
-
- 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 4
- 1.1 Servers ................................................ 4
- 1.2 Clients ................................................ 5
- 1.2.1 Operators .......................................... 5
- 1.3 Channels ................................................ 5
- 1.3.1 Channel Operators .................................... 6
- 2. THE IRC SPECIFICATION ....................................... 7
- 2.1 Overview ................................................ 7
- 2.2 Character codes ......................................... 7
- 2.3 Messages ................................................ 7
- 2.3.1 Message format in 'pseudo' BNF .................... 8
- 2.4 Numeric replies ......................................... 10
- 3. IRC Concepts ................................................ 10
- 3.1 One-to-one communication ................................ 10
- 3.2 One-to-many ............................................. 11
- 3.2.1 To a list .......................................... 11
- 3.2.2 To a group (channel) ............................... 11
- 3.2.3 To a host/server mask .............................. 12
- 3.3 One to all .............................................. 12
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 1]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- 3.3.1 Client to Client ................................... 12
- 3.3.2 Clients to Server .................................. 12
- 3.3.3 Server to Server ................................... 12
- 4. MESSAGE DETAILS ............................................. 13
- 4.1 Connection Registration ................................. 13
- 4.1.1 Password message ................................... 14
- 4.1.2 Nickname message ................................... 14
- 4.1.3 User message ....................................... 15
- 4.1.4 Server message ..................................... 16
- 4.1.5 Operator message ................................... 17
- 4.1.6 Quit message ....................................... 17
- 4.1.7 Server Quit message ................................ 18
- 4.2 Channel operations ...................................... 19
- 4.2.1 Join message ....................................... 19
- 4.2.2 Part message ....................................... 20
- 4.2.3 Mode message ....................................... 21
- 4.2.3.1 Channel modes ................................. 21
- 4.2.3.2 User modes .................................... 22
- 4.2.4 Topic message ...................................... 23
- 4.2.5 Names message ...................................... 24
- 4.2.6 List message ....................................... 24
- 4.2.7 Invite message ..................................... 25
- 4.2.8 Kick message ....................................... 25
- 4.3 Server queries and commands ............................. 26
- 4.3.1 Version message .................................... 26
- 4.3.2 Stats message ...................................... 27
- 4.3.3 Links message ...................................... 28
- 4.3.4 Time message ....................................... 29
- 4.3.5 Connect message .................................... 29
- 4.3.6 Trace message ...................................... 30
- 4.3.7 Admin message ...................................... 31
- 4.3.8 Info message ....................................... 31
- 4.4 Sending messages ........................................ 32
- 4.4.1 Private messages ................................... 32
- 4.4.2 Notice messages .................................... 33
- 4.5 User-based queries ...................................... 33
- 4.5.1 Who query .......................................... 33
- 4.5.2 Whois query ........................................ 34
- 4.5.3 Whowas message ..................................... 35
- 4.6 Miscellaneous messages .................................. 35
- 4.6.1 Kill message ....................................... 36
- 4.6.2 Ping message ....................................... 37
- 4.6.3 Pong message ....................................... 37
- 4.6.4 Error message ...................................... 38
- 5. OPTIONAL MESSAGES ........................................... 38
- 5.1 Away message ............................................ 38
- 5.2 Rehash command .......................................... 39
- 5.3 Restart command ......................................... 39
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 2]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- 5.4 Summon message .......................................... 40
- 5.5 Users message ........................................... 40
- 5.6 Operwall command ........................................ 41
- 5.7 Userhost message ........................................ 42
- 5.8 Ison message ............................................ 42
- 6. REPLIES ..................................................... 43
- 6.1 Error Replies ........................................... 43
- 6.2 Command responses ....................................... 48
- 6.3 Reserved numerics ....................................... 56
- 7. Client and server authentication ............................ 56
- 8. Current Implementations Details ............................. 56
- 8.1 Network protocol: TCP ................................... 57
- 8.1.1 Support of Unix sockets ............................ 57
- 8.2 Command Parsing ......................................... 57
- 8.3 Message delivery ........................................ 57
- 8.4 Connection 'Liveness' ................................... 58
- 8.5 Establishing a server-client connection ................. 58
- 8.6 Establishing a server-server connection ................. 58
- 8.6.1 State information exchange when connecting ......... 59
- 8.7 Terminating server-client connections ................... 59
- 8.8 Terminating server-server connections ................... 59
- 8.9 Tracking nickname changes ............................... 60
- 8.10 Flood control of clients ............................... 60
- 8.11 Non-blocking lookups ................................... 61
- 8.11.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups ............................ 61
- 8.11.2 Username (Ident) lookups .......................... 61
- 8.12 Configuration file ..................................... 61
- 8.12.1 Allowing clients to connect ....................... 62
- 8.12.2 Operators ......................................... 62
- 8.12.3 Allowing servers to connect ....................... 62
- 8.12.4 Administrivia ..................................... 63
- 8.13 Channel membership ..................................... 63
- 9. Current problems ............................................ 63
- 9.1 Scalability ............................................. 63
- 9.2 Labels .................................................. 63
- 9.2.1 Nicknames .......................................... 63
- 9.2.2 Channels ........................................... 64
- 9.2.3 Servers ............................................ 64
- 9.3 Algorithms .............................................. 64
- 10. Support and availability ................................... 64
- 11. Security Considerations .................................... 65
- 12. Authors' Addresses ......................................... 65
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 3]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-1. INTRODUCTION
-
- The IRC (Internet Relay Chat) protocol has been designed over a
- number of years for use with text based conferencing. This document
- describes the current IRC protocol.
-
- The IRC protocol has been developed on systems using the TCP/IP
- network protocol, although there is no requirement that this remain
- the only sphere in which it operates.
-
- IRC itself is a teleconferencing system, which (through the use of
- the client-server model) is well-suited to running on many machines
- in a distributed fashion. A typical setup involves a single process
- (the server) forming a central point for clients (or other servers)
- to connect to, performing the required message delivery/multiplexing
- and other functions.
-
-1.1 Servers
-
- The server forms the backbone of IRC, providing a point to which
- clients may connect to to talk to each other, and a point for other
- servers to connect to, forming an IRC network. The only network
- configuration allowed for IRC servers is that of a spanning tree [see
- Fig. 1] where each server acts as a central node for the rest of the
- net it sees.
-
-
- [ Server 15 ] [ Server 13 ] [ Server 14]
- / \ /
- / \ /
- [ Server 11 ] ------ [ Server 1 ] [ Server 12]
- / \ /
- / \ /
- [ Server 2 ] [ Server 3 ]
- / \ \
- / \ \
- [ Server 4 ] [ Server 5 ] [ Server 6 ]
- / | \ /
- / | \ /
- / | \____ /
- / | \ /
- [ Server 7 ] [ Server 8 ] [ Server 9 ] [ Server 10 ]
-
- :
- [ etc. ]
- :
-
- [ Fig. 1. Format of IRC server network ]
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 4]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-1.2 Clients
-
- A client is anything connecting to a server that is not another
- server. Each client is distinguished from other clients by a unique
- nickname having a maximum length of nine (9) characters. See the
- protocol grammar rules for what may and may not be used in a
- nickname. In addition to the nickname, all servers must have the
- following information about all clients: the real name of the host
- that the client is running on, the username of the client on that
- host, and the server to which the client is connected.
-
-1.2.1 Operators
-
- To allow a reasonable amount of order to be kept within the IRC
- network, a special class of clients (operators) is allowed to perform
- general maintenance functions on the network. Although the powers
- granted to an operator can be considered as 'dangerous', they are
- nonetheless required. Operators should be able to perform basic
- network tasks such as disconnecting and reconnecting servers as
- needed to prevent long-term use of bad network routing. In
- recognition of this need, the protocol discussed herein provides for
- operators only to be able to perform such functions. See sections
- 4.1.7 (SQUIT) and 4.3.5 (CONNECT).
-
- A more controversial power of operators is the ability to remove a
- user from the connected network by 'force', i.e. operators are able
- to close the connection between any client and server. The
- justification for this is delicate since its abuse is both
- destructive and annoying. For further details on this type of
- action, see section 4.6.1 (KILL).
-
-1.3 Channels
-
- A channel is a named group of one or more clients which will all
- receive messages addressed to that channel. The channel is created
- implicitly when the first client joins it, and the channel ceases to
- exist when the last client leaves it. While channel exists, any
- client can reference the channel using the name of the channel.
-
- Channels names are strings (beginning with a '&' or '#' character) of
- length up to 200 characters. Apart from the the requirement that the
- first character being either '&' or '#'; the only restriction on a
- channel name is that it may not contain any spaces (' '), a control G
- (^G or ASCII 7), or a comma (',' which is used as a list item
- separator by the protocol).
-
- There are two types of channels allowed by this protocol. One is a
- distributed channel which is known to all the servers that are
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 5]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- connected to the network. These channels are marked by the first
- character being a only clients on the server where it exists may join
- it. These are distinguished by a leading '&' character. On top of
- these two types, there are the various channel modes available to
- alter the characteristics of individual channels. See section 4.2.3
- (MODE command) for more details on this.
-
- To create a new channel or become part of an existing channel, a user
- is required to JOIN the channel. If the channel doesn't exist prior
- to joining, the channel is created and the creating user becomes a
- channel operator. If the channel already exists, whether or not your
- request to JOIN that channel is honoured depends on the current modes
- of the channel. For example, if the channel is invite-only, (+i),
- then you may only join if invited. As part of the protocol, a user
- may be a part of several channels at once, but a limit of ten (10)
- channels is recommended as being ample for both experienced and
- novice users. See section 8.13 for more information on this.
-
- If the IRC network becomes disjoint because of a split between two
- servers, the channel on each side is only composed of those clients
- which are connected to servers on the respective sides of the split,
- possibly ceasing to exist on one side of the split. When the split
- is healed, the connecting servers announce to each other who they
- think is in each channel and the mode of that channel. If the
- channel exists on both sides, the JOINs and MODEs are interpreted in
- an inclusive manner so that both sides of the new connection will
- agree about which clients are in the channel and what modes the
- channel has.
-
-1.3.1 Channel Operators
-
- The channel operator (also referred to as a "chop" or "chanop") on a
- given channel is considered to 'own' that channel. In recognition of
- this status, channel operators are endowed with certain powers which
- enable them to keep control and some sort of sanity in their channel.
- As an owner of a channel, a channel operator is not required to have
- reasons for their actions, although if their actions are generally
- antisocial or otherwise abusive, it might be reasonable to ask an IRC
- operator to intervene, or for the usersjust leave and go elsewhere
- and form their own channel.
-
- The commands which may only be used by channel operators are:
-
- KICK - Eject a client from the channel
- MODE - Change the channel's mode
- INVITE - Invite a client to an invite-only channel (mode +i)
- TOPIC - Change the channel topic in a mode +t channel
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 6]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- A channel operator is identified by the '@' symbol next to their
- nickname whenever it is associated with a channel (ie replies to the
- NAMES, WHO and WHOIS commands).
-
-2. The IRC Specification
-
-2.1 Overview
-
- The protocol as described herein is for use both with server to
- server and client to server connections. There are, however, more
- restrictions on client connections (which are considered to be
- untrustworthy) than on server connections.
-
-2.2 Character codes
-
- No specific character set is specified. The protocol is based on a a
- set of codes which are composed of eight (8) bits, making up an
- octet. Each message may be composed of any number of these octets;
- however, some octet values are used for control codes which act as
- message delimiters.
-
- Regardless of being an 8-bit protocol, the delimiters and keywords
- are such that protocol is mostly usable from USASCII terminal and a
- telnet connection.
-
- Because of IRC's scandanavian origin, the characters {}| are
- considered to be the lower case equivalents of the characters []\,
- respectively. This is a critical issue when determining the
- equivalence of two nicknames.
-
-2.3 Messages
-
- Servers and clients send eachother messages which may or may not
- generate a reply. If the message contains a valid command, as
- described in later sections, the client should expect a reply as
- specified but it is not advised to wait forever for the reply; client
- to server and server to server communication is essentially
- asynchronous in nature.
-
- Each IRC message may consist of up to three main parts: the prefix
- (optional), the command, and the command parameters (of which there
- may be up to 15). The prefix, command, and all parameters are
- separated by one (or more) ASCII space character(s) (0x20).
-
- The presence of a prefix is indicated with a single leading ASCII
- colon character (':', 0x3b), which must be the first character of the
- message itself. There must be no gap (whitespace) between the colon
- and the prefix. The prefix is used by servers to indicate the true
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 7]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- origin of the message. If the prefix is missing from the message, it
- is assumed to have originated from the connection from which it was
- received. Clients should not use prefix when sending a message from
- themselves; if they use a prefix, the only valid prefix is the
- registered nickname associated with the client. If the source
- identified by the prefix cannot be found from the server's internal
- database, or if the source is registered from a different link than
- from which the message arrived, the server must ignore the message
- silently.
-
- The command must either be a valid IRC command or a three (3) digit
- number represented in ASCII text.
-
- IRC messages are always lines of characters terminated with a CR-LF
- (Carriage Return - Line Feed) pair, and these messages shall not
- exceed 512 characters in length, counting all characters including
- the trailing CR-LF. Thus, there are 510 characters maximum allowed
- for the command and its parameters. There is no provision for
- continuation message lines. See section 7 for more details about
- current implementations.
-
-2.3.1 Message format in 'pseudo' BNF
-
- The protocol messages must be extracted from the contiguous stream of
- octets. The current solution is to designate two characters, CR and
- LF, as message separators. Empty messages are silently ignored,
- which permits use of the sequence CR-LF between messages
- without extra problems.
-
- The extracted message is parsed into the components <prefix>,
- <command> and list of parameters matched either by <middle> or
- <trailing> components.
-
- The BNF representation for this is:
-
-
-<message> ::= [':' <prefix> <SPACE> ] <command> <params> <crlf>
-<prefix> ::= <servername> | <nick> [ '!' <user> ] [ '@' <host> ]
-<command> ::= <letter> { <letter> } | <number> <number> <number>
-<SPACE> ::= ' ' { ' ' }
-<params> ::= <SPACE> [ ':' <trailing> | <middle> <params> ]
-
-<middle> ::= <Any *non-empty* sequence of octets not including SPACE
- or NUL or CR or LF, the first of which may not be ':'>
-<trailing> ::= <Any, possibly *empty*, sequence of octets not including
- NUL or CR or LF>
-
-<crlf> ::= CR LF
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 8]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-NOTES:
-
- 1) <SPACE> is consists only of SPACE character(s) (0x20).
- Specially notice that TABULATION, and all other control
- characters are considered NON-WHITE-SPACE.
-
- 2) After extracting the parameter list, all parameters are equal,
- whether matched by <middle> or <trailing>. <Trailing> is just
- a syntactic trick to allow SPACE within parameter.
-
- 3) The fact that CR and LF cannot appear in parameter strings is
- just artifact of the message framing. This might change later.
-
- 4) The NUL character is not special in message framing, and
- basically could end up inside a parameter, but as it would
- cause extra complexities in normal C string handling. Therefore
- NUL is not allowed within messages.
-
- 5) The last parameter may be an empty string.
-
- 6) Use of the extended prefix (['!' <user> ] ['@' <host> ]) must
- not be used in server to server communications and is only
- intended for server to client messages in order to provide
- clients with more useful information about who a message is
- from without the need for additional queries.
-
- Most protocol messages specify additional semantics and syntax for
- the extracted parameter strings dictated by their position in the
- list. For example, many server commands will assume that the first
- parameter after the command is the list of targets, which can be
- described with:
-
- <target> ::= <to> [ "," <target> ]
- <to> ::= <channel> | <user> '@' <servername> | <nick> | <mask>
- <channel> ::= ('#' | '&') <chstring>
- <servername> ::= <host>
- <host> ::= see RFC 952 [DNS:4] for details on allowed hostnames
- <nick> ::= <letter> { <letter> | <number> | <special> }
- <mask> ::= ('#' | '$') <chstring>
- <chstring> ::= <any 8bit code except SPACE, BELL, NUL, CR, LF and
- comma (',')>
-
- Other parameter syntaxes are:
-
- <user> ::= <nonwhite> { <nonwhite> }
- <letter> ::= 'a' ... 'z' | 'A' ... 'Z'
- <number> ::= '0' ... '9'
- <special> ::= '-' | '[' | ']' | '\' | '`' | '^' | '{' | '}'
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 9]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- <nonwhite> ::= <any 8bit code except SPACE (0x20), NUL (0x0), CR
- (0xd), and LF (0xa)>
-
-2.4 Numeric replies
-
- Most of the messages sent to the server generate a reply of some
- sort. The most common reply is the numeric reply, used for both
- errors and normal replies. The numeric reply must be sent as one
- message consisting of the sender prefix, the three digit numeric, and
- the target of the reply. A numeric reply is not allowed to originate
- from a client; any such messages received by a server are silently
- dropped. In all other respects, a numeric reply is just like a normal
- message, except that the keyword is made up of 3 numeric digits
- rather than a string of letters. A list of different replies is
- supplied in section 6.
-
-3. IRC Concepts.
-
- This section is devoted to describing the actual concepts behind the
- organization of the IRC protocol and how the current
- implementations deliver different classes of messages.
-
-
-
- 1--\
- A D---4
- 2--/ \ /
- B----C
- / \
- 3 E
-
- Servers: A, B, C, D, E Clients: 1, 2, 3, 4
-
- [ Fig. 2. Sample small IRC network ]
-
-3.1 One-to-one communication
-
- Communication on a one-to-one basis is usually only performed by
- clients, since most server-server traffic is not a result of servers
- talking only to each other. To provide a secure means for clients to
- talk to each other, it is required that all servers be able to send a
- message in exactly one direction along the spanning tree in order to
- reach any client. The path of a message being delivered is the
- shortest path between any two points on the spanning tree.
-
- The following examples all refer to Figure 2 above.
-
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 10]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-Example 1:
- A message between clients 1 and 2 is only seen by server A, which
- sends it straight to client 2.
-
-Example 2:
- A message between clients 1 and 3 is seen by servers A & B, and
- client 3. No other clients or servers are allowed see the message.
-
-Example 3:
- A message between clients 2 and 4 is seen by servers A, B, C & D
- and client 4 only.
-
-3.2 One-to-many
-
- The main goal of IRC is to provide a forum which allows easy and
- efficient conferencing (one to many conversations). IRC offers
- several means to achieve this, each serving its own purpose.
-
-3.2.1 To a list
-
- The least efficient style of one-to-many conversation is through
- clients talking to a 'list' of users. How this is done is almost
- self explanatory: the client gives a list of destinations to which
- the message is to be delivered and the server breaks it up and
- dispatches a separate copy of the message to each given destination.
- This isn't as efficient as using a group since the destination list
- is broken up and the dispatch sent without checking to make sure
- duplicates aren't sent down each path.
-
-3.2.2 To a group (channel)
-
- In IRC the channel has a role equivalent to that of the multicast
- group; their existence is dynamic (coming and going as people join
- and leave channels) and the actual conversation carried out on a
- channel is only sent to servers which are supporting users on a given
- channel. If there are multiple users on a server in the same
- channel, the message text is sent only once to that server and then
- sent to each client on the channel. This action is then repeated for
- each client-server combination until the original message has fanned
- out and reached each member of the channel.
-
- The following examples all refer to Figure 2.
-
-Example 4:
- Any channel with 1 client in it. Messages to the channel go to the
- server and then nowhere else.
-
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 11]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-Example 5:
- 2 clients in a channel. All messages traverse a path as if they
- were private messages between the two clients outside a channel.
-
-Example 6:
- Clients 1, 2 and 3 in a channel. All messages to the channel are
- sent to all clients and only those servers which must be traversed
- by the message if it were a private message to a single client. If
- client 1 sends a message, it goes back to client 2 and then via
- server B to client 3.
-
-3.2.3 To a host/server mask
-
- To provide IRC operators with some mechanism to send messages to a
- large body of related users, host and server mask messages are
- provided. These messages are sent to users whose host or server
- information match that of the mask. The messages are only sent to
- locations where users are, in a fashion similar to that of channels.
-
-3.3 One-to-all
-
- The one-to-all type of message is better described as a broadcast
- message, sent to all clients or servers or both. On a large network
- of users and servers, a single message can result in a lot of traffic
- being sent over the network in an effort to reach all of the desired
- destinations.
-
- For some messages, there is no option but to broadcast it to all
- servers so that the state information held by each server is
- reasonably consistent between servers.
-
-3.3.1 Client-to-Client
-
- There is no class of message which, from a single message, results in
- a message being sent to every other client.
-
-3.3.2 Client-to-Server
-
- Most of the commands which result in a change of state information
- (such as channel membership, channel mode, user status, etc) must be
- sent to all servers by default, and this distribution may not be
- changed by the client.
-
-3.3.3 Server-to-Server.
-
- While most messages between servers are distributed to all 'other'
- servers, this is only required for any message that affects either a
- user, channel or server. Since these are the basic items found in
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 12]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- IRC, nearly all messages originating from a server are broadcast to
- all other connected servers.
-
-4. Message details
-
- On the following pages are descriptions of each message recognized by
- the IRC server and client. All commands described in this section
- must be implemented by any server for this protocol.
-
- Where the reply ERR_NOSUCHSERVER is listed, it means that the
- <server> parameter could not be found. The server must not send any
- other replies after this for that command.
-
- The server to which a client is connected is required to parse the
- complete message, returning any appropriate errors. If the server
- encounters a fatal error while parsing a message, an error must be
- sent back to the client and the parsing terminated. A fatal error
- may be considered to be incorrect command, a destination which is
- otherwise unknown to the server (server, nick or channel names fit
- this category), not enough parameters or incorrect privileges.
-
- If a full set of parameters is presented, then each must be checked
- for validity and appropriate responses sent back to the client. In
- the case of messages which use parameter lists using the comma as an
- item separator, a reply must be sent for each item.
-
- In the examples below, some messages appear using the full format:
-
- :Name COMMAND parameter list
-
- Such examples represent a message from "Name" in transit between
- servers, where it is essential to include the name of the original
- sender of the message so remote servers may send back a reply along
- the correct path.
-
-4.1 Connection Registration
-
- The commands described here are used to register a connection with an
- IRC server as either a user or a server as well as correctly
- disconnect.
-
- A "PASS" command is not required for either client or server
- connection to be registered, but it must precede the server message
- or the latter of the NICK/USER combination. It is strongly
- recommended that all server connections have a password in order to
- give some level of security to the actual connections. The
- recommended order for a client to register is as follows:
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 13]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- 1. Pass message
- 2. Nick message
- 3. User message
-
-4.1.1 Password message
-
-
- Command: PASS
- Parameters: <password>
-
- The PASS command is used to set a 'connection password'. The
- password can and must be set before any attempt to register the
- connection is made. Currently this requires that clients send a PASS
- command before sending the NICK/USER combination and servers *must*
- send a PASS command before any SERVER command. The password supplied
- must match the one contained in the C/N lines (for servers) or I
- lines (for clients). It is possible to send multiple PASS commands
- before registering but only the last one sent is used for
- verification and it may not be changed once registered. Numeric
- Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED
-
- Example:
-
- PASS secretpasswordhere
-
-4.1.2 Nick message
-
- Command: NICK
- Parameters: <nickname> [ <hopcount> ]
-
- NICK message is used to give user a nickname or change the previous
- one. The <hopcount> parameter is only used by servers to indicate
- how far away a nick is from its home server. A local connection has
- a hopcount of 0. If supplied by a client, it must be ignored.
-
- If a NICK message arrives at a server which already knows about an
- identical nickname for another client, a nickname collision occurs.
- As a result of a nickname collision, all instances of the nickname
- are removed from the server's database, and a KILL command is issued
- to remove the nickname from all other server's database. If the NICK
- message causing the collision was a nickname change, then the
- original (old) nick must be removed as well.
-
- If the server recieves an identical NICK from a client which is
- directly connected, it may issue an ERR_NICKCOLLISION to the local
- client, drop the NICK command, and not generate any kills.
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 14]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME
- ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE ERR_NICKCOLLISION
-
- Example:
-
- NICK Wiz ; Introducing new nick "Wiz".
-
- :WiZ NICK Kilroy ; WiZ changed his nickname to Kilroy.
-
-4.1.3 User message
-
- Command: USER
- Parameters: <username> <hostname> <servername> <realname>
-
- The USER message is used at the beginning of connection to specify
- the username, hostname, servername and realname of s new user. It is
- also used in communication between servers to indicate new user
- arriving on IRC, since only after both USER and NICK have been
- received from a client does a user become registered.
-
- Between servers USER must to be prefixed with client's NICKname.
- Note that hostname and servername are normally ignored by the IRC
- server when the USER command comes from a directly connected client
- (for security reasons), but they are used in server to server
- communication. This means that a NICK must always be sent to a
- remote server when a new user is being introduced to the rest of the
- network before the accompanying USER is sent.
-
- It must be noted that realname parameter must be the last parameter,
- because it may contain space characters and must be prefixed with a
- colon (':') to make sure this is recognised as such.
-
- Since it is easy for a client to lie about its username by relying
- solely on the USER message, the use of an "Identity Server" is
- recommended. If the host which a user connects from has such a
- server enabled the username is set to that as in the reply from the
- "Identity Server".
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED
-
- Examples:
-
-
- USER guest tolmoon tolsun :Ronnie Reagan
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 15]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- ; User registering themselves with a
- username of "guest" and real name
- "Ronnie Reagan".
-
-
- :testnick USER guest tolmoon tolsun :Ronnie Reagan
- ; message between servers with the
- nickname for which the USER command
- belongs to
-
-4.1.4 Server message
-
- Command: SERVER
- Parameters: <servername> <hopcount> <info>
-
- The server message is used to tell a server that the other end of a
- new connection is a server. This message is also used to pass server
- data over whole net. When a new server is connected to net,
- information about it be broadcast to the whole network. <hopcount>
- is used to give all servers some internal information on how far away
- all servers are. With a full server list, it would be possible to
- construct a map of the entire server tree, but hostmasks prevent this
- from being done.
-
- The SERVER message must only be accepted from either (a) a connection
- which is yet to be registered and is attempting to register as a
- server, or (b) an existing connection to another server, in which
- case the SERVER message is introducing a new server behind that
- server.
-
- Most errors that occur with the receipt of a SERVER command result in
- the connection being terminated by the destination host (target
- SERVER). Error replies are usually sent using the "ERROR" command
- rather than the numeric since the ERROR command has several useful
- properties which make it useful here.
-
- If a SERVER message is parsed and attempts to introduce a server
- which is already known to the receiving server, the connection from
- which that message must be closed (following the correct procedures),
- since a duplicate route to a server has formed and the acyclic nature
- of the IRC tree broken.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED
-
- Example:
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 16]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-SERVER test.oulu.fi 1 :[tolsun.oulu.fi] Experimental server
- ; New server test.oulu.fi introducing
- itself and attempting to register. The
- name in []'s is the hostname for the
- host running test.oulu.fi.
-
-
-:tolsun.oulu.fi SERVER csd.bu.edu 5 :BU Central Server
- ; Server tolsun.oulu.fi is our uplink
- for csd.bu.edu which is 5 hops away.
-
-4.1.5 Oper
-
- Command: OPER
- Parameters: <user> <password>
-
- OPER message is used by a normal user to obtain operator privileges.
- The combination of <user> and <password> are required to gain
- Operator privileges.
-
- If the client sending the OPER command supplies the correct password
- for the given user, the server then informs the rest of the network
- of the new operator by issuing a "MODE +o" for the clients nickname.
-
- The OPER message is client-server only.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS RPL_YOUREOPER
- ERR_NOOPERHOST ERR_PASSWDMISMATCH
-
- Example:
-
- OPER foo bar ; Attempt to register as an operator
- using a username of "foo" and "bar" as
- the password.
-
-4.1.6 Quit
-
- Command: QUIT
- Parameters: [<Quit message>]
-
- A client session is ended with a quit message. The server must close
- the connection to a client which sends a QUIT message. If a "Quit
- Message" is given, this will be sent instead of the default message,
- the nickname.
-
- When netsplits (disconnecting of two servers) occur, the quit message
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 17]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- is composed of the names of two servers involved, separated by a
- space. The first name is that of the server which is still connected
- and the second name is that of the server that has become
- disconnected.
-
- If, for some other reason, a client connection is closed without the
- client issuing a QUIT command (e.g. client dies and EOF occurs
- on socket), the server is required to fill in the quit message with
- some sort of message reflecting the nature of the event which
- caused it to happen.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- None.
-
- Examples:
-
- QUIT :Gone to have lunch ; Preferred message format.
-
-4.1.7 Server quit message
-
- Command: SQUIT
- Parameters: <server> <comment>
-
- The SQUIT message is needed to tell about quitting or dead servers.
- If a server wishes to break the connection to another server it must
- send a SQUIT message to the other server, using the the name of the
- other server as the server parameter, which then closes its
- connection to the quitting server.
-
- This command is also available operators to help keep a network of
- IRC servers connected in an orderly fashion. Operators may also
- issue an SQUIT message for a remote server connection. In this case,
- the SQUIT must be parsed by each server inbetween the operator and
- the remote server, updating the view of the network held by each
- server as explained below.
-
- The <comment> should be supplied by all operators who execute a SQUIT
- for a remote server (that is not connected to the server they are
- currently on) so that other operators are aware for the reason of
- this action. The <comment> is also filled in by servers which may
- place an error or similar message here.
-
- Both of the servers which are on either side of the connection being
- closed are required to to send out a SQUIT message (to all its other
- server connections) for all other servers which are considered to be
- behind that link.
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 18]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- Similarly, a QUIT message must be sent to the other connected servers
- rest of the network on behalf of all clients behind that link. In
- addition to this, all channel members of a channel which lost a
- member due to the split must be sent a QUIT message.
-
- If a server connection is terminated prematurely (e.g. the server on
- the other end of the link died), the server which detects
- this disconnection is required to inform the rest of the network
- that the connection has closed and fill in the comment field
- with something appropriate.
-
- Numeric replies:
-
- ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
-
- Example:
-
- SQUIT tolsun.oulu.fi :Bad Link ? ; the server link tolson.oulu.fi has
- been terminated because of "Bad Link".
-
- :Trillian SQUIT cm22.eng.umd.edu :Server out of control
- ; message from Trillian to disconnect
- "cm22.eng.umd.edu" from the net
- because "Server out of control".
-
-4.2 Channel operations
-
- This group of messages is concerned with manipulating channels, their
- properties (channel modes), and their contents (typically clients).
- In implementing these, a number of race conditions are inevitable
- when clients at opposing ends of a network send commands which will
- ultimately clash. It is also required that servers keep a nickname
- history to ensure that wherever a <nick> parameter is given, the
- server check its history in case it has recently been changed.
-
-4.2.1 Join message
-
- Command: JOIN
- Parameters: <channel>{,<channel>} [<key>{,<key>}]
-
- The JOIN command is used by client to start listening a specific
- channel. Whether or not a client is allowed to join a channel is
- checked only by the server the client is connected to; all other
- servers automatically add the user to the channel when it is received
- from other servers. The conditions which affect this are as follows:
-
- 1. the user must be invited if the channel is invite-only;
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 19]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- 2. the user's nick/username/hostname must not match any
- active bans;
-
- 3. the correct key (password) must be given if it is set.
-
- These are discussed in more detail under the MODE command (see
- section 4.2.3 for more details).
-
- Once a user has joined a channel, they receive notice about all
- commands their server receives which affect the channel. This
- includes MODE, KICK, PART, QUIT and of course PRIVMSG/NOTICE. The
- JOIN command needs to be broadcast to all servers so that each server
- knows where to find the users who are on the channel. This allows
- optimal delivery of PRIVMSG/NOTICE messages to the channel.
-
- If a JOIN is successful, the user is then sent the channel's topic
- (using RPL_TOPIC) and the list of users who are on the channel (using
- RPL_NAMREPLY), which must include the user joining.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN
- ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN ERR_BADCHANNELKEY
- ERR_CHANNELISFULL ERR_BADCHANMASK
- ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS
- RPL_TOPIC
-
- Examples:
-
- JOIN #foobar ; join channel #foobar.
-
- JOIN &foo fubar ; join channel &foo using key "fubar".
-
- JOIN #foo,&bar fubar ; join channel #foo using key "fubar"
- and &bar using no key.
-
- JOIN #foo,#bar fubar,foobar ; join channel #foo using key "fubar".
- and channel #bar using key "foobar".
-
- JOIN #foo,#bar ; join channels #foo and #bar.
-
- :WiZ JOIN #Twilight_zone ; JOIN message from WiZ
-
-4.2.2 Part message
-
- Command: PART
- Parameters: <channel>{,<channel>}
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 20]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- The PART message causes the client sending the message to be removed
- from the list of active users for all given channels listed in the
- parameter string.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL
- ERR_NOTONCHANNEL
-
- Examples:
-
- PART #twilight_zone ; leave channel "#twilight_zone"
-
- PART #oz-ops,&group5 ; leave both channels "&group5" and
- "#oz-ops".
-
-4.2.3 Mode message
-
- Command: MODE
-
- The MODE command is a dual-purpose command in IRC. It allows both
- usernames and channels to have their mode changed. The rationale for
- this choice is that one day nicknames will be obsolete and the
- equivalent property will be the channel.
-
- When parsing MODE messages, it is recommended that the entire message
- be parsed first and then the changes which resulted then passed on.
-
-4.2.3.1 Channel modes
-
- Parameters: <channel> {[+|-]|o|p|s|i|t|n|b|v} [<limit>] [<user>]
- [<ban mask>]
-
- The MODE command is provided so that channel operators may change the
- characteristics of `their' channel. It is also required that servers
- be able to change channel modes so that channel operators may be
- created.
-
- The various modes available for channels are as follows:
-
- o - give/take channel operator privileges;
- p - private channel flag;
- s - secret channel flag;
- i - invite-only channel flag;
- t - topic settable by channel operator only flag;
- n - no messages to channel from clients on the outside;
- m - moderated channel;
- l - set the user limit to channel;
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 21]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- b - set a ban mask to keep users out;
- v - give/take the ability to speak on a moderated channel;
- k - set a channel key (password).
-
- When using the 'o' and 'b' options, a restriction on a total of three
- per mode command has been imposed. That is, any combination of 'o'
- and
-
-4.2.3.2 User modes
-
- Parameters: <nickname> {[+|-]|i|w|s|o}
-
- The user MODEs are typically changes which affect either how the
- client is seen by others or what 'extra' messages the client is sent.
- A user MODE command may only be accepted if both the sender of the
- message and the nickname given as a parameter are both the same.
-
- The available modes are as follows:
-
- i - marks a users as invisible;
- s - marks a user for receipt of server notices;
- w - user receives wallops;
- o - operator flag.
-
- Additional modes may be available later on.
-
- If a user attempts to make themselves an operator using the "+o"
- flag, the attempt should be ignored. There is no restriction,
- however, on anyone `deopping' themselves (using "-o"). Numeric
- Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS RPL_CHANNELMODEIS
- ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED ERR_NOSUCHNICK
- ERR_NOTONCHANNEL ERR_KEYSET
- RPL_BANLIST RPL_ENDOFBANLIST
- ERR_UNKNOWNMODE ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL
-
- ERR_USERSDONTMATCH RPL_UMODEIS
- ERR_UMODEUNKNOWNFLAG
-
- Examples:
-
- Use of Channel Modes:
-
-MODE #Finnish +im ; Makes #Finnish channel moderated and
- 'invite-only'.
-
-MODE #Finnish +o Kilroy ; Gives 'chanop' privileges to Kilroy on
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 22]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- channel #Finnish.
-
-MODE #Finnish +v Wiz ; Allow WiZ to speak on #Finnish.
-
-MODE #Fins -s ; Removes 'secret' flag from channel
- #Fins.
-
-MODE #42 +k oulu ; Set the channel key to "oulu".
-
-MODE #eu-opers +l 10 ; Set the limit for the number of users
- on channel to 10.
-
-MODE &oulu +b ; list ban masks set for channel.
-
-MODE &oulu +b *!*@* ; prevent all users from joining.
-
-MODE &oulu +b *!*@*.edu ; prevent any user from a hostname
- matching *.edu from joining.
-
- Use of user Modes:
-
-:MODE WiZ -w ; turns reception of WALLOPS messages
- off for WiZ.
-
-:Angel MODE Angel +i ; Message from Angel to make themselves
- invisible.
-
-MODE WiZ -o ; WiZ 'deopping' (removing operator
- status). The plain reverse of this
- command ("MODE WiZ +o") must not be
- allowed from users since would bypass
- the OPER command.
-
-4.2.4 Topic message
-
- Command: TOPIC
- Parameters: <channel> [<topic>]
-
- The TOPIC message is used to change or view the topic of a channel.
- The topic for channel <channel> is returned if there is no <topic>
- given. If the <topic> parameter is present, the topic for that
- channel will be changed, if the channel modes permit this action.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOTONCHANNEL
- RPL_NOTOPIC RPL_TOPIC
- ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 23]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- Examples:
-
- :Wiz TOPIC #test :New topic ;User Wiz setting the topic.
-
- TOPIC #test :another topic ;set the topic on #test to "another
- topic".
-
- TOPIC #test ; check the topic for #test.
-
-4.2.5 Names message
-
- Command: NAMES
- Parameters: [<channel>{,<channel>}]
-
- By using the NAMES command, a user can list all nicknames that are
- visible to them on any channel that they can see. Channel names
- which they can see are those which aren't private (+p) or secret (+s)
- or those which they are actually on. The <channel> parameter
- specifies which channel(s) to return information about if valid.
- There is no error reply for bad channel names.
-
- If no <channel> parameter is given, a list of all channels and their
- occupants is returned. At the end of this list, a list of users who
- are visible but either not on any channel or not on a visible channel
- are listed as being on `channel' "*".
-
- Numerics:
-
- RPL_NAMREPLY RPL_ENDOFNAMES
-
- Examples:
-
- NAMES #twilight_zone,#42 ; list visible users on #twilight_zone
- and #42 if the channels are visible to
- you.
-
- NAMES ; list all visible channels and users
-
-4.2.6 List message
-
- Command: LIST
- Parameters: [<channel>{,<channel>} [<server>]]
-
- The list message is used to list channels and their topics. If the
- <channel> parameter is used, only the status of that channel
- is displayed. Private channels are listed (without their
- topics) as channel "Prv" unless the client generating the query is
- actually on that channel. Likewise, secret channels are not listed
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 24]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- at all unless the client is a member of the channel in question.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_LISTSTART
- RPL_LIST RPL_LISTEND
-
- Examples:
-
- LIST ; List all channels.
-
- LIST #twilight_zone,#42 ; List channels #twilight_zone and #42
-
-4.2.7 Invite message
-
- Command: INVITE
- Parameters: <nickname> <channel>
-
- The INVITE message is used to invite users to a channel. The
- parameter <nickname> is the nickname of the person to be invited to
- the target channel <channel>. There is no requirement that the
- channel the target user is being invited to must exist or be a valid
- channel. To invite a user to a channel which is invite only (MODE
- +i), the client sending the invite must be recognised as being a
- channel operator on the given channel.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHNICK
- ERR_NOTONCHANNEL ERR_USERONCHANNEL
- ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED
- RPL_INVITING RPL_AWAY
-
- Examples:
-
- :Angel INVITE Wiz #Dust ; User Angel inviting WiZ to channel
- #Dust
-
- INVITE Wiz #Twilight_Zone ; Command to invite WiZ to
- #Twilight_zone
-
-4.2.8 Kick command
-
- Command: KICK
- Parameters: <channel> <user> [<comment>]
-
- The KICK command can be used to forcibly remove a user from a
- channel. It 'kicks them out' of the channel (forced PART).
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 25]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- Only a channel operator may kick another user out of a channel.
- Each server that receives a KICK message checks that it is valid
- (ie the sender is actually a channel operator) before removing
- the victim from the channel.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL
- ERR_BADCHANMASK ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED
- ERR_NOTONCHANNEL
-
- Examples:
-
-KICK &Melbourne Matthew ; Kick Matthew from &Melbourne
-
-KICK #Finnish John :Speaking English
- ; Kick John from #Finnish using
- "Speaking English" as the reason
- (comment).
-
-:WiZ KICK #Finnish John ; KICK message from WiZ to remove John
- from channel #Finnish
-
-NOTE:
- It is possible to extend the KICK command parameters to the
-following:
-
-<channel>{,<channel>} <user>{,<user>} [<comment>]
-
-4.3 Server queries and commands
-
- The server query group of commands has been designed to return
- information about any server which is connected to the network. All
- servers connected must respond to these queries and respond
- correctly. Any invalid response (or lack thereof) must be considered
- a sign of a broken server and it must be disconnected/disabled as
- soon as possible until the situation is remedied.
-
- In these queries, where a parameter appears as "<server>", it will
- usually mean it can be a nickname or a server or a wildcard name of
- some sort. For each parameter, however, only one query and set of
- replies is to be generated.
-
-4.3.1 Version message
-
- Command: VERSION
- Parameters: [<server>]
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 26]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- The VERSION message is used to query the version of the server
- program. An optional parameter <server> is used to query the version
- of the server program which a client is not directly connected to.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_VERSION
-
- Examples:
-
- :Wiz VERSION *.se ; message from Wiz to check the version
- of a server matching "*.se"
-
- VERSION tolsun.oulu.fi ; check the version of server
- "tolsun.oulu.fi".
-
-4.3.2 Stats message
-
- Command: STATS
- Parameters: [<query> [<server>]]
-
- The stats message is used to query statistics of certain server. If
- <server> parameter is omitted, only the end of stats reply is sent
- back. The implementation of this command is highly dependent on the
- server which replies, although the server must be able to supply
- information as described by the queries below (or similar).
-
- A query may be given by any single letter which is only checked by
- the destination server (if given as the <server> parameter) and is
- otherwise passed on by intermediate servers, ignored and unaltered.
- The following queries are those found in the current IRC
- implementation and provide a large portion of the setup information
- for that server. Although these may not be supported in the same way
- by other versions, all servers should be able to supply a valid reply
- to a STATS query which is consistent with the reply formats currently
- used and the purpose of the query.
-
- The currently supported queries are:
-
- c - returns a list of servers which the server may connect
- to or allow connections from;
- h - returns a list of servers which are either forced to be
- treated as leaves or allowed to act as hubs;
- i - returns a list of hosts which the server allows a client
- to connect from;
- k - returns a list of banned username/hostname combinations
- for that server;
- l - returns a list of the server's connections, showing how
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 27]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- long each connection has been established and the traffic
- over that connection in bytes and messages for each
- direction;
- m - returns a list of commands supported by the server and
- the usage count for each if the usage count is non zero;
- o - returns a list of hosts from which normal clients may
- become operators;
- y - show Y (Class) lines from server's configuration file;
- u - returns a string showing how long the server has been up.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
- RPL_STATSCLINE RPL_STATSNLINE
- RPL_STATSILINE RPL_STATSKLINE
- RPL_STATSQLINE RPL_STATSLLINE
- RPL_STATSLINKINFO RPL_STATSUPTIME
- RPL_STATSCOMMANDS RPL_STATSOLINE
- RPL_STATSHLINE RPL_ENDOFSTATS
-
- Examples:
-
-STATS m ; check the command usage for the server
- you are connected to
-
-:Wiz STATS c eff.org ; request by WiZ for C/N line
- information from server eff.org
-
-4.3.3 Links message
-
- Command: LINKS
- Parameters: [[<remote server>] <server mask>]
-
- With LINKS, a user can list all servers which are known by the server
- answering the query. The returned list of servers must match the
- mask, or if no mask is given, the full list is returned.
-
- If <remote server> is given in addition to <server mask>, the LINKS
- command is forwarded to the first server found that matches that name
- (if any), and that server is then required to answer the query.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
- RPL_LINKS RPL_ENDOFLINKS
-
- Examples:
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 28]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-LINKS *.au ; list all servers which have a name
- that matches *.au;
-
-:WiZ LINKS *.bu.edu *.edu ; LINKS message from WiZ to the first
- server matching *.edu for a list of
- servers matching *.bu.edu.
-
-4.3.4 Time message
-
- Command: TIME
- Parameters: [<server>]
-
- The time message is used to query local time from the specified
- server. If the server parameter is not given, the server handling the
- command must reply to the query.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_TIME
-
- Examples:
-
- TIME tolsun.oulu.fi ; check the time on the server
- "tolson.oulu.fi"
-
- Angel TIME *.au ; user angel checking the time on a
- server matching "*.au"
-
-4.3.5 Connect message
-
- Command: CONNECT
- Parameters: <target server> [<port> [<remote server>]]
-
- The CONNECT command can be used to force a server to try to establish
- a new connection to another server immediately. CONNECT is a
- privileged command and is to be available only to IRC Operators. If
- a remote server is given then the CONNECT attempt is made by that
- server to <target server> and <port>.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_NOPRIVILEGES
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
-
- Examples:
-
-CONNECT tolsun.oulu.fi ; Attempt to connect a server to
- tolsun.oulu.fi
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 29]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-:WiZ CONNECT eff.org 6667 csd.bu.edu
- ; CONNECT attempt by WiZ to get servers
- eff.org and csd.bu.edu connected on port
- 6667.
-
-4.3.6 Trace message
-
- Command: TRACE
- Parameters: [<server>]
-
- TRACE command is used to find the route to specific server. Each
- server that processes this message must tell the sender about it by
- sending a reply indicating it is a pass-through link, forming a chain
- of replies similar to that gained from using "traceroute". After
- sending this reply back, it must then send the TRACE message to the
- next server until given server is reached. If the <server> parameter
- is omitted, it is recommended that TRACE command send a message to
- the sender telling which servers the current server has direct
- connection to.
-
- If the destination given by "<server>" is an actual server, then the
- destination server is required to report all servers and users which
- are connected to it, although only operators are permitted to see
- users present. If the destination given by <server> is a nickname,
- they only a reply for that nickname is given.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
-
- If the TRACE message is destined for another server, all intermediate
- servers must return a RPL_TRACELINK reply to indicate that the TRACE
- passed through it and where its going next.
-
- RPL_TRACELINK
- A TRACE reply may be composed of any number of the following numeric
- replies.
-
- RPL_TRACECONNECTING RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE
- RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN RPL_TRACEOPERATOR
- RPL_TRACEUSER RPL_TRACESERVER
- RPL_TRACESERVICE RPL_TRACENEWTYPE
- RPL_TRACECLASS
-
- Examples:
-
-TRACE *.oulu.fi ; TRACE to a server matching *.oulu.fi
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 30]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-:WiZ TRACE AngelDust ; TRACE issued by WiZ to nick AngelDust
-
-4.3.7 Admin command
-
- Command: ADMIN
- Parameters: [<server>]
-
- The admin message is used to find the name of the administrator of
- the given server, or current server if <server> parameter is omitted.
- Each server must have the ability to forward ADMIN messages to other
- servers.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
- RPL_ADMINME RPL_ADMINLOC1
- RPL_ADMINLOC2 RPL_ADMINEMAIL
-
- Examples:
-
- ADMIN tolsun.oulu.fi ; request an ADMIN reply from
- tolsun.oulu.fi
-
- :WiZ ADMIN *.edu ; ADMIN request from WiZ for first
- server found to match *.edu.
-
-4.3.8 Info command
-
- Command: INFO
- Parameters: [<server>]
-
- The INFO command is required to return information which describes
- the server: its version, when it was compiled, the patchlevel, when
- it was started, and any other miscellaneous information which may be
- considered to be relevant.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
- RPL_INFO RPL_ENDOFINFO
-
- Examples:
-
- INFO csd.bu.edu ; request an INFO reply from
- csd.bu.edu
-
- :Avalon INFO *.fi ; INFO request from Avalon for first
- server found to match *.fi.
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 31]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- INFO Angel ; request info from the server that
- Angel is connected to.
-
-4.4 Sending messages
-
- The main purpose of the IRC protocol is to provide a base for clients
- to communicate with each other. PRIVMSG and NOTICE are the only
- messages available which actually perform delivery of a text message
- from one client to another - the rest just make it possible and try
- to ensure it happens in a reliable and structured manner.
-
-4.4.1 Private messages
-
- Command: PRIVMSG
- Parameters: <receiver>{,<receiver>} <text to be sent>
-
- PRIVMSG is used to send private messages between users. <receiver>
- is the nickname of the receiver of the message. <receiver> can also
- be a list of names or channels separated with commas.
-
- The <receiver> parameter may also me a host mask (#mask) or server
- mask ($mask). In both cases the server will only send the PRIVMSG
- to those who have a server or host matching the mask. The mask must
- have at least 1 (one) "." in it and no wildcards following the
- last ".". This requirement exists to prevent people sending messages
- to "#*" or "$*", which would broadcast to all users; from
- experience, this is abused more than used responsibly and properly.
- Wildcards are the '*' and '?' characters. This extension to
- the PRIVMSG command is only available to Operators.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NORECIPIENT ERR_NOTEXTTOSEND
- ERR_CANNOTSENDTOCHAN ERR_NOTOPLEVEL
- ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS
- ERR_NOSUCHNICK
- RPL_AWAY
-
- Examples:
-
-:Angel PRIVMSG Wiz :Hello are you receiving this message ?
- ; Message from Angel to Wiz.
-
-PRIVMSG Angel :yes I'm receiving it !receiving it !'u>(768u+1n) .br ;
- Message to Angel.
-
-PRIVMSG jto@tolsun.oulu.fi :Hello !
- ; Message to a client on server
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 32]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- tolsun.oulu.fi with username of "jto".
-
-PRIVMSG $*.fi :Server tolsun.oulu.fi rebooting.
- ; Message to everyone on a server which
- has a name matching *.fi.
-
-PRIVMSG #*.edu :NSFNet is undergoing work, expect interruptions
- ; Message to all users who come from a
- host which has a name matching *.edu.
-
-4.4.2 Notice
-
- Command: NOTICE
- Parameters: <nickname> <text>
-
- The NOTICE message is used similarly to PRIVMSG. The difference
- between NOTICE and PRIVMSG is that automatic replies must never be
- sent in response to a NOTICE message. This rule applies to servers
- too - they must not send any error reply back to the client on
- receipt of a notice. The object of this rule is to avoid loops
- between a client automatically sending something in response to
- something it received. This is typically used by automatons (clients
- with either an AI or other interactive program controlling their
- actions) which are always seen to be replying lest they end up in a
- loop with another automaton.
-
- See PRIVMSG for more details on replies and examples.
-
-4.5 User based queries
-
- User queries are a group of commands which are primarily concerned
- with finding details on a particular user or group users. When using
- wildcards with any of these commands, if they match, they will only
- return information on users who are 'visible' to you. The visibility
- of a user is determined as a combination of the user's mode and the
- common set of channels you are both on.
-
-4.5.1 Who query
-
- Command: WHO
- Parameters: [<name> [<o>]]
-
- The WHO message is used by a client to generate a query which returns
- a list of information which 'matches' the <name> parameter given by
- the client. In the absence of the <name> parameter, all visible
- (users who aren't invisible (user mode +i) and who don't have a
- common channel with the requesting client) are listed. The same
- result can be achieved by using a <name> of "0" or any wildcard which
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 33]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- will end up matching every entry possible.
-
- The <name> passed to WHO is matched against users' host, server, real
- name and nickname if the channel <name> cannot be found.
-
- If the "o" parameter is passed only operators are returned according
- to the name mask supplied.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
- RPL_WHOREPLY RPL_ENDOFWHO
-
- Examples:
-
- WHO *.fi ; List all users who match against
- "*.fi".
-
- WHO jto* o ; List all users with a match against
- "jto*" if they are an operator.
-
-4.5.2 Whois query
-
- Command: WHOIS
- Parameters: [<server>] <nickmask>[,<nickmask>[,...]]
-
- This message is used to query information about particular user. The
- server will answer this message with several numeric messages
- indicating different statuses of each user which matches the nickmask
- (if you are entitled to see them). If no wildcard is present in the
- <nickmask>, any information about that nick which you are allowed to
- see is presented. A comma (',') separated list of nicknames may be
- given.
-
- The latter version sends the query to a specific server. It is
- useful if you want to know how long the user in question has been
- idle as only local server (ie. the server the user is directly
- connected to) knows that information, while everything else is
- globally known.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN
- RPL_WHOISUSER RPL_WHOISCHANNELS
- RPL_WHOISCHANNELS RPL_WHOISSERVER
- RPL_AWAY RPL_WHOISOPERATOR
- RPL_WHOISIDLE ERR_NOSUCHNICK
- RPL_ENDOFWHOIS
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 34]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- Examples:
-
- WHOIS wiz ; return available user information
- about nick WiZ
-
- WHOIS eff.org trillian ; ask server eff.org for user
- information about trillian
-
-4.5.3 Whowas
-
- Command: WHOWAS
- Parameters: <nickname> [<count> [<server>]]
-
- Whowas asks for information about a nickname which no longer exists.
- This may either be due to a nickname change or the user leaving IRC.
- In response to this query, the server searches through its nickname
- history, looking for any nicks which are lexically the same (no wild
- card matching here). The history is searched backward, returning the
- most recent entry first. If there are multiple entries, up to
- <count> replies will be returned (or all of them if no <count>
- parameter is given). If a non-positive number is passed as being
- <count>, then a full search is done.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK
- RPL_WHOWASUSER RPL_WHOISSERVER
- RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS
-
- Examples:
-
- WHOWAS Wiz ; return all information in the nick
- history about nick "WiZ";
-
- WHOWAS Mermaid 9 ; return at most, the 9 most recent
- entries in the nick history for
- "Mermaid";
-
- WHOWAS Trillian 1 *.edu ; return the most recent history for
- "Trillian" from the first server found
- to match "*.edu".
-
-4.6 Miscellaneous messages
-
- Messages in this category do not fit into any of the above categories
- but are nonetheless still a part of and required by the protocol.
-
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 35]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-4.6.1 Kill message
-
- Command: KILL
- Parameters: <nickname> <comment>
-
- The KILL message is used to cause a client-server connection to be
- closed by the server which has the actual connection. KILL is used
- by servers when they encounter a duplicate entry in the list of valid
- nicknames and is used to remove both entries. It is also available
- to operators.
-
- Clients which have automatic reconnect algorithms effectively make
- this command useless since the disconnection is only brief. It does
- however break the flow of data and can be used to stop large amounts
- of being abused, any user may elect to receive KILL messages
- generated for others to keep an 'eye' on would be trouble spots.
-
- In an arena where nicknames are required to be globally unique at all
- times, KILL messages are sent whenever 'duplicates' are detected
- (that is an attempt to register two users with the same nickname) in
- the hope that both of them will disappear and only 1 reappear.
-
- The comment given must reflect the actual reason for the KILL. For
- server-generated KILLs it usually is made up of details concerning
- the origins of the two conflicting nicknames. For users it is left
- up to them to provide an adequate reason to satisfy others who see
- it. To prevent/discourage fake KILLs from being generated to hide
- the identify of the KILLer, the comment also shows a 'kill-path'
- which is updated by each server it passes through, each prepending
- its name to the path.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
- ERR_NOSUCHNICK ERR_CANTKILLSERVER
-
-
- KILL David (csd.bu.edu <- tolsun.oulu.fi)
- ; Nickname collision between csd.bu.edu
- and tolson.oulu.fi
-
-
- NOTE:
- It is recommended that only Operators be allowed to kill other users
- with KILL message. In an ideal world not even operators would need
- to do this and it would be left to servers to deal with.
-
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 36]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-4.6.2 Ping message
-
- Command: PING
- Parameters: <server1> [<server2>]
-
- The PING message is used to test the presence of an active client at
- the other end of the connection. A PING message is sent at regular
- intervals if no other activity detected coming from a connection. If
- a connection fails to respond to a PING command within a set amount
- of time, that connection is closed.
-
- Any client which receives a PING message must respond to <server1>
- (server which sent the PING message out) as quickly as possible with
- an appropriate PONG message to indicate it is still there and alive.
- Servers should not respond to PING commands but rely on PINGs from
- the other end of the connection to indicate the connection is alive.
- If the <server2> parameter is specified, the PING message gets
- forwarded there.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOORIGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
-
- Examples:
-
- PING tolsun.oulu.fi ; server sending a PING message to
- another server to indicate it is still
- alive.
-
- PING WiZ ; PING message being sent to nick WiZ
-
-4.6.3 Pong message
-
- Command: PONG
- Parameters: <daemon> [<daemon2>]
-
- PONG message is a reply to ping message. If parameter <daemon2> is
- given this message must be forwarded to given daemon. The <daemon>
- parameter is the name of the daemon who has responded to PING message
- and generated this message.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOORIGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
-
- Examples:
-
- PONG csd.bu.edu tolsun.oulu.fi ; PONG message from csd.bu.edu to
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 37]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- tolsun.oulu.fi
-
-4.6.4 Error
-
- Command: ERROR
- Parameters: <error message>
-
- The ERROR command is for use by servers when reporting a serious or
- fatal error to its operators. It may also be sent from one server to
- another but must not be accepted from any normal unknown clients.
-
- An ERROR message is for use for reporting errors which occur with a
- server-to-server link only. An ERROR message is sent to the server
- at the other end (which sends it to all of its connected operators)
- and to all operators currently connected. It is not to be passed
- onto any other servers by a server if it is received from a server.
-
- When a server sends a received ERROR message to its operators, the
- message should be encapsulated inside a NOTICE message, indicating
- that the client was not responsible for the error.
-
- Numerics:
-
- None.
-
- Examples:
-
- ERROR :Server *.fi already exists; ERROR message to the other server
- which caused this error.
-
- NOTICE WiZ :ERROR from csd.bu.edu -- Server *.fi already exists
- ; Same ERROR message as above but sent
- to user WiZ on the other server.
-
-5. OPTIONALS
-
- This section describes OPTIONAL messages. They are not required in a
- working server implementation of the protocol described herein. In
- the absence of the option, an error reply message must be generated
- or an unknown command error. If the message is destined for another
- server to answer then it must be passed on (elementary parsing
- required) The allocated numerics for this are listed with the
- messages below.
-
-5.1 Away
-
- Command: AWAY
- Parameters: [message]
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 38]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- With the AWAY message, clients can set an automatic reply string for
- any PRIVMSG commands directed at them (not to a channel they are on).
- The automatic reply is sent by the server to client sending the
- PRIVMSG command. The only replying server is the one to which the
- sending client is connected to.
-
- The AWAY message is used either with one parameter (to set an AWAY
- message) or with no parameters (to remove the AWAY message).
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- RPL_UNAWAY RPL_NOWAWAY
-
- Examples:
-
- AWAY :Gone to lunch. Back in 5 ; set away message to "Gone to lunch.
- Back in 5".
-
- :WiZ AWAY ; unmark WiZ as being away.
-
-
-5.2 Rehash message
-
- Command: REHASH
- Parameters: None
-
- The rehash message can be used by the operator to force the server to
- re-read and process its configuration file.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- RPL_REHASHING ERR_NOPRIVILEGES
-
-Examples:
-
-REHASH ; message from client with operator
- status to server asking it to reread its
- configuration file.
-
-5.3 Restart message
-
- Command: RESTART
- Parameters: None
-
- The restart message can only be used by an operator to force a server
- restart itself. This message is optional since it may be viewed as a
- risk to allow arbitrary people to connect to a server as an operator
- and execute this command, causing (at least) a disruption to service.
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 39]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- The RESTART command must always be fully processed by the server to
- which the sending client is connected and not be passed onto other
- connected servers.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOPRIVILEGES
-
- Examples:
-
- RESTART ; no parameters required.
-
-5.4 Summon message
-
- Command: SUMMON
- Parameters: <user> [<server>]
-
- The SUMMON command can be used to give users who are on a host
- running an IRC server a message asking them to please join IRC. This
- message is only sent if the target server (a) has SUMMON enabled, (b)
- the user is logged in and (c) the server process can write to the
- user's tty (or similar).
-
- If no <server> parameter is given it tries to summon <user> from the
- server the client is connected to is assumed as the target.
-
- If summon is not enabled in a server, it must return the
- ERR_SUMMONDISABLED numeric and pass the summon message onwards.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NORECIPIENT ERR_FILEERROR
- ERR_NOLOGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
- RPL_SUMMONING
-
- Examples:
-
- SUMMON jto ; summon user jto on the server's host
-
- SUMMON jto tolsun.oulu.fi ; summon user jto on the host which a
- server named "tolsun.oulu.fi" is
- running.
-
-
-5.5 Users
-
- Command: USERS
- Parameters: [<server>]
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 40]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- The USERS command returns a list of users logged into the server in a
- similar format to who(1), rusers(1) and finger(1). Some people
- may disable this command on their server for security related
- reasons. If disabled, the correct numeric must be returned to
- indicate this.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_FILEERROR
- RPL_USERSSTART RPL_USERS
- RPL_NOUSERS RPL_ENDOFUSERS
- ERR_USERSDISABLED
-
- Disabled Reply:
-
- ERR_USERSDISABLED
-
- Examples:
-
-USERS eff.org ; request a list of users logged in on
- server eff.org
-
-:John USERS tolsun.oulu.fi ; request from John for a list of users
- logged in on server tolsun.oulu.fi
-
-5.6 Operwall message
-
- Command: WALLOPS
- Parameters: Text to be sent to all operators currently online
-
- Sends a message to all operators currently online. After
- implementing WALLOPS as a user command it was found that it was
- often and commonly abused as a means of sending a message to a lot
- of people (much similar to WALL). Due to this it is recommended
- that the current implementation of WALLOPS be used as an
- example by allowing and recognising only servers as the senders of
- WALLOPS.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
-
- Examples:
-
- :csd.bu.edu WALLOPS :Connect '*.uiuc.edu 6667' from Joshua; WALLOPS
- message from csd.bu.edu announcing a
- CONNECT message it received and acted
- upon from Joshua.
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 41]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-5.7 Userhost message
-
- Command: USERHOST
- Parameters: <nickname>{<space><nickname>}
-
- The USERHOST command takes a list of up to 5 nicknames, each
- separated by a space character and returns a list of information
- about each nickname that it found. The returned list has each reply
- separated by a space.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- RPL_USERHOST ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
-
- Examples:
-
- USERHOST Wiz Michael Marty p ;USERHOST request for information on
- nicks "Wiz", "Michael", "Marty" and "p"
-
-5.8 Ison message
-
- Command: ISON
- Parameters: <nickname>{<space><nickname>}
-
- The ISON command was implemented to provide a quick and efficient
- means to get a response about whether a given nickname was currently
- on IRC. ISON only takes one (1) parameter: a space-separated list of
- nicks. For each nickname in the list that is present, the server
- adds that to its reply string. Thus the reply string may return
- empty (none of the given nicks are present), an exact copy of the
- parameter string (all of them present) or as any other subset of the
- set of nicks given in the parameter. The only limit on the number
- of nicks that may be checked is that the combined length must not be
- too large as to cause the server to chop it off so it fits in 512
- characters.
-
- ISON is only be processed by the server local to the client sending
- the command and thus not passed onto other servers for further
- processing.
-
- Numeric Replies:
-
- RPL_ISON ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
-
- Examples:
-
- ISON phone trillian WiZ jarlek Avalon Angel Monstah
- ; Sample ISON request for 7 nicks.
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 42]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-6. REPLIES
-
- The following is a list of numeric replies which are generated in
- response to the commands given above. Each numeric is given with its
- number, name and reply string.
-
-6.1 Error Replies.
-
- 401 ERR_NOSUCHNICK
- "<nickname> :No such nick/channel"
-
- - Used to indicate the nickname parameter supplied to a
- command is currently unused.
-
- 402 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
- "<server name> :No such server"
-
- - Used to indicate the server name given currently
- doesn't exist.
-
- 403 ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL
- "<channel name> :No such channel"
-
- - Used to indicate the given channel name is invalid.
-
- 404 ERR_CANNOTSENDTOCHAN
- "<channel name> :Cannot send to channel"
-
- - Sent to a user who is either (a) not on a channel
- which is mode +n or (b) not a chanop (or mode +v) on
- a channel which has mode +m set and is trying to send
- a PRIVMSG message to that channel.
-
- 405 ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS
- "<channel name> :You have joined too many \
- channels"
- - Sent to a user when they have joined the maximum
- number of allowed channels and they try to join
- another channel.
-
- 406 ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK
- "<nickname> :There was no such nickname"
-
- - Returned by WHOWAS to indicate there is no history
- information for that nickname.
-
- 407 ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS
- "<target> :Duplicate recipients. No message \
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 43]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- delivered"
-
- - Returned to a client which is attempting to send a
- PRIVMSG/NOTICE using the user@host destination format
- and for a user@host which has several occurrences.
-
- 409 ERR_NOORIGIN
- ":No origin specified"
-
- - PING or PONG message missing the originator parameter
- which is required since these commands must work
- without valid prefixes.
-
- 411 ERR_NORECIPIENT
- ":No recipient given (<command>)"
- 412 ERR_NOTEXTTOSEND
- ":No text to send"
- 413 ERR_NOTOPLEVEL
- "<mask> :No toplevel domain specified"
- 414 ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL
- "<mask> :Wildcard in toplevel domain"
-
- - 412 - 414 are returned by PRIVMSG to indicate that
- the message wasn't delivered for some reason.
- ERR_NOTOPLEVEL and ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL are errors that
- are returned when an invalid use of
- "PRIVMSG $<server>" or "PRIVMSG #<host>" is attempted.
-
- 421 ERR_UNKNOWNCOMMAND
- "<command> :Unknown command"
-
- - Returned to a registered client to indicate that the
- command sent is unknown by the server.
-
- 422 ERR_NOMOTD
- ":MOTD File is missing"
-
- - Server's MOTD file could not be opened by the server.
-
- 423 ERR_NOADMININFO
- "<server> :No administrative info available"
-
- - Returned by a server in response to an ADMIN message
- when there is an error in finding the appropriate
- information.
-
- 424 ERR_FILEERROR
- ":File error doing <file op> on <file>"
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 44]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- - Generic error message used to report a failed file
- operation during the processing of a message.
-
- 431 ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN
- ":No nickname given"
-
- - Returned when a nickname parameter expected for a
- command and isn't found.
-
- 432 ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME
- "<nick> :Erroneus nickname"
-
- - Returned after receiving a NICK message which contains
- characters which do not fall in the defined set. See
- section x.x.x for details on valid nicknames.
-
- 433 ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE
- "<nick> :Nickname is already in use"
-
- - Returned when a NICK message is processed that results
- in an attempt to change to a currently existing
- nickname.
-
- 436 ERR_NICKCOLLISION
- "<nick> :Nickname collision KILL"
-
- - Returned by a server to a client when it detects a
- nickname collision (registered of a NICK that
- already exists by another server).
-
- 441 ERR_USERNOTINCHANNEL
- "<nick> <channel> :They aren't on that channel"
-
- - Returned by the server to indicate that the target
- user of the command is not on the given channel.
-
- 442 ERR_NOTONCHANNEL
- "<channel> :You're not on that channel"
-
- - Returned by the server whenever a client tries to
- perform a channel effecting command for which the
- client isn't a member.
-
- 443 ERR_USERONCHANNEL
- "<user> <channel> :is already on channel"
-
- - Returned when a client tries to invite a user to a
- channel they are already on.
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 45]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- 444 ERR_NOLOGIN
- "<user> :User not logged in"
-
- - Returned by the summon after a SUMMON command for a
- user was unable to be performed since they were not
- logged in.
-
- 445 ERR_SUMMONDISABLED
- ":SUMMON has been disabled"
-
- - Returned as a response to the SUMMON command. Must be
- returned by any server which does not implement it.
-
- 446 ERR_USERSDISABLED
- ":USERS has been disabled"
-
- - Returned as a response to the USERS command. Must be
- returned by any server which does not implement it.
-
- 451 ERR_NOTREGISTERED
- ":You have not registered"
-
- - Returned by the server to indicate that the client
- must be registered before the server will allow it
- to be parsed in detail.
-
- 461 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
- "<command> :Not enough parameters"
-
- - Returned by the server by numerous commands to
- indicate to the client that it didn't supply enough
- parameters.
-
- 462 ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED
- ":You may not reregister"
-
- - Returned by the server to any link which tries to
- change part of the registered details (such as
- password or user details from second USER message).
-
-
- 463 ERR_NOPERMFORHOST
- ":Your host isn't among the privileged"
-
- - Returned to a client which attempts to register with
- a server which does not been setup to allow
- connections from the host the attempted connection
- is tried.
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 46]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- 464 ERR_PASSWDMISMATCH
- ":Password incorrect"
-
- - Returned to indicate a failed attempt at registering
- a connection for which a password was required and
- was either not given or incorrect.
-
- 465 ERR_YOUREBANNEDCREEP
- ":You are banned from this server"
-
- - Returned after an attempt to connect and register
- yourself with a server which has been setup to
- explicitly deny connections to you.
-
- 467 ERR_KEYSET
- "<channel> :Channel key already set"
- 471 ERR_CHANNELISFULL
- "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+l)"
- 472 ERR_UNKNOWNMODE
- "<char> :is unknown mode char to me"
- 473 ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN
- "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+i)"
- 474 ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN
- "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+b)"
- 475 ERR_BADCHANNELKEY
- "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+k)"
- 481 ERR_NOPRIVILEGES
- ":Permission Denied- You're not an IRC operator"
-
- - Any command requiring operator privileges to operate
- must return this error to indicate the attempt was
- unsuccessful.
-
- 482 ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED
- "<channel> :You're not channel operator"
-
- - Any command requiring 'chanop' privileges (such as
- MODE messages) must return this error if the client
- making the attempt is not a chanop on the specified
- channel.
-
- 483 ERR_CANTKILLSERVER
- ":You cant kill a server!"
-
- - Any attempts to use the KILL command on a server
- are to be refused and this error returned directly
- to the client.
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 47]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- 491 ERR_NOOPERHOST
- ":No O-lines for your host"
-
- - If a client sends an OPER message and the server has
- not been configured to allow connections from the
- client's host as an operator, this error must be
- returned.
-
- 501 ERR_UMODEUNKNOWNFLAG
- ":Unknown MODE flag"
-
- - Returned by the server to indicate that a MODE
- message was sent with a nickname parameter and that
- the a mode flag sent was not recognized.
-
- 502 ERR_USERSDONTMATCH
- ":Cant change mode for other users"
-
- - Error sent to any user trying to view or change the
- user mode for a user other than themselves.
-
-6.2 Command responses.
-
- 300 RPL_NONE
- Dummy reply number. Not used.
-
- 302 RPL_USERHOST
- ":[<reply>{<space><reply>}]"
-
- - Reply format used by USERHOST to list replies to
- the query list. The reply string is composed as
- follows:
-
- <reply> ::= <nick>['*'] '=' <'+'|'-'><hostname>
-
- The '*' indicates whether the client has registered
- as an Operator. The '-' or '+' characters represent
- whether the client has set an AWAY message or not
- respectively.
-
- 303 RPL_ISON
- ":[<nick> {<space><nick>}]"
-
- - Reply format used by ISON to list replies to the
- query list.
-
- 301 RPL_AWAY
- "<nick> :<away message>"
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 48]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- 305 RPL_UNAWAY
- ":You are no longer marked as being away"
- 306 RPL_NOWAWAY
- ":You have been marked as being away"
-
- - These replies are used with the AWAY command (if
- allowed). RPL_AWAY is sent to any client sending a
- PRIVMSG to a client which is away. RPL_AWAY is only
- sent by the server to which the client is connected.
- Replies RPL_UNAWAY and RPL_NOWAWAY are sent when the
- client removes and sets an AWAY message.
-
- 311 RPL_WHOISUSER
- "<nick> <user> <host> * :<real name>"
- 312 RPL_WHOISSERVER
- "<nick> <server> :<server info>"
- 313 RPL_WHOISOPERATOR
- "<nick> :is an IRC operator"
- 317 RPL_WHOISIDLE
- "<nick> <integer> :seconds idle"
- 318 RPL_ENDOFWHOIS
- "<nick> :End of /WHOIS list"
- 319 RPL_WHOISCHANNELS
- "<nick> :{[@|+]<channel><space>}"
-
- - Replies 311 - 313, 317 - 319 are all replies
- generated in response to a WHOIS message. Given that
- there are enough parameters present, the answering
- server must either formulate a reply out of the above
- numerics (if the query nick is found) or return an
- error reply. The '*' in RPL_WHOISUSER is there as
- the literal character and not as a wild card. For
- each reply set, only RPL_WHOISCHANNELS may appear
- more than once (for long lists of channel names).
- The '@' and '+' characters next to the channel name
- indicate whether a client is a channel operator or
- has been granted permission to speak on a moderated
- channel. The RPL_ENDOFWHOIS reply is used to mark
- the end of processing a WHOIS message.
-
- 314 RPL_WHOWASUSER
- "<nick> <user> <host> * :<real name>"
- 369 RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS
- "<nick> :End of WHOWAS"
-
- - When replying to a WHOWAS message, a server must use
- the replies RPL_WHOWASUSER, RPL_WHOISSERVER or
- ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK for each nickname in the presented
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 49]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- list. At the end of all reply batches, there must
- be RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS (even if there was only one reply
- and it was an error).
-
- 321 RPL_LISTSTART
- "Channel :Users Name"
- 322 RPL_LIST
- "<channel> <# visible> :<topic>"
- 323 RPL_LISTEND
- ":End of /LIST"
-
- - Replies RPL_LISTSTART, RPL_LIST, RPL_LISTEND mark
- the start, actual replies with data and end of the
- server's response to a LIST command. If there are
- no channels available to return, only the start
- and end reply must be sent.
-
- 324 RPL_CHANNELMODEIS
- "<channel> <mode> <mode params>"
-
- 331 RPL_NOTOPIC
- "<channel> :No topic is set"
- 332 RPL_TOPIC
- "<channel> :<topic>"
-
- - When sending a TOPIC message to determine the
- channel topic, one of two replies is sent. If
- the topic is set, RPL_TOPIC is sent back else
- RPL_NOTOPIC.
-
- 341 RPL_INVITING
- "<channel> <nick>"
-
- - Returned by the server to indicate that the
- attempted INVITE message was successful and is
- being passed onto the end client.
-
- 342 RPL_SUMMONING
- "<user> :Summoning user to IRC"
-
- - Returned by a server answering a SUMMON message to
- indicate that it is summoning that user.
-
- 351 RPL_VERSION
- "<version>.<debuglevel> <server> :<comments>"
-
- - Reply by the server showing its version details.
- The <version> is the version of the software being
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 50]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- used (including any patchlevel revisions) and the
- <debuglevel> is used to indicate if the server is
- running in "debug mode".
-
- The "comments" field may contain any comments about
- the version or further version details.
-
- 352 RPL_WHOREPLY
- "<channel> <user> <host> <server> <nick> \
- <H|G>[*][@|+] :<hopcount> <real name>"
- 315 RPL_ENDOFWHO
- "<name> :End of /WHO list"
-
- - The RPL_WHOREPLY and RPL_ENDOFWHO pair are used
- to answer a WHO message. The RPL_WHOREPLY is only
- sent if there is an appropriate match to the WHO
- query. If there is a list of parameters supplied
- with a WHO message, a RPL_ENDOFWHO must be sent
- after processing each list item with <name> being
- the item.
-
- 353 RPL_NAMREPLY
- "<channel> :[[@|+]<nick> [[@|+]<nick> [...]]]"
- 366 RPL_ENDOFNAMES
- "<channel> :End of /NAMES list"
-
- - To reply to a NAMES message, a reply pair consisting
- of RPL_NAMREPLY and RPL_ENDOFNAMES is sent by the
- server back to the client. If there is no channel
- found as in the query, then only RPL_ENDOFNAMES is
- returned. The exception to this is when a NAMES
- message is sent with no parameters and all visible
- channels and contents are sent back in a series of
- RPL_NAMEREPLY messages with a RPL_ENDOFNAMES to mark
- the end.
-
- 364 RPL_LINKS
- "<mask> <server> :<hopcount> <server info>"
- 365 RPL_ENDOFLINKS
- "<mask> :End of /LINKS list"
-
- - In replying to the LINKS message, a server must send
- replies back using the RPL_LINKS numeric and mark the
- end of the list using an RPL_ENDOFLINKS reply.
-
- 367 RPL_BANLIST
- "<channel> <banid>"
- 368 RPL_ENDOFBANLIST
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 51]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- "<channel> :End of channel ban list"
-
- - When listing the active 'bans' for a given channel,
- a server is required to send the list back using the
- RPL_BANLIST and RPL_ENDOFBANLIST messages. A separate
- RPL_BANLIST is sent for each active banid. After the
- banids have been listed (or if none present) a
- RPL_ENDOFBANLIST must be sent.
-
- 371 RPL_INFO
- ":<string>"
- 374 RPL_ENDOFINFO
- ":End of /INFO list"
-
- - A server responding to an INFO message is required to
- send all its 'info' in a series of RPL_INFO messages
- with a RPL_ENDOFINFO reply to indicate the end of the
- replies.
-
- 375 RPL_MOTDSTART
- ":- <server> Message of the day - "
- 372 RPL_MOTD
- ":- <text>"
- 376 RPL_ENDOFMOTD
- ":End of /MOTD command"
-
- - When responding to the MOTD message and the MOTD file
- is found, the file is displayed line by line, with
- each line no longer than 80 characters, using
- RPL_MOTD format replies. These should be surrounded
- by a RPL_MOTDSTART (before the RPL_MOTDs) and an
- RPL_ENDOFMOTD (after).
-
- 381 RPL_YOUREOPER
- ":You are now an IRC operator"
-
- - RPL_YOUREOPER is sent back to a client which has
- just successfully issued an OPER message and gained
- operator status.
-
- 382 RPL_REHASHING
- "<config file> :Rehashing"
-
- - If the REHASH option is used and an operator sends
- a REHASH message, an RPL_REHASHING is sent back to
- the operator.
-
- 391 RPL_TIME
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 52]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- "<server> :<string showing server's local time>"
-
- - When replying to the TIME message, a server must send
- the reply using the RPL_TIME format above. The string
- showing the time need only contain the correct day and
- time there. There is no further requirement for the
- time string.
-
- 392 RPL_USERSSTART
- ":UserID Terminal Host"
- 393 RPL_USERS
- ":%-8s %-9s %-8s"
- 394 RPL_ENDOFUSERS
- ":End of users"
- 395 RPL_NOUSERS
- ":Nobody logged in"
-
- - If the USERS message is handled by a server, the
- replies RPL_USERSTART, RPL_USERS, RPL_ENDOFUSERS and
- RPL_NOUSERS are used. RPL_USERSSTART must be sent
- first, following by either a sequence of RPL_USERS
- or a single RPL_NOUSER. Following this is
- RPL_ENDOFUSERS.
-
- 200 RPL_TRACELINK
- "Link <version & debug level> <destination> \
- <next server>"
- 201 RPL_TRACECONNECTING
- "Try. <class> <server>"
- 202 RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE
- "H.S. <class> <server>"
- 203 RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN
- "???? <class> [<client IP address in dot form>]"
- 204 RPL_TRACEOPERATOR
- "Oper <class> <nick>"
- 205 RPL_TRACEUSER
- "User <class> <nick>"
- 206 RPL_TRACESERVER
- "Serv <class> <int>S <int>C <server> \
- <nick!user|*!*>@<host|server>"
- 208 RPL_TRACENEWTYPE
- "<newtype> 0 <client name>"
- 261 RPL_TRACELOG
- "File <logfile> <debug level>"
-
- - The RPL_TRACE* are all returned by the server in
- response to the TRACE message. How many are
- returned is dependent on the the TRACE message and
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 53]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- whether it was sent by an operator or not. There
- is no predefined order for which occurs first.
- Replies RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN, RPL_TRACECONNECTING and
- RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE are all used for connections
- which have not been fully established and are either
- unknown, still attempting to connect or in the
- process of completing the 'server handshake'.
- RPL_TRACELINK is sent by any server which handles
- a TRACE message and has to pass it on to another
- server. The list of RPL_TRACELINKs sent in
- response to a TRACE command traversing the IRC
- network should reflect the actual connectivity of
- the servers themselves along that path.
- RPL_TRACENEWTYPE is to be used for any connection
- which does not fit in the other categories but is
- being displayed anyway.
-
- 211 RPL_STATSLINKINFO
- "<linkname> <sendq> <sent messages> \
- <sent bytes> <received messages> \
- <received bytes> <time open>"
- 212 RPL_STATSCOMMANDS
- "<command> <count>"
- 213 RPL_STATSCLINE
- "C <host> * <name> <port> <class>"
- 214 RPL_STATSNLINE
- "N <host> * <name> <port> <class>"
- 215 RPL_STATSILINE
- "I <host> * <host> <port> <class>"
- 216 RPL_STATSKLINE
- "K <host> * <username> <port> <class>"
- 218 RPL_STATSYLINE
- "Y <class> <ping frequency> <connect \
- frequency> <max sendq>"
- 219 RPL_ENDOFSTATS
- "<stats letter> :End of /STATS report"
- 241 RPL_STATSLLINE
- "L <hostmask> * <servername> <maxdepth>"
- 242 RPL_STATSUPTIME
- ":Server Up %d days %d:%02d:%02d"
- 243 RPL_STATSOLINE
- "O <hostmask> * <name>"
- 244 RPL_STATSHLINE
- "H <hostmask> * <servername>"
-
- 221 RPL_UMODEIS
- "<user mode string>"
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 54]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- - To answer a query about a client's own mode,
- RPL_UMODEIS is sent back.
-
- 251 RPL_LUSERCLIENT
- ":There are <integer> users and <integer> \
- invisible on <integer> servers"
- 252 RPL_LUSEROP
- "<integer> :operator(s) online"
- 253 RPL_LUSERUNKNOWN
- "<integer> :unknown connection(s)"
- 254 RPL_LUSERCHANNELS
- "<integer> :channels formed"
- 255 RPL_LUSERME
- ":I have <integer> clients and <integer> \
- servers"
-
- - In processing an LUSERS message, the server
- sends a set of replies from RPL_LUSERCLIENT,
- RPL_LUSEROP, RPL_USERUNKNOWN,
- RPL_LUSERCHANNELS and RPL_LUSERME. When
- replying, a server must send back
- RPL_LUSERCLIENT and RPL_LUSERME. The other
- replies are only sent back if a non-zero count
- is found for them.
-
- 256 RPL_ADMINME
- "<server> :Administrative info"
- 257 RPL_ADMINLOC1
- ":<admin info>"
- 258 RPL_ADMINLOC2
- ":<admin info>"
- 259 RPL_ADMINEMAIL
- ":<admin info>"
-
- - When replying to an ADMIN message, a server
- is expected to use replies RLP_ADMINME
- through to RPL_ADMINEMAIL and provide a text
- message with each. For RPL_ADMINLOC1 a
- description of what city, state and country
- the server is in is expected, followed by
- details of the university and department
- (RPL_ADMINLOC2) and finally the administrative
- contact for the server (an email address here
- is required) in RPL_ADMINEMAIL.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 55]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-6.3 Reserved numerics.
-
- These numerics are not described above since they fall into one of
- the following categories:
-
- 1. no longer in use;
-
- 2. reserved for future planned use;
-
- 3. in current use but are part of a non-generic 'feature' of
- the current IRC server.
-
- 209 RPL_TRACECLASS 217 RPL_STATSQLINE
- 231 RPL_SERVICEINFO 232 RPL_ENDOFSERVICES
- 233 RPL_SERVICE 234 RPL_SERVLIST
- 235 RPL_SERVLISTEND
- 316 RPL_WHOISCHANOP 361 RPL_KILLDONE
- 362 RPL_CLOSING 363 RPL_CLOSEEND
- 373 RPL_INFOSTART 384 RPL_MYPORTIS
- 466 ERR_YOUWILLBEBANNED 476 ERR_BADCHANMASK
- 492 ERR_NOSERVICEHOST
-
-7. Client and server authentication
-
- Clients and servers are both subject to the same level of
- authentication. For both, an IP number to hostname lookup (and
- reverse check on this) is performed for all connections made to the
- server. Both connections are then subject to a password check (if
- there is a password set for that connection). These checks are
- possible on all connections although the password check is only
- commonly used with servers.
-
- An additional check that is becoming of more and more common is that
- of the username responsible for making the connection. Finding the
- username of the other end of the connection typically involves
- connecting to an authentication server such as IDENT as described in
- RFC 1413.
-
- Given that without passwords it is not easy to reliably determine who
- is on the other end of a network connection, use of passwords is
- strongly recommended on inter-server connections in addition to any
- other measures such as using an ident server.
-
-8. Current implementations
-
- The only current implementation of this protocol is the IRC server,
- version 2.8. Earlier versions may implement some or all of the
- commands described by this document with NOTICE messages replacing
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 56]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- many of the numeric replies. Unfortunately, due to backward
- compatibility requirements, the implementation of some parts of this
- document varies with what is laid out. On notable difference is:
-
- * recognition that any LF or CR anywhere in a message marks the
- end of that message (instead of requiring CR-LF);
-
- The rest of this section deals with issues that are mostly of
- importance to those who wish to implement a server but some parts
- also apply directly to clients as well.
-
-8.1 Network protocol: TCP - why it is best used here.
-
- IRC has been implemented on top of TCP since TCP supplies a reliable
- network protocol which is well suited to this scale of conferencing.
- The use of multicast IP is an alternative, but it is not widely
- available or supported at the present time.
-
-8.1.1 Support of Unix sockets
-
- Given that Unix domain sockets allow listen/connect operations, the
- current implementation can be configured to listen and accept both
- client and server connections on a Unix domain socket. These are
- recognized as sockets where the hostname starts with a '/'.
-
- When providing any information about the connections on a Unix domain
- socket, the server is required to supplant the actual hostname in
- place of the pathname unless the actual socket name is being asked
- for.
-
-8.2 Command Parsing
-
- To provide useful 'non-buffered' network IO for clients and servers,
- each connection is given its own private 'input buffer' in which the
- results of the most recent read and parsing are kept. A buffer size
- of 512 bytes is used so as to hold 1 full message, although, this
- will usually hold several commands. The private buffer is parsed
- after every read operation for valid messages. When dealing with
- multiple messages from one client in the buffer, care should be taken
- in case one happens to cause the client to be 'removed'.
-
-8.3 Message delivery
-
- It is common to find network links saturated or hosts to which you
- are sending data unable to send data. Although Unix typically
- handles this through the TCP window and internal buffers, the server
- often has large amounts of data to send (especially when a new
- server-server link forms) and the small buffers provided in the
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 57]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- kernel are not enough for the outgoing queue. To alleviate this
- problem, a "send queue" is used as a FIFO queue for data to be sent.
- A typical "send queue" may grow to 200 Kbytes on a large IRC network
- with a slow network connection when a new server connects.
-
- When polling its connections, a server will first read and parse all
- incoming data, queuing any data to be sent out. When all available
- input is processed, the queued data is sent. This reduces the number
- of write() system calls and helps TCP make bigger packets.
-
-8.4 Connection 'Liveness'
-
- To detect when a connection has died or become unresponsive, the
- server must ping each of its connections that it doesn't get a
- response from in a given amount of time.
-
- If a connection doesn't respond in time, its connection is closed
- using the appropriate procedures. A connection is also dropped if
- its sendq grows beyond the maximum allowed, because it is better to
- close a slow connection than have a server process block.
-
-8.5 Establishing a server to client connection
-
- Upon connecting to an IRC server, a client is sent the MOTD (if
- present) as well as the current user/server count (as per the LUSER
- command). The server is also required to give an unambiguous message
- to the client which states its name and version as well as any other
- introductory messages which may be deemed appropriate.
-
- After dealing with this, the server must then send out the new user's
- nickname and other information as supplied by itself (USER command)
- and as the server could discover (from DNS/authentication servers).
- The server must send this information out with NICK first followed by
- USER.
-
-8.6 Establishing a server-server connection.
-
- The process of establishing of a server-to-server connection is
- fraught with danger since there are many possible areas where
- problems can occur - the least of which are race conditions.
-
- After a server has received a connection following by a PASS/SERVER
- pair which were recognised as being valid, the server should then
- reply with its own PASS/SERVER information for that connection as
- well as all of the other state information it knows about as
- described below.
-
- When the initiating server receives a PASS/SERVER pair, it too then
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 58]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- checks that the server responding is authenticated properly before
- accepting the connection to be that server.
-
-8.6.1 Server exchange of state information when connecting
-
- The order of state information being exchanged between servers is
- essential. The required order is as follows:
-
- * all known other servers;
-
- * all known user information;
-
- * all known channel information.
-
- Information regarding servers is sent via extra SERVER messages, user
- information with NICK/USER/MODE/JOIN messages and channels with MODE
- messages.
-
- NOTE: channel topics are *NOT* exchanged here because the TOPIC
- command overwrites any old topic information, so at best, the two
- sides of the connection would exchange topics.
-
- By passing the state information about servers first, any collisions
- with servers that already exist occur before nickname collisions due
- to a second server introducing a particular nickname. Due to the IRC
- network only being able to exist as an acyclic graph, it may be
- possible that the network has already reconnected in another
- location, the place where the collision occurs indicating where the
- net needs to split.
-
-8.7 Terminating server-client connections
-
- When a client connection closes, a QUIT message is generated on
- behalf of the client by the server to which the client connected. No
- other message is to be generated or used.
-
-8.8 Terminating server-server connections
-
- If a server-server connection is closed, either via a remotely
- generated SQUIT or 'natural' causes, the rest of the connected IRC
- network must have its information updated with by the server which
- detected the closure. The server then sends a list of SQUITs (one
- for each server behind that connection) and a list of QUITs (again,
- one for each client behind that connection).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 59]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-8.9 Tracking nickname changes
-
- All IRC servers are required to keep a history of recent nickname
- changes. This is required to allow the server to have a chance of
- keeping in touch of things when nick-change race conditions occur
- with commands which manipulate them. Commands which must trace nick
- changes are:
-
- * KILL (the nick being killed)
-
- * MODE (+/- o,v)
-
- * KICK (the nick being kicked)
-
- No other commands are to have nick changes checked for.
-
- In the above cases, the server is required to first check for the
- existence of the nickname, then check its history to see who that
- nick currently belongs to (if anyone!). This reduces the chances of
- race conditions but they can still occur with the server ending up
- affecting the wrong client. When performing a change trace for an
- above command it is recommended that a time range be given and
- entries which are too old ignored.
-
- For a reasonable history, a server should be able to keep previous
- nickname for every client it knows about if they all decided to
- change. This size is limited by other factors (such as memory, etc).
-
-8.10 Flood control of clients
-
- With a large network of interconnected IRC servers, it is quite easy
- for any single client attached to the network to supply a continuous
- stream of messages that result in not only flooding the network, but
- also degrading the level of service provided to others. Rather than
- require every 'victim' to be provide their own protection, flood
- protection was written into the server and is applied to all clients
- except services. The current algorithm is as follows:
-
- * check to see if client's `message timer' is less than
- current time (set to be equal if it is);
-
- * read any data present from the client;
-
- * while the timer is less than ten seconds ahead of the current
- time, parse any present messages and penalize the client by
- 2 seconds for each message;
-
- which in essence means that the client may send 1 message every 2
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 60]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- seconds without being adversely affected.
-
-8.11 Non-blocking lookups
-
- In a real-time environment, it is essential that a server process do
- as little waiting as possible so that all the clients are serviced
- fairly. Obviously this requires non-blocking IO on all network
- read/write operations. For normal server connections, this was not
- difficult, but there are other support operations that may cause the
- server to block (such as disk reads). Where possible, such activity
- should be performed with a short timeout.
-
-8.11.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups
-
- Using the standard resolver libraries from Berkeley and others has
- meant large delays in some cases where replies have timed out. To
- avoid this, a separate set of DNS routines were written which were
- setup for non-blocking IO operations and then polled from within the
- main server IO loop.
-
-8.11.2 Username (Ident) lookups
-
- Although there are numerous ident libraries for use and inclusion
- into other programs, these caused problems since they operated in a
- synchronous manner and resulted in frequent delays. Again the
- solution was to write a set of routines which would cooperate with
- the rest of the server and work using non-blocking IO.
-
-8.12 Configuration File
-
- To provide a flexible way of setting up and running the server, it is
- recommended that a configuration file be used which contains
- instructions to the server on the following:
-
- * which hosts to accept client connections from;
-
- * which hosts to allow to connect as servers;
-
- * which hosts to connect to (both actively and
- passively);
-
- * information about where the server is (university,
- city/state, company are examples of this);
-
- * who is responsible for the server and an email address
- at which they can be contacted;
-
- * hostnames and passwords for clients which wish to be given
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 61]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- access to restricted operator commands.
-
- In specifying hostnames, both domain names and use of the 'dot'
- notation (127.0.0.1) should both be accepted. It must be possible to
- specify the password to be used/accepted for all outgoing and
- incoming connections (although the only outgoing connections are
- those to other servers).
-
- The above list is the minimum requirement for any server which wishes
- to make a connection with another server. Other items which may be
- of use are:
-
- * specifying which servers other server may introduce;
-
- * how deep a server branch is allowed to become;
-
- * hours during which clients may connect.
-
-8.12.1 Allowing clients to connect
-
- A server should use some sort of 'access control list' (either in the
- configuration file or elsewhere) that is read at startup and used to
- decide what hosts clients may use to connect to it.
-
- Both 'deny' and 'allow' should be implemented to provide the required
- flexibility for host access control.
-
-8.12.2 Operators
-
- The granting of operator privileges to a disruptive person can have
- dire consequences for the well-being of the IRC net in general due to
- the powers given to them. Thus, the acquisition of such powers
- should not be very easy. The current setup requires two 'passwords'
- to be used although one of them is usually easy guessed. Storage of
- oper passwords in configuration files is preferable to hard coding
- them in and should be stored in a crypted format (ie using crypt(3)
- from Unix) to prevent easy theft.
-
-8.12.3 Allowing servers to connect
-
- The interconnection of server is not a trivial matter: a bad
- connection can have a large impact on the usefulness of IRC. Thus,
- each server should have a list of servers to which it may connect and
- which servers may connect to it. Under no circumstances should a
- server allow an arbitrary host to connect as a server. In addition
- to which servers may and may not connect, the configuration file
- should also store the password and other characteristics of that
- link.
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 62]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-8.12.4 Administrivia
-
- To provide accurate and valid replies to the ADMIN command (see
- section 4.3.7), the server should find the relevant details in the
- configuration.
-
-8.13 Channel membership
-
- The current server allows any registered local user to join upto 10
- different channels. There is no limit imposed on non-local users so
- that the server remains (reasonably) consistant with all others on a
- channel membership basis
-
-9. Current problems
-
- There are a number of recognized problems with this protocol, all of
- which hope to be solved sometime in the near future during its
- rewrite. Currently, work is underway to find working solutions to
- these problems.
-
-9.1 Scalability
-
- It is widely recognized that this protocol does not scale
- sufficiently well when used in a large arena. The main problem comes
- from the requirement that all servers know about all other servers
- and users and that information regarding them be updated as soon as
- it changes. It is also desirable to keep the number of servers low
- so that the path length between any two points is kept minimal and
- the spanning tree as strongly branched as possible.
-
-9.2 Labels
-
- The current IRC protocol has 3 types of labels: the nickname, the
- channel name and the server name. Each of the three types has its
- own domain and no duplicates are allowed inside that domain.
- Currently, it is possible for users to pick the label for any of the
- three, resulting in collisions. It is widely recognized that this
- needs reworking, with a plan for unique names for channels and nicks
- that don't collide being desirable as well as a solution allowing a
- cyclic tree.
-
-9.2.1 Nicknames
-
- The idea of the nickname on IRC is very convenient for users to use
- when talking to each other outside of a channel, but there is only a
- finite nickname space and being what they are, its not uncommon for
- several people to want to use the same nick. If a nickname is chosen
- by two people using this protocol, either one will not succeed or
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 63]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
- both will removed by use of KILL (4.6.1).
-
-9.2.2 Channels
-
- The current channel layout requires that all servers know about all
- channels, their inhabitants and properties. Besides not scaling
- well, the issue of privacy is also a concern. A collision of
- channels is treated as an inclusive event (both people who create the
- new channel are considered to be members of it) rather than an
- exclusive one such as used to solve nickname collisions.
-
-9.2.3 Servers
-
- Although the number of servers is usually small relative to the
- number of users and channels, they two currently required to be known
- globally, either each one separately or hidden behind a mask.
-
-9.3 Algorithms
-
- In some places within the server code, it has not been possible to
- avoid N^2 algorithms such as checking the channel list of a set
- of clients.
-
- In current server versions, there are no database consistency checks,
- each server assumes that a neighbouring server is correct. This
- opens the door to large problems if a connecting server is buggy or
- otherwise tries to introduce contradictions to the existing net.
-
- Currently, because of the lack of unique internal and global labels,
- there are a multitude of race conditions that exist. These race
- conditions generally arise from the problem of it taking time for
- messages to traverse and effect the IRC network. Even by changing to
- unique labels, there are problems with channel-related commands being
- disrupted.
-
-10. Current support and availability
-
- Mailing lists for IRC related discussion:
- Future protocol: ircd-three-request@eff.org
- General discussion: operlist-request@eff.org
-
- Software implemenations
- cs.bu.edu:/irc
- nic.funet.fi:/pub/irc
- coombs.anu.edu.au:/pub/irc
-
- Newsgroup: alt.irc
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 64]
-\f
-RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
-
-
-Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are discussed in sections 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.1.3, 5.5, and
- 7.
-
-12. Authors' Addresses
-
- Jarkko Oikarinen
- Tuirantie 17 as 9
- 90500 OULU
- FINLAND
-
- Email: jto@tolsun.oulu.fi
-
-
- Darren Reed
- 4 Pateman Street
- Watsonia, Victoria 3087
- Australia
-
- Email: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-Oikarinen & Reed [Page 65]
-\f
\ No newline at end of file
+
\r\r\r\r\r\rNetwork Working Group J. Oikarinen
\rRequest for Comments: 1459 D. Reed
\r May 1993
\r\r\r Internet Relay Chat Protocol
\r\rStatus of This Memo
\r\r This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
\r community. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
\r Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol
\r Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.
\r Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
\r\rAbstract
\r\r The IRC protocol was developed over the last 4 years since it was
\r first implemented as a means for users on a BBS to chat amongst
\r themselves. Now it supports a world-wide network of servers and
\r clients, and is stringing to cope with growth. Over the past 2 years,
\r the average number of users connected to the main IRC network has
\r grown by a factor of 10.
\r\r The IRC protocol is a text-based protocol, with the simplest client
\r being any socket program capable of connecting to the server.
\r\rTable of Contents
\r\r 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 4
\r 1.1 Servers ................................................ 4
\r 1.2 Clients ................................................ 5
\r 1.2.1 Operators .......................................... 5
\r 1.3 Channels ................................................ 5
\r 1.3.1 Channel Operators .................................... 6
\r 2. THE IRC SPECIFICATION ....................................... 7
\r 2.1 Overview ................................................ 7
\r 2.2 Character codes ......................................... 7
\r 2.3 Messages ................................................ 7
\r 2.3.1 Message format in 'pseudo' BNF .................... 8
\r 2.4 Numeric replies ......................................... 10
\r 3. IRC Concepts ................................................ 10
\r 3.1 One-to-one communication ................................ 10
\r 3.2 One-to-many ............................................. 11
\r 3.2.1 To a list .......................................... 11
\r 3.2.2 To a group (channel) ............................... 11
\r 3.2.3 To a host/server mask .............................. 12
\r 3.3 One to all .............................................. 12
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 1]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r 3.3.1 Client to Client ................................... 12
\r 3.3.2 Clients to Server .................................. 12
\r 3.3.3 Server to Server ................................... 12
\r 4. MESSAGE DETAILS ............................................. 13
\r 4.1 Connection Registration ................................. 13
\r 4.1.1 Password message ................................... 14
\r 4.1.2 Nickname message ................................... 14
\r 4.1.3 User message ....................................... 15
\r 4.1.4 Server message ..................................... 16
\r 4.1.5 Operator message ................................... 17
\r 4.1.6 Quit message ....................................... 17
\r 4.1.7 Server Quit message ................................ 18
\r 4.2 Channel operations ...................................... 19
\r 4.2.1 Join message ....................................... 19
\r 4.2.2 Part message ....................................... 20
\r 4.2.3 Mode message ....................................... 21
\r 4.2.3.1 Channel modes ................................. 21
\r 4.2.3.2 User modes .................................... 22
\r 4.2.4 Topic message ...................................... 23
\r 4.2.5 Names message ...................................... 24
\r 4.2.6 List message ....................................... 24
\r 4.2.7 Invite message ..................................... 25
\r 4.2.8 Kick message ....................................... 25
\r 4.3 Server queries and commands ............................. 26
\r 4.3.1 Version message .................................... 26
\r 4.3.2 Stats message ...................................... 27
\r 4.3.3 Links message ...................................... 28
\r 4.3.4 Time message ....................................... 29
\r 4.3.5 Connect message .................................... 29
\r 4.3.6 Trace message ...................................... 30
\r 4.3.7 Admin message ...................................... 31
\r 4.3.8 Info message ....................................... 31
\r 4.4 Sending messages ........................................ 32
\r 4.4.1 Private messages ................................... 32
\r 4.4.2 Notice messages .................................... 33
\r 4.5 User-based queries ...................................... 33
\r 4.5.1 Who query .......................................... 33
\r 4.5.2 Whois query ........................................ 34
\r 4.5.3 Whowas message ..................................... 35
\r 4.6 Miscellaneous messages .................................. 35
\r 4.6.1 Kill message ....................................... 36
\r 4.6.2 Ping message ....................................... 37
\r 4.6.3 Pong message ....................................... 37
\r 4.6.4 Error message ...................................... 38
\r 5. OPTIONAL MESSAGES ........................................... 38
\r 5.1 Away message ............................................ 38
\r 5.2 Rehash command .......................................... 39
\r 5.3 Restart command ......................................... 39
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 2]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r 5.4 Summon message .......................................... 40
\r 5.5 Users message ........................................... 40
\r 5.6 Operwall command ........................................ 41
\r 5.7 Userhost message ........................................ 42
\r 5.8 Ison message ............................................ 42
\r 6. REPLIES ..................................................... 43
\r 6.1 Error Replies ........................................... 43
\r 6.2 Command responses ....................................... 48
\r 6.3 Reserved numerics ....................................... 56
\r 7. Client and server authentication ............................ 56
\r 8. Current Implementations Details ............................. 56
\r 8.1 Network protocol: TCP ................................... 57
\r 8.1.1 Support of Unix sockets ............................ 57
\r 8.2 Command Parsing ......................................... 57
\r 8.3 Message delivery ........................................ 57
\r 8.4 Connection 'Liveness' ................................... 58
\r 8.5 Establishing a server-client connection ................. 58
\r 8.6 Establishing a server-server connection ................. 58
\r 8.6.1 State information exchange when connecting ......... 59
\r 8.7 Terminating server-client connections ................... 59
\r 8.8 Terminating server-server connections ................... 59
\r 8.9 Tracking nickname changes ............................... 60
\r 8.10 Flood control of clients ............................... 60
\r 8.11 Non-blocking lookups ................................... 61
\r 8.11.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups ............................ 61
\r 8.11.2 Username (Ident) lookups .......................... 61
\r 8.12 Configuration file ..................................... 61
\r 8.12.1 Allowing clients to connect ....................... 62
\r 8.12.2 Operators ......................................... 62
\r 8.12.3 Allowing servers to connect ....................... 62
\r 8.12.4 Administrivia ..................................... 63
\r 8.13 Channel membership ..................................... 63
\r 9. Current problems ............................................ 63
\r 9.1 Scalability ............................................. 63
\r 9.2 Labels .................................................. 63
\r 9.2.1 Nicknames .......................................... 63
\r 9.2.2 Channels ........................................... 64
\r 9.2.3 Servers ............................................ 64
\r 9.3 Algorithms .............................................. 64
\r 10. Support and availability ................................... 64
\r 11. Security Considerations .................................... 65
\r 12. Authors' Addresses ......................................... 65
\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 3]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r1. INTRODUCTION
\r\r The IRC (Internet Relay Chat) protocol has been designed over a
\r number of years for use with text based conferencing. This document
\r describes the current IRC protocol.
\r\r The IRC protocol has been developed on systems using the TCP/IP
\r network protocol, although there is no requirement that this remain
\r the only sphere in which it operates.
\r\r IRC itself is a teleconferencing system, which (through the use of
\r the client-server model) is well-suited to running on many machines
\r in a distributed fashion. A typical setup involves a single process
\r (the server) forming a central point for clients (or other servers)
\r to connect to, performing the required message delivery/multiplexing
\r and other functions.
\r\r1.1 Servers
\r\r The server forms the backbone of IRC, providing a point to which
\r clients may connect to to talk to each other, and a point for other
\r servers to connect to, forming an IRC network. The only network
\r configuration allowed for IRC servers is that of a spanning tree [see
\r Fig. 1] where each server acts as a central node for the rest of the
\r net it sees.
\r\r\r [ Server 15 ] [ Server 13 ] [ Server 14]
\r / \ /
\r / \ /
\r [ Server 11 ] ------ [ Server 1 ] [ Server 12]
\r / \ /
\r / \ /
\r [ Server 2 ] [ Server 3 ]
\r / \ \
\r / \ \
\r [ Server 4 ] [ Server 5 ] [ Server 6 ]
\r / | \ /
\r / | \ /
\r / | \____ /
\r / | \ /
\r [ Server 7 ] [ Server 8 ] [ Server 9 ] [ Server 10 ]
\r\r :
\r [ etc. ]
\r :
\r\r [ Fig. 1. Format of IRC server network ]
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 4]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r1.2 Clients
\r\r A client is anything connecting to a server that is not another
\r server. Each client is distinguished from other clients by a unique
\r nickname having a maximum length of nine (9) characters. See the
\r protocol grammar rules for what may and may not be used in a
\r nickname. In addition to the nickname, all servers must have the
\r following information about all clients: the real name of the host
\r that the client is running on, the username of the client on that
\r host, and the server to which the client is connected.
\r\r1.2.1 Operators
\r\r To allow a reasonable amount of order to be kept within the IRC
\r network, a special class of clients (operators) is allowed to perform
\r general maintenance functions on the network. Although the powers
\r granted to an operator can be considered as 'dangerous', they are
\r nonetheless required. Operators should be able to perform basic
\r network tasks such as disconnecting and reconnecting servers as
\r needed to prevent long-term use of bad network routing. In
\r recognition of this need, the protocol discussed herein provides for
\r operators only to be able to perform such functions. See sections
\r 4.1.7 (SQUIT) and 4.3.5 (CONNECT).
\r\r A more controversial power of operators is the ability to remove a
\r user from the connected network by 'force', i.e. operators are able
\r to close the connection between any client and server. The
\r justification for this is delicate since its abuse is both
\r destructive and annoying. For further details on this type of
\r action, see section 4.6.1 (KILL).
\r\r1.3 Channels
\r\r A channel is a named group of one or more clients which will all
\r receive messages addressed to that channel. The channel is created
\r implicitly when the first client joins it, and the channel ceases to
\r exist when the last client leaves it. While channel exists, any
\r client can reference the channel using the name of the channel.
\r\r Channels names are strings (beginning with a '&' or '#' character) of
\r length up to 200 characters. Apart from the the requirement that the
\r first character being either '&' or '#'; the only restriction on a
\r channel name is that it may not contain any spaces (' '), a control G
\r (^G or ASCII 7), or a comma (',' which is used as a list item
\r separator by the protocol).
\r\r There are two types of channels allowed by this protocol. One is a
\r distributed channel which is known to all the servers that are
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 5]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r connected to the network. These channels are marked by the first
\r character being a only clients on the server where it exists may join
\r it. These are distinguished by a leading '&' character. On top of
\r these two types, there are the various channel modes available to
\r alter the characteristics of individual channels. See section 4.2.3
\r (MODE command) for more details on this.
\r\r To create a new channel or become part of an existing channel, a user
\r is required to JOIN the channel. If the channel doesn't exist prior
\r to joining, the channel is created and the creating user becomes a
\r channel operator. If the channel already exists, whether or not your
\r request to JOIN that channel is honoured depends on the current modes
\r of the channel. For example, if the channel is invite-only, (+i),
\r then you may only join if invited. As part of the protocol, a user
\r may be a part of several channels at once, but a limit of ten (10)
\r channels is recommended as being ample for both experienced and
\r novice users. See section 8.13 for more information on this.
\r\r If the IRC network becomes disjoint because of a split between two
\r servers, the channel on each side is only composed of those clients
\r which are connected to servers on the respective sides of the split,
\r possibly ceasing to exist on one side of the split. When the split
\r is healed, the connecting servers announce to each other who they
\r think is in each channel and the mode of that channel. If the
\r channel exists on both sides, the JOINs and MODEs are interpreted in
\r an inclusive manner so that both sides of the new connection will
\r agree about which clients are in the channel and what modes the
\r channel has.
\r\r1.3.1 Channel Operators
\r\r The channel operator (also referred to as a "chop" or "chanop") on a
\r given channel is considered to 'own' that channel. In recognition of
\r this status, channel operators are endowed with certain powers which
\r enable them to keep control and some sort of sanity in their channel.
\r As an owner of a channel, a channel operator is not required to have
\r reasons for their actions, although if their actions are generally
\r antisocial or otherwise abusive, it might be reasonable to ask an IRC
\r operator to intervene, or for the usersjust leave and go elsewhere
\r and form their own channel.
\r\r The commands which may only be used by channel operators are:
\r\r KICK - Eject a client from the channel
\r MODE - Change the channel's mode
\r INVITE - Invite a client to an invite-only channel (mode +i)
\r TOPIC - Change the channel topic in a mode +t channel
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 6]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r A channel operator is identified by the '@' symbol next to their
\r nickname whenever it is associated with a channel (ie replies to the
\r NAMES, WHO and WHOIS commands).
\r\r2. The IRC Specification
\r\r2.1 Overview
\r\r The protocol as described herein is for use both with server to
\r server and client to server connections. There are, however, more
\r restrictions on client connections (which are considered to be
\r untrustworthy) than on server connections.
\r\r2.2 Character codes
\r\r No specific character set is specified. The protocol is based on a a
\r set of codes which are composed of eight (8) bits, making up an
\r octet. Each message may be composed of any number of these octets;
\r however, some octet values are used for control codes which act as
\r message delimiters.
\r\r Regardless of being an 8-bit protocol, the delimiters and keywords
\r are such that protocol is mostly usable from USASCII terminal and a
\r telnet connection.
\r\r Because of IRC's scandanavian origin, the characters {}| are
\r considered to be the lower case equivalents of the characters []\,
\r respectively. This is a critical issue when determining the
\r equivalence of two nicknames.
\r\r2.3 Messages
\r\r Servers and clients send eachother messages which may or may not
\r generate a reply. If the message contains a valid command, as
\r described in later sections, the client should expect a reply as
\r specified but it is not advised to wait forever for the reply; client
\r to server and server to server communication is essentially
\r asynchronous in nature.
\r\r Each IRC message may consist of up to three main parts: the prefix
\r (optional), the command, and the command parameters (of which there
\r may be up to 15). The prefix, command, and all parameters are
\r separated by one (or more) ASCII space character(s) (0x20).
\r\r The presence of a prefix is indicated with a single leading ASCII
\r colon character (':', 0x3b), which must be the first character of the
\r message itself. There must be no gap (whitespace) between the colon
\r and the prefix. The prefix is used by servers to indicate the true
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 7]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r origin of the message. If the prefix is missing from the message, it
\r is assumed to have originated from the connection from which it was
\r received. Clients should not use prefix when sending a message from
\r themselves; if they use a prefix, the only valid prefix is the
\r registered nickname associated with the client. If the source
\r identified by the prefix cannot be found from the server's internal
\r database, or if the source is registered from a different link than
\r from which the message arrived, the server must ignore the message
\r silently.
\r\r The command must either be a valid IRC command or a three (3) digit
\r number represented in ASCII text.
\r\r IRC messages are always lines of characters terminated with a CR-LF
\r (Carriage Return - Line Feed) pair, and these messages shall not
\r exceed 512 characters in length, counting all characters including
\r the trailing CR-LF. Thus, there are 510 characters maximum allowed
\r for the command and its parameters. There is no provision for
\r continuation message lines. See section 7 for more details about
\r current implementations.
\r\r2.3.1 Message format in 'pseudo' BNF
\r\r The protocol messages must be extracted from the contiguous stream of
\r octets. The current solution is to designate two characters, CR and
\r LF, as message separators. Empty messages are silently ignored,
\r which permits use of the sequence CR-LF between messages
\r without extra problems.
\r\r The extracted message is parsed into the components <prefix>,
\r <command> and list of parameters matched either by <middle> or
\r <trailing> components.
\r\r The BNF representation for this is:
\r\r\r<message> ::= [':' <prefix> <SPACE> ] <command> <params> <crlf>
\r<prefix> ::= <servername> | <nick> [ '!' <user> ] [ '@' <host> ]
\r<command> ::= <letter> { <letter> } | <number> <number> <number>
\r<SPACE> ::= ' ' { ' ' }
\r<params> ::= <SPACE> [ ':' <trailing> | <middle> <params> ]
\r\r<middle> ::= <Any *non-empty* sequence of octets not including SPACE
\r or NUL or CR or LF, the first of which may not be ':'>
\r<trailing> ::= <Any, possibly *empty*, sequence of octets not including
\r NUL or CR or LF>
\r\r<crlf> ::= CR LF
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 8]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\rNOTES:
\r\r 1) <SPACE> is consists only of SPACE character(s) (0x20).
\r Specially notice that TABULATION, and all other control
\r characters are considered NON-WHITE-SPACE.
\r\r 2) After extracting the parameter list, all parameters are equal,
\r whether matched by <middle> or <trailing>. <Trailing> is just
\r a syntactic trick to allow SPACE within parameter.
\r\r 3) The fact that CR and LF cannot appear in parameter strings is
\r just artifact of the message framing. This might change later.
\r\r 4) The NUL character is not special in message framing, and
\r basically could end up inside a parameter, but as it would
\r cause extra complexities in normal C string handling. Therefore
\r NUL is not allowed within messages.
\r\r 5) The last parameter may be an empty string.
\r\r 6) Use of the extended prefix (['!' <user> ] ['@' <host> ]) must
\r not be used in server to server communications and is only
\r intended for server to client messages in order to provide
\r clients with more useful information about who a message is
\r from without the need for additional queries.
\r\r Most protocol messages specify additional semantics and syntax for
\r the extracted parameter strings dictated by their position in the
\r list. For example, many server commands will assume that the first
\r parameter after the command is the list of targets, which can be
\r described with:
\r\r <target> ::= <to> [ "," <target> ]
\r <to> ::= <channel> | <user> '@' <servername> | <nick> | <mask>
\r <channel> ::= ('#' | '&') <chstring>
\r <servername> ::= <host>
\r <host> ::= see RFC 952 [DNS:4] for details on allowed hostnames
\r <nick> ::= <letter> { <letter> | <number> | <special> }
\r <mask> ::= ('#' | '$') <chstring>
\r <chstring> ::= <any 8bit code except SPACE, BELL, NUL, CR, LF and
\r comma (',')>
\r\r Other parameter syntaxes are:
\r\r <user> ::= <nonwhite> { <nonwhite> }
\r <letter> ::= 'a' ... 'z' | 'A' ... 'Z'
\r <number> ::= '0' ... '9'
\r <special> ::= '-' | '[' | ']' | '\' | '`' | '^' | '{' | '}'
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 9]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r <nonwhite> ::= <any 8bit code except SPACE (0x20), NUL (0x0), CR
\r (0xd), and LF (0xa)>
\r\r2.4 Numeric replies
\r\r Most of the messages sent to the server generate a reply of some
\r sort. The most common reply is the numeric reply, used for both
\r errors and normal replies. The numeric reply must be sent as one
\r message consisting of the sender prefix, the three digit numeric, and
\r the target of the reply. A numeric reply is not allowed to originate
\r from a client; any such messages received by a server are silently
\r dropped. In all other respects, a numeric reply is just like a normal
\r message, except that the keyword is made up of 3 numeric digits
\r rather than a string of letters. A list of different replies is
\r supplied in section 6.
\r\r3. IRC Concepts.
\r\r This section is devoted to describing the actual concepts behind the
\r organization of the IRC protocol and how the current
\r implementations deliver different classes of messages.
\r\r\r\r 1--\
\r A D---4
\r 2--/ \ /
\r B----C
\r / \
\r 3 E
\r\r Servers: A, B, C, D, E Clients: 1, 2, 3, 4
\r\r [ Fig. 2. Sample small IRC network ]
\r\r3.1 One-to-one communication
\r\r Communication on a one-to-one basis is usually only performed by
\r clients, since most server-server traffic is not a result of servers
\r talking only to each other. To provide a secure means for clients to
\r talk to each other, it is required that all servers be able to send a
\r message in exactly one direction along the spanning tree in order to
\r reach any client. The path of a message being delivered is the
\r shortest path between any two points on the spanning tree.
\r\r The following examples all refer to Figure 2 above.
\r\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 10]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\rExample 1:
\r A message between clients 1 and 2 is only seen by server A, which
\r sends it straight to client 2.
\r\rExample 2:
\r A message between clients 1 and 3 is seen by servers A & B, and
\r client 3. No other clients or servers are allowed see the message.
\r\rExample 3:
\r A message between clients 2 and 4 is seen by servers A, B, C & D
\r and client 4 only.
\r\r3.2 One-to-many
\r\r The main goal of IRC is to provide a forum which allows easy and
\r efficient conferencing (one to many conversations). IRC offers
\r several means to achieve this, each serving its own purpose.
\r\r3.2.1 To a list
\r\r The least efficient style of one-to-many conversation is through
\r clients talking to a 'list' of users. How this is done is almost
\r self explanatory: the client gives a list of destinations to which
\r the message is to be delivered and the server breaks it up and
\r dispatches a separate copy of the message to each given destination.
\r This isn't as efficient as using a group since the destination list
\r is broken up and the dispatch sent without checking to make sure
\r duplicates aren't sent down each path.
\r\r3.2.2 To a group (channel)
\r\r In IRC the channel has a role equivalent to that of the multicast
\r group; their existence is dynamic (coming and going as people join
\r and leave channels) and the actual conversation carried out on a
\r channel is only sent to servers which are supporting users on a given
\r channel. If there are multiple users on a server in the same
\r channel, the message text is sent only once to that server and then
\r sent to each client on the channel. This action is then repeated for
\r each client-server combination until the original message has fanned
\r out and reached each member of the channel.
\r\r The following examples all refer to Figure 2.
\r\rExample 4:
\r Any channel with 1 client in it. Messages to the channel go to the
\r server and then nowhere else.
\r\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 11]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\rExample 5:
\r 2 clients in a channel. All messages traverse a path as if they
\r were private messages between the two clients outside a channel.
\r\rExample 6:
\r Clients 1, 2 and 3 in a channel. All messages to the channel are
\r sent to all clients and only those servers which must be traversed
\r by the message if it were a private message to a single client. If
\r client 1 sends a message, it goes back to client 2 and then via
\r server B to client 3.
\r\r3.2.3 To a host/server mask
\r\r To provide IRC operators with some mechanism to send messages to a
\r large body of related users, host and server mask messages are
\r provided. These messages are sent to users whose host or server
\r information match that of the mask. The messages are only sent to
\r locations where users are, in a fashion similar to that of channels.
\r\r3.3 One-to-all
\r\r The one-to-all type of message is better described as a broadcast
\r message, sent to all clients or servers or both. On a large network
\r of users and servers, a single message can result in a lot of traffic
\r being sent over the network in an effort to reach all of the desired
\r destinations.
\r\r For some messages, there is no option but to broadcast it to all
\r servers so that the state information held by each server is
\r reasonably consistent between servers.
\r\r3.3.1 Client-to-Client
\r\r There is no class of message which, from a single message, results in
\r a message being sent to every other client.
\r\r3.3.2 Client-to-Server
\r\r Most of the commands which result in a change of state information
\r (such as channel membership, channel mode, user status, etc) must be
\r sent to all servers by default, and this distribution may not be
\r changed by the client.
\r\r3.3.3 Server-to-Server.
\r\r While most messages between servers are distributed to all 'other'
\r servers, this is only required for any message that affects either a
\r user, channel or server. Since these are the basic items found in
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 12]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r IRC, nearly all messages originating from a server are broadcast to
\r all other connected servers.
\r\r4. Message details
\r\r On the following pages are descriptions of each message recognized by
\r the IRC server and client. All commands described in this section
\r must be implemented by any server for this protocol.
\r\r Where the reply ERR_NOSUCHSERVER is listed, it means that the
\r <server> parameter could not be found. The server must not send any
\r other replies after this for that command.
\r\r The server to which a client is connected is required to parse the
\r complete message, returning any appropriate errors. If the server
\r encounters a fatal error while parsing a message, an error must be
\r sent back to the client and the parsing terminated. A fatal error
\r may be considered to be incorrect command, a destination which is
\r otherwise unknown to the server (server, nick or channel names fit
\r this category), not enough parameters or incorrect privileges.
\r\r If a full set of parameters is presented, then each must be checked
\r for validity and appropriate responses sent back to the client. In
\r the case of messages which use parameter lists using the comma as an
\r item separator, a reply must be sent for each item.
\r\r In the examples below, some messages appear using the full format:
\r\r :Name COMMAND parameter list
\r\r Such examples represent a message from "Name" in transit between
\r servers, where it is essential to include the name of the original
\r sender of the message so remote servers may send back a reply along
\r the correct path.
\r\r4.1 Connection Registration
\r\r The commands described here are used to register a connection with an
\r IRC server as either a user or a server as well as correctly
\r disconnect.
\r\r A "PASS" command is not required for either client or server
\r connection to be registered, but it must precede the server message
\r or the latter of the NICK/USER combination. It is strongly
\r recommended that all server connections have a password in order to
\r give some level of security to the actual connections. The
\r recommended order for a client to register is as follows:
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 13]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r 1. Pass message
\r 2. Nick message
\r 3. User message
\r\r4.1.1 Password message
\r\r\r Command: PASS
\r Parameters: <password>
\r\r The PASS command is used to set a 'connection password'. The
\r password can and must be set before any attempt to register the
\r connection is made. Currently this requires that clients send a PASS
\r command before sending the NICK/USER combination and servers *must*
\r send a PASS command before any SERVER command. The password supplied
\r must match the one contained in the C/N lines (for servers) or I
\r lines (for clients). It is possible to send multiple PASS commands
\r before registering but only the last one sent is used for
\r verification and it may not be changed once registered. Numeric
\r Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED
\r\r Example:
\r\r PASS secretpasswordhere
\r\r4.1.2 Nick message
\r\r Command: NICK
\r Parameters: <nickname> [ <hopcount> ]
\r\r NICK message is used to give user a nickname or change the previous
\r one. The <hopcount> parameter is only used by servers to indicate
\r how far away a nick is from its home server. A local connection has
\r a hopcount of 0. If supplied by a client, it must be ignored.
\r\r If a NICK message arrives at a server which already knows about an
\r identical nickname for another client, a nickname collision occurs.
\r As a result of a nickname collision, all instances of the nickname
\r are removed from the server's database, and a KILL command is issued
\r to remove the nickname from all other server's database. If the NICK
\r message causing the collision was a nickname change, then the
\r original (old) nick must be removed as well.
\r\r If the server recieves an identical NICK from a client which is
\r directly connected, it may issue an ERR_NICKCOLLISION to the local
\r client, drop the NICK command, and not generate any kills.
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 14]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME
\r ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE ERR_NICKCOLLISION
\r\r Example:
\r\r NICK Wiz ; Introducing new nick "Wiz".
\r\r :WiZ NICK Kilroy ; WiZ changed his nickname to Kilroy.
\r\r4.1.3 User message
\r\r Command: USER
\r Parameters: <username> <hostname> <servername> <realname>
\r\r The USER message is used at the beginning of connection to specify
\r the username, hostname, servername and realname of s new user. It is
\r also used in communication between servers to indicate new user
\r arriving on IRC, since only after both USER and NICK have been
\r received from a client does a user become registered.
\r\r Between servers USER must to be prefixed with client's NICKname.
\r Note that hostname and servername are normally ignored by the IRC
\r server when the USER command comes from a directly connected client
\r (for security reasons), but they are used in server to server
\r communication. This means that a NICK must always be sent to a
\r remote server when a new user is being introduced to the rest of the
\r network before the accompanying USER is sent.
\r\r It must be noted that realname parameter must be the last parameter,
\r because it may contain space characters and must be prefixed with a
\r colon (':') to make sure this is recognised as such.
\r\r Since it is easy for a client to lie about its username by relying
\r solely on the USER message, the use of an "Identity Server" is
\r recommended. If the host which a user connects from has such a
\r server enabled the username is set to that as in the reply from the
\r "Identity Server".
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED
\r\r Examples:
\r\r\r USER guest tolmoon tolsun :Ronnie Reagan
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 15]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r ; User registering themselves with a
\r username of "guest" and real name
\r "Ronnie Reagan".
\r\r\r :testnick USER guest tolmoon tolsun :Ronnie Reagan
\r ; message between servers with the
\r nickname for which the USER command
\r belongs to
\r\r4.1.4 Server message
\r\r Command: SERVER
\r Parameters: <servername> <hopcount> <info>
\r\r The server message is used to tell a server that the other end of a
\r new connection is a server. This message is also used to pass server
\r data over whole net. When a new server is connected to net,
\r information about it be broadcast to the whole network. <hopcount>
\r is used to give all servers some internal information on how far away
\r all servers are. With a full server list, it would be possible to
\r construct a map of the entire server tree, but hostmasks prevent this
\r from being done.
\r\r The SERVER message must only be accepted from either (a) a connection
\r which is yet to be registered and is attempting to register as a
\r server, or (b) an existing connection to another server, in which
\r case the SERVER message is introducing a new server behind that
\r server.
\r\r Most errors that occur with the receipt of a SERVER command result in
\r the connection being terminated by the destination host (target
\r SERVER). Error replies are usually sent using the "ERROR" command
\r rather than the numeric since the ERROR command has several useful
\r properties which make it useful here.
\r\r If a SERVER message is parsed and attempts to introduce a server
\r which is already known to the receiving server, the connection from
\r which that message must be closed (following the correct procedures),
\r since a duplicate route to a server has formed and the acyclic nature
\r of the IRC tree broken.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED
\r\r Example:
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 16]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\rSERVER test.oulu.fi 1 :[tolsun.oulu.fi] Experimental server
\r ; New server test.oulu.fi introducing
\r itself and attempting to register. The
\r name in []'s is the hostname for the
\r host running test.oulu.fi.
\r\r\r:tolsun.oulu.fi SERVER csd.bu.edu 5 :BU Central Server
\r ; Server tolsun.oulu.fi is our uplink
\r for csd.bu.edu which is 5 hops away.
\r\r4.1.5 Oper
\r\r Command: OPER
\r Parameters: <user> <password>
\r\r OPER message is used by a normal user to obtain operator privileges.
\r The combination of <user> and <password> are required to gain
\r Operator privileges.
\r\r If the client sending the OPER command supplies the correct password
\r for the given user, the server then informs the rest of the network
\r of the new operator by issuing a "MODE +o" for the clients nickname.
\r\r The OPER message is client-server only.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS RPL_YOUREOPER
\r ERR_NOOPERHOST ERR_PASSWDMISMATCH
\r\r Example:
\r\r OPER foo bar ; Attempt to register as an operator
\r using a username of "foo" and "bar" as
\r the password.
\r\r4.1.6 Quit
\r\r Command: QUIT
\r Parameters: [<Quit message>]
\r\r A client session is ended with a quit message. The server must close
\r the connection to a client which sends a QUIT message. If a "Quit
\r Message" is given, this will be sent instead of the default message,
\r the nickname.
\r\r When netsplits (disconnecting of two servers) occur, the quit message
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 17]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r is composed of the names of two servers involved, separated by a
\r space. The first name is that of the server which is still connected
\r and the second name is that of the server that has become
\r disconnected.
\r\r If, for some other reason, a client connection is closed without the
\r client issuing a QUIT command (e.g. client dies and EOF occurs
\r on socket), the server is required to fill in the quit message with
\r some sort of message reflecting the nature of the event which
\r caused it to happen.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r None.
\r\r Examples:
\r\r QUIT :Gone to have lunch ; Preferred message format.
\r\r4.1.7 Server quit message
\r\r Command: SQUIT
\r Parameters: <server> <comment>
\r\r The SQUIT message is needed to tell about quitting or dead servers.
\r If a server wishes to break the connection to another server it must
\r send a SQUIT message to the other server, using the the name of the
\r other server as the server parameter, which then closes its
\r connection to the quitting server.
\r\r This command is also available operators to help keep a network of
\r IRC servers connected in an orderly fashion. Operators may also
\r issue an SQUIT message for a remote server connection. In this case,
\r the SQUIT must be parsed by each server inbetween the operator and
\r the remote server, updating the view of the network held by each
\r server as explained below.
\r\r The <comment> should be supplied by all operators who execute a SQUIT
\r for a remote server (that is not connected to the server they are
\r currently on) so that other operators are aware for the reason of
\r this action. The <comment> is also filled in by servers which may
\r place an error or similar message here.
\r\r Both of the servers which are on either side of the connection being
\r closed are required to to send out a SQUIT message (to all its other
\r server connections) for all other servers which are considered to be
\r behind that link.
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 18]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r Similarly, a QUIT message must be sent to the other connected servers
\r rest of the network on behalf of all clients behind that link. In
\r addition to this, all channel members of a channel which lost a
\r member due to the split must be sent a QUIT message.
\r\r If a server connection is terminated prematurely (e.g. the server on
\r the other end of the link died), the server which detects
\r this disconnection is required to inform the rest of the network
\r that the connection has closed and fill in the comment field
\r with something appropriate.
\r\r Numeric replies:
\r\r ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r\r Example:
\r\r SQUIT tolsun.oulu.fi :Bad Link ? ; the server link tolson.oulu.fi has
\r been terminated because of "Bad Link".
\r\r :Trillian SQUIT cm22.eng.umd.edu :Server out of control
\r ; message from Trillian to disconnect
\r "cm22.eng.umd.edu" from the net
\r because "Server out of control".
\r\r4.2 Channel operations
\r\r This group of messages is concerned with manipulating channels, their
\r properties (channel modes), and their contents (typically clients).
\r In implementing these, a number of race conditions are inevitable
\r when clients at opposing ends of a network send commands which will
\r ultimately clash. It is also required that servers keep a nickname
\r history to ensure that wherever a <nick> parameter is given, the
\r server check its history in case it has recently been changed.
\r\r4.2.1 Join message
\r\r Command: JOIN
\r Parameters: <channel>{,<channel>} [<key>{,<key>}]
\r\r The JOIN command is used by client to start listening a specific
\r channel. Whether or not a client is allowed to join a channel is
\r checked only by the server the client is connected to; all other
\r servers automatically add the user to the channel when it is received
\r from other servers. The conditions which affect this are as follows:
\r\r 1. the user must be invited if the channel is invite-only;
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 19]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r 2. the user's nick/username/hostname must not match any
\r active bans;
\r\r 3. the correct key (password) must be given if it is set.
\r\r These are discussed in more detail under the MODE command (see
\r section 4.2.3 for more details).
\r\r Once a user has joined a channel, they receive notice about all
\r commands their server receives which affect the channel. This
\r includes MODE, KICK, PART, QUIT and of course PRIVMSG/NOTICE. The
\r JOIN command needs to be broadcast to all servers so that each server
\r knows where to find the users who are on the channel. This allows
\r optimal delivery of PRIVMSG/NOTICE messages to the channel.
\r\r If a JOIN is successful, the user is then sent the channel's topic
\r (using RPL_TOPIC) and the list of users who are on the channel (using
\r RPL_NAMREPLY), which must include the user joining.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN
\r ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN ERR_BADCHANNELKEY
\r ERR_CHANNELISFULL ERR_BADCHANMASK
\r ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS
\r RPL_TOPIC
\r\r Examples:
\r\r JOIN #foobar ; join channel #foobar.
\r\r JOIN &foo fubar ; join channel &foo using key "fubar".
\r\r JOIN #foo,&bar fubar ; join channel #foo using key "fubar"
\r and &bar using no key.
\r\r JOIN #foo,#bar fubar,foobar ; join channel #foo using key "fubar".
\r and channel #bar using key "foobar".
\r\r JOIN #foo,#bar ; join channels #foo and #bar.
\r\r :WiZ JOIN #Twilight_zone ; JOIN message from WiZ
\r\r4.2.2 Part message
\r\r Command: PART
\r Parameters: <channel>{,<channel>}
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 20]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r The PART message causes the client sending the message to be removed
\r from the list of active users for all given channels listed in the
\r parameter string.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL
\r ERR_NOTONCHANNEL
\r\r Examples:
\r\r PART #twilight_zone ; leave channel "#twilight_zone"
\r\r PART #oz-ops,&group5 ; leave both channels "&group5" and
\r "#oz-ops".
\r\r4.2.3 Mode message
\r\r Command: MODE
\r\r The MODE command is a dual-purpose command in IRC. It allows both
\r usernames and channels to have their mode changed. The rationale for
\r this choice is that one day nicknames will be obsolete and the
\r equivalent property will be the channel.
\r\r When parsing MODE messages, it is recommended that the entire message
\r be parsed first and then the changes which resulted then passed on.
\r\r4.2.3.1 Channel modes
\r\r Parameters: <channel> {[+|-]|o|p|s|i|t|n|b|v} [<limit>] [<user>]
\r [<ban mask>]
\r\r The MODE command is provided so that channel operators may change the
\r characteristics of `their' channel. It is also required that servers
\r be able to change channel modes so that channel operators may be
\r created.
\r\r The various modes available for channels are as follows:
\r\r o - give/take channel operator privileges;
\r p - private channel flag;
\r s - secret channel flag;
\r i - invite-only channel flag;
\r t - topic settable by channel operator only flag;
\r n - no messages to channel from clients on the outside;
\r m - moderated channel;
\r l - set the user limit to channel;
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 21]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r b - set a ban mask to keep users out;
\r v - give/take the ability to speak on a moderated channel;
\r k - set a channel key (password).
\r\r When using the 'o' and 'b' options, a restriction on a total of three
\r per mode command has been imposed. That is, any combination of 'o'
\r and
\r\r4.2.3.2 User modes
\r\r Parameters: <nickname> {[+|-]|i|w|s|o}
\r\r The user MODEs are typically changes which affect either how the
\r client is seen by others or what 'extra' messages the client is sent.
\r A user MODE command may only be accepted if both the sender of the
\r message and the nickname given as a parameter are both the same.
\r\r The available modes are as follows:
\r\r i - marks a users as invisible;
\r s - marks a user for receipt of server notices;
\r w - user receives wallops;
\r o - operator flag.
\r\r Additional modes may be available later on.
\r\r If a user attempts to make themselves an operator using the "+o"
\r flag, the attempt should be ignored. There is no restriction,
\r however, on anyone `deopping' themselves (using "-o"). Numeric
\r Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS RPL_CHANNELMODEIS
\r ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED ERR_NOSUCHNICK
\r ERR_NOTONCHANNEL ERR_KEYSET
\r RPL_BANLIST RPL_ENDOFBANLIST
\r ERR_UNKNOWNMODE ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL
\r\r ERR_USERSDONTMATCH RPL_UMODEIS
\r ERR_UMODEUNKNOWNFLAG
\r\r Examples:
\r\r Use of Channel Modes:
\r\rMODE #Finnish +im ; Makes #Finnish channel moderated and
\r 'invite-only'.
\r\rMODE #Finnish +o Kilroy ; Gives 'chanop' privileges to Kilroy on
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 22]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r channel #Finnish.
\r\rMODE #Finnish +v Wiz ; Allow WiZ to speak on #Finnish.
\r\rMODE #Fins -s ; Removes 'secret' flag from channel
\r #Fins.
\r\rMODE #42 +k oulu ; Set the channel key to "oulu".
\r\rMODE #eu-opers +l 10 ; Set the limit for the number of users
\r on channel to 10.
\r\rMODE &oulu +b ; list ban masks set for channel.
\r\rMODE &oulu +b *!*@* ; prevent all users from joining.
\r\rMODE &oulu +b *!*@*.edu ; prevent any user from a hostname
\r matching *.edu from joining.
\r\r Use of user Modes:
\r\r:MODE WiZ -w ; turns reception of WALLOPS messages
\r off for WiZ.
\r\r:Angel MODE Angel +i ; Message from Angel to make themselves
\r invisible.
\r\rMODE WiZ -o ; WiZ 'deopping' (removing operator
\r status). The plain reverse of this
\r command ("MODE WiZ +o") must not be
\r allowed from users since would bypass
\r the OPER command.
\r\r4.2.4 Topic message
\r\r Command: TOPIC
\r Parameters: <channel> [<topic>]
\r\r The TOPIC message is used to change or view the topic of a channel.
\r The topic for channel <channel> is returned if there is no <topic>
\r given. If the <topic> parameter is present, the topic for that
\r channel will be changed, if the channel modes permit this action.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOTONCHANNEL
\r RPL_NOTOPIC RPL_TOPIC
\r ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 23]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r Examples:
\r\r :Wiz TOPIC #test :New topic ;User Wiz setting the topic.
\r\r TOPIC #test :another topic ;set the topic on #test to "another
\r topic".
\r\r TOPIC #test ; check the topic for #test.
\r\r4.2.5 Names message
\r\r Command: NAMES
\r Parameters: [<channel>{,<channel>}]
\r\r By using the NAMES command, a user can list all nicknames that are
\r visible to them on any channel that they can see. Channel names
\r which they can see are those which aren't private (+p) or secret (+s)
\r or those which they are actually on. The <channel> parameter
\r specifies which channel(s) to return information about if valid.
\r There is no error reply for bad channel names.
\r\r If no <channel> parameter is given, a list of all channels and their
\r occupants is returned. At the end of this list, a list of users who
\r are visible but either not on any channel or not on a visible channel
\r are listed as being on `channel' "*".
\r\r Numerics:
\r\r RPL_NAMREPLY RPL_ENDOFNAMES
\r\r Examples:
\r\r NAMES #twilight_zone,#42 ; list visible users on #twilight_zone
\r and #42 if the channels are visible to
\r you.
\r\r NAMES ; list all visible channels and users
\r\r4.2.6 List message
\r\r Command: LIST
\r Parameters: [<channel>{,<channel>} [<server>]]
\r\r The list message is used to list channels and their topics. If the
\r <channel> parameter is used, only the status of that channel
\r is displayed. Private channels are listed (without their
\r topics) as channel "Prv" unless the client generating the query is
\r actually on that channel. Likewise, secret channels are not listed
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 24]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r at all unless the client is a member of the channel in question.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_LISTSTART
\r RPL_LIST RPL_LISTEND
\r\r Examples:
\r\r LIST ; List all channels.
\r\r LIST #twilight_zone,#42 ; List channels #twilight_zone and #42
\r\r4.2.7 Invite message
\r\r Command: INVITE
\r Parameters: <nickname> <channel>
\r\r The INVITE message is used to invite users to a channel. The
\r parameter <nickname> is the nickname of the person to be invited to
\r the target channel <channel>. There is no requirement that the
\r channel the target user is being invited to must exist or be a valid
\r channel. To invite a user to a channel which is invite only (MODE
\r +i), the client sending the invite must be recognised as being a
\r channel operator on the given channel.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHNICK
\r ERR_NOTONCHANNEL ERR_USERONCHANNEL
\r ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED
\r RPL_INVITING RPL_AWAY
\r\r Examples:
\r\r :Angel INVITE Wiz #Dust ; User Angel inviting WiZ to channel
\r #Dust
\r\r INVITE Wiz #Twilight_Zone ; Command to invite WiZ to
\r #Twilight_zone
\r\r4.2.8 Kick command
\r\r Command: KICK
\r Parameters: <channel> <user> [<comment>]
\r\r The KICK command can be used to forcibly remove a user from a
\r channel. It 'kicks them out' of the channel (forced PART).
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 25]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r Only a channel operator may kick another user out of a channel.
\r Each server that receives a KICK message checks that it is valid
\r (ie the sender is actually a channel operator) before removing
\r the victim from the channel.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL
\r ERR_BADCHANMASK ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED
\r ERR_NOTONCHANNEL
\r\r Examples:
\r\rKICK &Melbourne Matthew ; Kick Matthew from &Melbourne
\r\rKICK #Finnish John :Speaking English
\r ; Kick John from #Finnish using
\r "Speaking English" as the reason
\r (comment).
\r\r:WiZ KICK #Finnish John ; KICK message from WiZ to remove John
\r from channel #Finnish
\r\rNOTE:
\r It is possible to extend the KICK command parameters to the
\rfollowing:
\r\r<channel>{,<channel>} <user>{,<user>} [<comment>]
\r\r4.3 Server queries and commands
\r\r The server query group of commands has been designed to return
\r information about any server which is connected to the network. All
\r servers connected must respond to these queries and respond
\r correctly. Any invalid response (or lack thereof) must be considered
\r a sign of a broken server and it must be disconnected/disabled as
\r soon as possible until the situation is remedied.
\r\r In these queries, where a parameter appears as "<server>", it will
\r usually mean it can be a nickname or a server or a wildcard name of
\r some sort. For each parameter, however, only one query and set of
\r replies is to be generated.
\r\r4.3.1 Version message
\r\r Command: VERSION
\r Parameters: [<server>]
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 26]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r The VERSION message is used to query the version of the server
\r program. An optional parameter <server> is used to query the version
\r of the server program which a client is not directly connected to.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_VERSION
\r\r Examples:
\r\r :Wiz VERSION *.se ; message from Wiz to check the version
\r of a server matching "*.se"
\r\r VERSION tolsun.oulu.fi ; check the version of server
\r "tolsun.oulu.fi".
\r\r4.3.2 Stats message
\r\r Command: STATS
\r Parameters: [<query> [<server>]]
\r\r The stats message is used to query statistics of certain server. If
\r <server> parameter is omitted, only the end of stats reply is sent
\r back. The implementation of this command is highly dependent on the
\r server which replies, although the server must be able to supply
\r information as described by the queries below (or similar).
\r\r A query may be given by any single letter which is only checked by
\r the destination server (if given as the <server> parameter) and is
\r otherwise passed on by intermediate servers, ignored and unaltered.
\r The following queries are those found in the current IRC
\r implementation and provide a large portion of the setup information
\r for that server. Although these may not be supported in the same way
\r by other versions, all servers should be able to supply a valid reply
\r to a STATS query which is consistent with the reply formats currently
\r used and the purpose of the query.
\r\r The currently supported queries are:
\r\r c - returns a list of servers which the server may connect
\r to or allow connections from;
\r h - returns a list of servers which are either forced to be
\r treated as leaves or allowed to act as hubs;
\r i - returns a list of hosts which the server allows a client
\r to connect from;
\r k - returns a list of banned username/hostname combinations
\r for that server;
\r l - returns a list of the server's connections, showing how
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 27]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r long each connection has been established and the traffic
\r over that connection in bytes and messages for each
\r direction;
\r m - returns a list of commands supported by the server and
\r the usage count for each if the usage count is non zero;
\r o - returns a list of hosts from which normal clients may
\r become operators;
\r y - show Y (Class) lines from server's configuration file;
\r u - returns a string showing how long the server has been up.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r RPL_STATSCLINE RPL_STATSNLINE
\r RPL_STATSILINE RPL_STATSKLINE
\r RPL_STATSQLINE RPL_STATSLLINE
\r RPL_STATSLINKINFO RPL_STATSUPTIME
\r RPL_STATSCOMMANDS RPL_STATSOLINE
\r RPL_STATSHLINE RPL_ENDOFSTATS
\r\r Examples:
\r\rSTATS m ; check the command usage for the server
\r you are connected to
\r\r:Wiz STATS c eff.org ; request by WiZ for C/N line
\r information from server eff.org
\r\r4.3.3 Links message
\r\r Command: LINKS
\r Parameters: [[<remote server>] <server mask>]
\r\r With LINKS, a user can list all servers which are known by the server
\r answering the query. The returned list of servers must match the
\r mask, or if no mask is given, the full list is returned.
\r\r If <remote server> is given in addition to <server mask>, the LINKS
\r command is forwarded to the first server found that matches that name
\r (if any), and that server is then required to answer the query.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r RPL_LINKS RPL_ENDOFLINKS
\r\r Examples:
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 28]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\rLINKS *.au ; list all servers which have a name
\r that matches *.au;
\r\r:WiZ LINKS *.bu.edu *.edu ; LINKS message from WiZ to the first
\r server matching *.edu for a list of
\r servers matching *.bu.edu.
\r\r4.3.4 Time message
\r\r Command: TIME
\r Parameters: [<server>]
\r\r The time message is used to query local time from the specified
\r server. If the server parameter is not given, the server handling the
\r command must reply to the query.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_TIME
\r\r Examples:
\r\r TIME tolsun.oulu.fi ; check the time on the server
\r "tolson.oulu.fi"
\r\r Angel TIME *.au ; user angel checking the time on a
\r server matching "*.au"
\r\r4.3.5 Connect message
\r\r Command: CONNECT
\r Parameters: <target server> [<port> [<remote server>]]
\r\r The CONNECT command can be used to force a server to try to establish
\r a new connection to another server immediately. CONNECT is a
\r privileged command and is to be available only to IRC Operators. If
\r a remote server is given then the CONNECT attempt is made by that
\r server to <target server> and <port>.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_NOPRIVILEGES
\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
\r\r Examples:
\r\rCONNECT tolsun.oulu.fi ; Attempt to connect a server to
\r tolsun.oulu.fi
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 29]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r:WiZ CONNECT eff.org 6667 csd.bu.edu
\r ; CONNECT attempt by WiZ to get servers
\r eff.org and csd.bu.edu connected on port
\r 6667.
\r\r4.3.6 Trace message
\r\r Command: TRACE
\r Parameters: [<server>]
\r\r TRACE command is used to find the route to specific server. Each
\r server that processes this message must tell the sender about it by
\r sending a reply indicating it is a pass-through link, forming a chain
\r of replies similar to that gained from using "traceroute". After
\r sending this reply back, it must then send the TRACE message to the
\r next server until given server is reached. If the <server> parameter
\r is omitted, it is recommended that TRACE command send a message to
\r the sender telling which servers the current server has direct
\r connection to.
\r\r If the destination given by "<server>" is an actual server, then the
\r destination server is required to report all servers and users which
\r are connected to it, although only operators are permitted to see
\r users present. If the destination given by <server> is a nickname,
\r they only a reply for that nickname is given.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r\r If the TRACE message is destined for another server, all intermediate
\r servers must return a RPL_TRACELINK reply to indicate that the TRACE
\r passed through it and where its going next.
\r\r RPL_TRACELINK
\r A TRACE reply may be composed of any number of the following numeric
\r replies.
\r\r RPL_TRACECONNECTING RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE
\r RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN RPL_TRACEOPERATOR
\r RPL_TRACEUSER RPL_TRACESERVER
\r RPL_TRACESERVICE RPL_TRACENEWTYPE
\r RPL_TRACECLASS
\r\r Examples:
\r\rTRACE *.oulu.fi ; TRACE to a server matching *.oulu.fi
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 30]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r:WiZ TRACE AngelDust ; TRACE issued by WiZ to nick AngelDust
\r\r4.3.7 Admin command
\r\r Command: ADMIN
\r Parameters: [<server>]
\r\r The admin message is used to find the name of the administrator of
\r the given server, or current server if <server> parameter is omitted.
\r Each server must have the ability to forward ADMIN messages to other
\r servers.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r RPL_ADMINME RPL_ADMINLOC1
\r RPL_ADMINLOC2 RPL_ADMINEMAIL
\r\r Examples:
\r\r ADMIN tolsun.oulu.fi ; request an ADMIN reply from
\r tolsun.oulu.fi
\r\r :WiZ ADMIN *.edu ; ADMIN request from WiZ for first
\r server found to match *.edu.
\r\r4.3.8 Info command
\r\r Command: INFO
\r Parameters: [<server>]
\r\r The INFO command is required to return information which describes
\r the server: its version, when it was compiled, the patchlevel, when
\r it was started, and any other miscellaneous information which may be
\r considered to be relevant.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r RPL_INFO RPL_ENDOFINFO
\r\r Examples:
\r\r INFO csd.bu.edu ; request an INFO reply from
\r csd.bu.edu
\r\r :Avalon INFO *.fi ; INFO request from Avalon for first
\r server found to match *.fi.
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 31]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r INFO Angel ; request info from the server that
\r Angel is connected to.
\r\r4.4 Sending messages
\r\r The main purpose of the IRC protocol is to provide a base for clients
\r to communicate with each other. PRIVMSG and NOTICE are the only
\r messages available which actually perform delivery of a text message
\r from one client to another - the rest just make it possible and try
\r to ensure it happens in a reliable and structured manner.
\r\r4.4.1 Private messages
\r\r Command: PRIVMSG
\r Parameters: <receiver>{,<receiver>} <text to be sent>
\r\r PRIVMSG is used to send private messages between users. <receiver>
\r is the nickname of the receiver of the message. <receiver> can also
\r be a list of names or channels separated with commas.
\r\r The <receiver> parameter may also me a host mask (#mask) or server
\r mask ($mask). In both cases the server will only send the PRIVMSG
\r to those who have a server or host matching the mask. The mask must
\r have at least 1 (one) "." in it and no wildcards following the
\r last ".". This requirement exists to prevent people sending messages
\r to "#*" or "$*", which would broadcast to all users; from
\r experience, this is abused more than used responsibly and properly.
\r Wildcards are the '*' and '?' characters. This extension to
\r the PRIVMSG command is only available to Operators.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NORECIPIENT ERR_NOTEXTTOSEND
\r ERR_CANNOTSENDTOCHAN ERR_NOTOPLEVEL
\r ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS
\r ERR_NOSUCHNICK
\r RPL_AWAY
\r\r Examples:
\r\r:Angel PRIVMSG Wiz :Hello are you receiving this message ?
\r ; Message from Angel to Wiz.
\r\rPRIVMSG Angel :yes I'm receiving it !receiving it !'u>(768u+1n) .br ;
\r Message to Angel.
\r\rPRIVMSG jto@tolsun.oulu.fi :Hello !
\r ; Message to a client on server
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 32]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r tolsun.oulu.fi with username of "jto".
\r\rPRIVMSG $*.fi :Server tolsun.oulu.fi rebooting.
\r ; Message to everyone on a server which
\r has a name matching *.fi.
\r\rPRIVMSG #*.edu :NSFNet is undergoing work, expect interruptions
\r ; Message to all users who come from a
\r host which has a name matching *.edu.
\r\r4.4.2 Notice
\r\r Command: NOTICE
\r Parameters: <nickname> <text>
\r\r The NOTICE message is used similarly to PRIVMSG. The difference
\r between NOTICE and PRIVMSG is that automatic replies must never be
\r sent in response to a NOTICE message. This rule applies to servers
\r too - they must not send any error reply back to the client on
\r receipt of a notice. The object of this rule is to avoid loops
\r between a client automatically sending something in response to
\r something it received. This is typically used by automatons (clients
\r with either an AI or other interactive program controlling their
\r actions) which are always seen to be replying lest they end up in a
\r loop with another automaton.
\r\r See PRIVMSG for more details on replies and examples.
\r\r4.5 User based queries
\r\r User queries are a group of commands which are primarily concerned
\r with finding details on a particular user or group users. When using
\r wildcards with any of these commands, if they match, they will only
\r return information on users who are 'visible' to you. The visibility
\r of a user is determined as a combination of the user's mode and the
\r common set of channels you are both on.
\r\r4.5.1 Who query
\r\r Command: WHO
\r Parameters: [<name> [<o>]]
\r\r The WHO message is used by a client to generate a query which returns
\r a list of information which 'matches' the <name> parameter given by
\r the client. In the absence of the <name> parameter, all visible
\r (users who aren't invisible (user mode +i) and who don't have a
\r common channel with the requesting client) are listed. The same
\r result can be achieved by using a <name> of "0" or any wildcard which
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 33]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r will end up matching every entry possible.
\r\r The <name> passed to WHO is matched against users' host, server, real
\r name and nickname if the channel <name> cannot be found.
\r\r If the "o" parameter is passed only operators are returned according
\r to the name mask supplied.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r RPL_WHOREPLY RPL_ENDOFWHO
\r\r Examples:
\r\r WHO *.fi ; List all users who match against
\r "*.fi".
\r\r WHO jto* o ; List all users with a match against
\r "jto*" if they are an operator.
\r\r4.5.2 Whois query
\r\r Command: WHOIS
\r Parameters: [<server>] <nickmask>[,<nickmask>[,...]]
\r\r This message is used to query information about particular user. The
\r server will answer this message with several numeric messages
\r indicating different statuses of each user which matches the nickmask
\r (if you are entitled to see them). If no wildcard is present in the
\r <nickmask>, any information about that nick which you are allowed to
\r see is presented. A comma (',') separated list of nicknames may be
\r given.
\r\r The latter version sends the query to a specific server. It is
\r useful if you want to know how long the user in question has been
\r idle as only local server (ie. the server the user is directly
\r connected to) knows that information, while everything else is
\r globally known.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN
\r RPL_WHOISUSER RPL_WHOISCHANNELS
\r RPL_WHOISCHANNELS RPL_WHOISSERVER
\r RPL_AWAY RPL_WHOISOPERATOR
\r RPL_WHOISIDLE ERR_NOSUCHNICK
\r RPL_ENDOFWHOIS
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 34]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r Examples:
\r\r WHOIS wiz ; return available user information
\r about nick WiZ
\r\r WHOIS eff.org trillian ; ask server eff.org for user
\r information about trillian
\r\r4.5.3 Whowas
\r\r Command: WHOWAS
\r Parameters: <nickname> [<count> [<server>]]
\r\r Whowas asks for information about a nickname which no longer exists.
\r This may either be due to a nickname change or the user leaving IRC.
\r In response to this query, the server searches through its nickname
\r history, looking for any nicks which are lexically the same (no wild
\r card matching here). The history is searched backward, returning the
\r most recent entry first. If there are multiple entries, up to
\r <count> replies will be returned (or all of them if no <count>
\r parameter is given). If a non-positive number is passed as being
\r <count>, then a full search is done.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK
\r RPL_WHOWASUSER RPL_WHOISSERVER
\r RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS
\r\r Examples:
\r\r WHOWAS Wiz ; return all information in the nick
\r history about nick "WiZ";
\r\r WHOWAS Mermaid 9 ; return at most, the 9 most recent
\r entries in the nick history for
\r "Mermaid";
\r\r WHOWAS Trillian 1 *.edu ; return the most recent history for
\r "Trillian" from the first server found
\r to match "*.edu".
\r\r4.6 Miscellaneous messages
\r\r Messages in this category do not fit into any of the above categories
\r but are nonetheless still a part of and required by the protocol.
\r\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 35]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r4.6.1 Kill message
\r\r Command: KILL
\r Parameters: <nickname> <comment>
\r\r The KILL message is used to cause a client-server connection to be
\r closed by the server which has the actual connection. KILL is used
\r by servers when they encounter a duplicate entry in the list of valid
\r nicknames and is used to remove both entries. It is also available
\r to operators.
\r\r Clients which have automatic reconnect algorithms effectively make
\r this command useless since the disconnection is only brief. It does
\r however break the flow of data and can be used to stop large amounts
\r of being abused, any user may elect to receive KILL messages
\r generated for others to keep an 'eye' on would be trouble spots.
\r\r In an arena where nicknames are required to be globally unique at all
\r times, KILL messages are sent whenever 'duplicates' are detected
\r (that is an attempt to register two users with the same nickname) in
\r the hope that both of them will disappear and only 1 reappear.
\r\r The comment given must reflect the actual reason for the KILL. For
\r server-generated KILLs it usually is made up of details concerning
\r the origins of the two conflicting nicknames. For users it is left
\r up to them to provide an adequate reason to satisfy others who see
\r it. To prevent/discourage fake KILLs from being generated to hide
\r the identify of the KILLer, the comment also shows a 'kill-path'
\r which is updated by each server it passes through, each prepending
\r its name to the path.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
\r ERR_NOSUCHNICK ERR_CANTKILLSERVER
\r\r\r KILL David (csd.bu.edu <- tolsun.oulu.fi)
\r ; Nickname collision between csd.bu.edu
\r and tolson.oulu.fi
\r\r\r NOTE:
\r It is recommended that only Operators be allowed to kill other users
\r with KILL message. In an ideal world not even operators would need
\r to do this and it would be left to servers to deal with.
\r\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 36]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r4.6.2 Ping message
\r\r Command: PING
\r Parameters: <server1> [<server2>]
\r\r The PING message is used to test the presence of an active client at
\r the other end of the connection. A PING message is sent at regular
\r intervals if no other activity detected coming from a connection. If
\r a connection fails to respond to a PING command within a set amount
\r of time, that connection is closed.
\r\r Any client which receives a PING message must respond to <server1>
\r (server which sent the PING message out) as quickly as possible with
\r an appropriate PONG message to indicate it is still there and alive.
\r Servers should not respond to PING commands but rely on PINGs from
\r the other end of the connection to indicate the connection is alive.
\r If the <server2> parameter is specified, the PING message gets
\r forwarded there.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOORIGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r\r Examples:
\r\r PING tolsun.oulu.fi ; server sending a PING message to
\r another server to indicate it is still
\r alive.
\r\r PING WiZ ; PING message being sent to nick WiZ
\r\r4.6.3 Pong message
\r\r Command: PONG
\r Parameters: <daemon> [<daemon2>]
\r\r PONG message is a reply to ping message. If parameter <daemon2> is
\r given this message must be forwarded to given daemon. The <daemon>
\r parameter is the name of the daemon who has responded to PING message
\r and generated this message.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOORIGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r\r Examples:
\r\r PONG csd.bu.edu tolsun.oulu.fi ; PONG message from csd.bu.edu to
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 37]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r tolsun.oulu.fi
\r\r4.6.4 Error
\r\r Command: ERROR
\r Parameters: <error message>
\r\r The ERROR command is for use by servers when reporting a serious or
\r fatal error to its operators. It may also be sent from one server to
\r another but must not be accepted from any normal unknown clients.
\r\r An ERROR message is for use for reporting errors which occur with a
\r server-to-server link only. An ERROR message is sent to the server
\r at the other end (which sends it to all of its connected operators)
\r and to all operators currently connected. It is not to be passed
\r onto any other servers by a server if it is received from a server.
\r\r When a server sends a received ERROR message to its operators, the
\r message should be encapsulated inside a NOTICE message, indicating
\r that the client was not responsible for the error.
\r\r Numerics:
\r\r None.
\r\r Examples:
\r\r ERROR :Server *.fi already exists; ERROR message to the other server
\r which caused this error.
\r\r NOTICE WiZ :ERROR from csd.bu.edu -- Server *.fi already exists
\r ; Same ERROR message as above but sent
\r to user WiZ on the other server.
\r\r5. OPTIONALS
\r\r This section describes OPTIONAL messages. They are not required in a
\r working server implementation of the protocol described herein. In
\r the absence of the option, an error reply message must be generated
\r or an unknown command error. If the message is destined for another
\r server to answer then it must be passed on (elementary parsing
\r required) The allocated numerics for this are listed with the
\r messages below.
\r\r5.1 Away
\r\r Command: AWAY
\r Parameters: [message]
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 38]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r With the AWAY message, clients can set an automatic reply string for
\r any PRIVMSG commands directed at them (not to a channel they are on).
\r The automatic reply is sent by the server to client sending the
\r PRIVMSG command. The only replying server is the one to which the
\r sending client is connected to.
\r\r The AWAY message is used either with one parameter (to set an AWAY
\r message) or with no parameters (to remove the AWAY message).
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r RPL_UNAWAY RPL_NOWAWAY
\r\r Examples:
\r\r AWAY :Gone to lunch. Back in 5 ; set away message to "Gone to lunch.
\r Back in 5".
\r\r :WiZ AWAY ; unmark WiZ as being away.
\r\r\r5.2 Rehash message
\r\r Command: REHASH
\r Parameters: None
\r\r The rehash message can be used by the operator to force the server to
\r re-read and process its configuration file.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r RPL_REHASHING ERR_NOPRIVILEGES
\r\rExamples:
\r\rREHASH ; message from client with operator
\r status to server asking it to reread its
\r configuration file.
\r\r5.3 Restart message
\r\r Command: RESTART
\r Parameters: None
\r\r The restart message can only be used by an operator to force a server
\r restart itself. This message is optional since it may be viewed as a
\r risk to allow arbitrary people to connect to a server as an operator
\r and execute this command, causing (at least) a disruption to service.
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 39]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r The RESTART command must always be fully processed by the server to
\r which the sending client is connected and not be passed onto other
\r connected servers.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOPRIVILEGES
\r\r Examples:
\r\r RESTART ; no parameters required.
\r\r5.4 Summon message
\r\r Command: SUMMON
\r Parameters: <user> [<server>]
\r\r The SUMMON command can be used to give users who are on a host
\r running an IRC server a message asking them to please join IRC. This
\r message is only sent if the target server (a) has SUMMON enabled, (b)
\r the user is logged in and (c) the server process can write to the
\r user's tty (or similar).
\r\r If no <server> parameter is given it tries to summon <user> from the
\r server the client is connected to is assumed as the target.
\r\r If summon is not enabled in a server, it must return the
\r ERR_SUMMONDISABLED numeric and pass the summon message onwards.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NORECIPIENT ERR_FILEERROR
\r ERR_NOLOGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r RPL_SUMMONING
\r\r Examples:
\r\r SUMMON jto ; summon user jto on the server's host
\r\r SUMMON jto tolsun.oulu.fi ; summon user jto on the host which a
\r server named "tolsun.oulu.fi" is
\r running.
\r\r\r5.5 Users
\r\r Command: USERS
\r Parameters: [<server>]
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 40]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r The USERS command returns a list of users logged into the server in a
\r similar format to who(1), rusers(1) and finger(1). Some people
\r may disable this command on their server for security related
\r reasons. If disabled, the correct numeric must be returned to
\r indicate this.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_FILEERROR
\r RPL_USERSSTART RPL_USERS
\r RPL_NOUSERS RPL_ENDOFUSERS
\r ERR_USERSDISABLED
\r\r Disabled Reply:
\r\r ERR_USERSDISABLED
\r\r Examples:
\r\rUSERS eff.org ; request a list of users logged in on
\r server eff.org
\r\r:John USERS tolsun.oulu.fi ; request from John for a list of users
\r logged in on server tolsun.oulu.fi
\r\r5.6 Operwall message
\r\r Command: WALLOPS
\r Parameters: Text to be sent to all operators currently online
\r\r Sends a message to all operators currently online. After
\r implementing WALLOPS as a user command it was found that it was
\r often and commonly abused as a means of sending a message to a lot
\r of people (much similar to WALL). Due to this it is recommended
\r that the current implementation of WALLOPS be used as an
\r example by allowing and recognising only servers as the senders of
\r WALLOPS.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
\r\r Examples:
\r\r :csd.bu.edu WALLOPS :Connect '*.uiuc.edu 6667' from Joshua; WALLOPS
\r message from csd.bu.edu announcing a
\r CONNECT message it received and acted
\r upon from Joshua.
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 41]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r5.7 Userhost message
\r\r Command: USERHOST
\r Parameters: <nickname>{<space><nickname>}
\r\r The USERHOST command takes a list of up to 5 nicknames, each
\r separated by a space character and returns a list of information
\r about each nickname that it found. The returned list has each reply
\r separated by a space.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r RPL_USERHOST ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
\r\r Examples:
\r\r USERHOST Wiz Michael Marty p ;USERHOST request for information on
\r nicks "Wiz", "Michael", "Marty" and "p"
\r\r5.8 Ison message
\r\r Command: ISON
\r Parameters: <nickname>{<space><nickname>}
\r\r The ISON command was implemented to provide a quick and efficient
\r means to get a response about whether a given nickname was currently
\r on IRC. ISON only takes one (1) parameter: a space-separated list of
\r nicks. For each nickname in the list that is present, the server
\r adds that to its reply string. Thus the reply string may return
\r empty (none of the given nicks are present), an exact copy of the
\r parameter string (all of them present) or as any other subset of the
\r set of nicks given in the parameter. The only limit on the number
\r of nicks that may be checked is that the combined length must not be
\r too large as to cause the server to chop it off so it fits in 512
\r characters.
\r\r ISON is only be processed by the server local to the client sending
\r the command and thus not passed onto other servers for further
\r processing.
\r\r Numeric Replies:
\r\r RPL_ISON ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
\r\r Examples:
\r\r ISON phone trillian WiZ jarlek Avalon Angel Monstah
\r ; Sample ISON request for 7 nicks.
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 42]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r6. REPLIES
\r\r The following is a list of numeric replies which are generated in
\r response to the commands given above. Each numeric is given with its
\r number, name and reply string.
\r\r6.1 Error Replies.
\r\r 401 ERR_NOSUCHNICK
\r "<nickname> :No such nick/channel"
\r\r - Used to indicate the nickname parameter supplied to a
\r command is currently unused.
\r\r 402 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER
\r "<server name> :No such server"
\r\r - Used to indicate the server name given currently
\r doesn't exist.
\r\r 403 ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL
\r "<channel name> :No such channel"
\r\r - Used to indicate the given channel name is invalid.
\r\r 404 ERR_CANNOTSENDTOCHAN
\r "<channel name> :Cannot send to channel"
\r\r - Sent to a user who is either (a) not on a channel
\r which is mode +n or (b) not a chanop (or mode +v) on
\r a channel which has mode +m set and is trying to send
\r a PRIVMSG message to that channel.
\r\r 405 ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS
\r "<channel name> :You have joined too many \
\r channels"
\r - Sent to a user when they have joined the maximum
\r number of allowed channels and they try to join
\r another channel.
\r\r 406 ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK
\r "<nickname> :There was no such nickname"
\r\r - Returned by WHOWAS to indicate there is no history
\r information for that nickname.
\r\r 407 ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS
\r "<target> :Duplicate recipients. No message \
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 43]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r delivered"
\r\r - Returned to a client which is attempting to send a
\r PRIVMSG/NOTICE using the user@host destination format
\r and for a user@host which has several occurrences.
\r\r 409 ERR_NOORIGIN
\r ":No origin specified"
\r\r - PING or PONG message missing the originator parameter
\r which is required since these commands must work
\r without valid prefixes.
\r\r 411 ERR_NORECIPIENT
\r ":No recipient given (<command>)"
\r 412 ERR_NOTEXTTOSEND
\r ":No text to send"
\r 413 ERR_NOTOPLEVEL
\r "<mask> :No toplevel domain specified"
\r 414 ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL
\r "<mask> :Wildcard in toplevel domain"
\r\r - 412 - 414 are returned by PRIVMSG to indicate that
\r the message wasn't delivered for some reason.
\r ERR_NOTOPLEVEL and ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL are errors that
\r are returned when an invalid use of
\r "PRIVMSG $<server>" or "PRIVMSG #<host>" is attempted.
\r\r 421 ERR_UNKNOWNCOMMAND
\r "<command> :Unknown command"
\r\r - Returned to a registered client to indicate that the
\r command sent is unknown by the server.
\r\r 422 ERR_NOMOTD
\r ":MOTD File is missing"
\r\r - Server's MOTD file could not be opened by the server.
\r\r 423 ERR_NOADMININFO
\r "<server> :No administrative info available"
\r\r - Returned by a server in response to an ADMIN message
\r when there is an error in finding the appropriate
\r information.
\r\r 424 ERR_FILEERROR
\r ":File error doing <file op> on <file>"
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 44]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r - Generic error message used to report a failed file
\r operation during the processing of a message.
\r\r 431 ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN
\r ":No nickname given"
\r\r - Returned when a nickname parameter expected for a
\r command and isn't found.
\r\r 432 ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME
\r "<nick> :Erroneus nickname"
\r\r - Returned after receiving a NICK message which contains
\r characters which do not fall in the defined set. See
\r section x.x.x for details on valid nicknames.
\r\r 433 ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE
\r "<nick> :Nickname is already in use"
\r\r - Returned when a NICK message is processed that results
\r in an attempt to change to a currently existing
\r nickname.
\r\r 436 ERR_NICKCOLLISION
\r "<nick> :Nickname collision KILL"
\r\r - Returned by a server to a client when it detects a
\r nickname collision (registered of a NICK that
\r already exists by another server).
\r\r 441 ERR_USERNOTINCHANNEL
\r "<nick> <channel> :They aren't on that channel"
\r\r - Returned by the server to indicate that the target
\r user of the command is not on the given channel.
\r\r 442 ERR_NOTONCHANNEL
\r "<channel> :You're not on that channel"
\r\r - Returned by the server whenever a client tries to
\r perform a channel effecting command for which the
\r client isn't a member.
\r\r 443 ERR_USERONCHANNEL
\r "<user> <channel> :is already on channel"
\r\r - Returned when a client tries to invite a user to a
\r channel they are already on.
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 45]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r 444 ERR_NOLOGIN
\r "<user> :User not logged in"
\r\r - Returned by the summon after a SUMMON command for a
\r user was unable to be performed since they were not
\r logged in.
\r\r 445 ERR_SUMMONDISABLED
\r ":SUMMON has been disabled"
\r\r - Returned as a response to the SUMMON command. Must be
\r returned by any server which does not implement it.
\r\r 446 ERR_USERSDISABLED
\r ":USERS has been disabled"
\r\r - Returned as a response to the USERS command. Must be
\r returned by any server which does not implement it.
\r\r 451 ERR_NOTREGISTERED
\r ":You have not registered"
\r\r - Returned by the server to indicate that the client
\r must be registered before the server will allow it
\r to be parsed in detail.
\r\r 461 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS
\r "<command> :Not enough parameters"
\r\r - Returned by the server by numerous commands to
\r indicate to the client that it didn't supply enough
\r parameters.
\r\r 462 ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED
\r ":You may not reregister"
\r\r - Returned by the server to any link which tries to
\r change part of the registered details (such as
\r password or user details from second USER message).
\r\r\r 463 ERR_NOPERMFORHOST
\r ":Your host isn't among the privileged"
\r\r - Returned to a client which attempts to register with
\r a server which does not been setup to allow
\r connections from the host the attempted connection
\r is tried.
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 46]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r 464 ERR_PASSWDMISMATCH
\r ":Password incorrect"
\r\r - Returned to indicate a failed attempt at registering
\r a connection for which a password was required and
\r was either not given or incorrect.
\r\r 465 ERR_YOUREBANNEDCREEP
\r ":You are banned from this server"
\r\r - Returned after an attempt to connect and register
\r yourself with a server which has been setup to
\r explicitly deny connections to you.
\r\r 467 ERR_KEYSET
\r "<channel> :Channel key already set"
\r 471 ERR_CHANNELISFULL
\r "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+l)"
\r 472 ERR_UNKNOWNMODE
\r "<char> :is unknown mode char to me"
\r 473 ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN
\r "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+i)"
\r 474 ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN
\r "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+b)"
\r 475 ERR_BADCHANNELKEY
\r "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+k)"
\r 481 ERR_NOPRIVILEGES
\r ":Permission Denied- You're not an IRC operator"
\r\r - Any command requiring operator privileges to operate
\r must return this error to indicate the attempt was
\r unsuccessful.
\r\r 482 ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED
\r "<channel> :You're not channel operator"
\r\r - Any command requiring 'chanop' privileges (such as
\r MODE messages) must return this error if the client
\r making the attempt is not a chanop on the specified
\r channel.
\r\r 483 ERR_CANTKILLSERVER
\r ":You cant kill a server!"
\r\r - Any attempts to use the KILL command on a server
\r are to be refused and this error returned directly
\r to the client.
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 47]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r 491 ERR_NOOPERHOST
\r ":No O-lines for your host"
\r\r - If a client sends an OPER message and the server has
\r not been configured to allow connections from the
\r client's host as an operator, this error must be
\r returned.
\r\r 501 ERR_UMODEUNKNOWNFLAG
\r ":Unknown MODE flag"
\r\r - Returned by the server to indicate that a MODE
\r message was sent with a nickname parameter and that
\r the a mode flag sent was not recognized.
\r\r 502 ERR_USERSDONTMATCH
\r ":Cant change mode for other users"
\r\r - Error sent to any user trying to view or change the
\r user mode for a user other than themselves.
\r\r6.2 Command responses.
\r\r 300 RPL_NONE
\r Dummy reply number. Not used.
\r\r 302 RPL_USERHOST
\r ":[<reply>{<space><reply>}]"
\r\r - Reply format used by USERHOST to list replies to
\r the query list. The reply string is composed as
\r follows:
\r\r <reply> ::= <nick>['*'] '=' <'+'|'-'><hostname>
\r\r The '*' indicates whether the client has registered
\r as an Operator. The '-' or '+' characters represent
\r whether the client has set an AWAY message or not
\r respectively.
\r\r 303 RPL_ISON
\r ":[<nick> {<space><nick>}]"
\r\r - Reply format used by ISON to list replies to the
\r query list.
\r\r 301 RPL_AWAY
\r "<nick> :<away message>"
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 48]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r 305 RPL_UNAWAY
\r ":You are no longer marked as being away"
\r 306 RPL_NOWAWAY
\r ":You have been marked as being away"
\r\r - These replies are used with the AWAY command (if
\r allowed). RPL_AWAY is sent to any client sending a
\r PRIVMSG to a client which is away. RPL_AWAY is only
\r sent by the server to which the client is connected.
\r Replies RPL_UNAWAY and RPL_NOWAWAY are sent when the
\r client removes and sets an AWAY message.
\r\r 311 RPL_WHOISUSER
\r "<nick> <user> <host> * :<real name>"
\r 312 RPL_WHOISSERVER
\r "<nick> <server> :<server info>"
\r 313 RPL_WHOISOPERATOR
\r "<nick> :is an IRC operator"
\r 317 RPL_WHOISIDLE
\r "<nick> <integer> :seconds idle"
\r 318 RPL_ENDOFWHOIS
\r "<nick> :End of /WHOIS list"
\r 319 RPL_WHOISCHANNELS
\r "<nick> :{[@|+]<channel><space>}"
\r\r - Replies 311 - 313, 317 - 319 are all replies
\r generated in response to a WHOIS message. Given that
\r there are enough parameters present, the answering
\r server must either formulate a reply out of the above
\r numerics (if the query nick is found) or return an
\r error reply. The '*' in RPL_WHOISUSER is there as
\r the literal character and not as a wild card. For
\r each reply set, only RPL_WHOISCHANNELS may appear
\r more than once (for long lists of channel names).
\r The '@' and '+' characters next to the channel name
\r indicate whether a client is a channel operator or
\r has been granted permission to speak on a moderated
\r channel. The RPL_ENDOFWHOIS reply is used to mark
\r the end of processing a WHOIS message.
\r\r 314 RPL_WHOWASUSER
\r "<nick> <user> <host> * :<real name>"
\r 369 RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS
\r "<nick> :End of WHOWAS"
\r\r - When replying to a WHOWAS message, a server must use
\r the replies RPL_WHOWASUSER, RPL_WHOISSERVER or
\r ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK for each nickname in the presented
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 49]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r list. At the end of all reply batches, there must
\r be RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS (even if there was only one reply
\r and it was an error).
\r\r 321 RPL_LISTSTART
\r "Channel :Users Name"
\r 322 RPL_LIST
\r "<channel> <# visible> :<topic>"
\r 323 RPL_LISTEND
\r ":End of /LIST"
\r\r - Replies RPL_LISTSTART, RPL_LIST, RPL_LISTEND mark
\r the start, actual replies with data and end of the
\r server's response to a LIST command. If there are
\r no channels available to return, only the start
\r and end reply must be sent.
\r\r 324 RPL_CHANNELMODEIS
\r "<channel> <mode> <mode params>"
\r\r 331 RPL_NOTOPIC
\r "<channel> :No topic is set"
\r 332 RPL_TOPIC
\r "<channel> :<topic>"
\r\r - When sending a TOPIC message to determine the
\r channel topic, one of two replies is sent. If
\r the topic is set, RPL_TOPIC is sent back else
\r RPL_NOTOPIC.
\r\r 341 RPL_INVITING
\r "<channel> <nick>"
\r\r - Returned by the server to indicate that the
\r attempted INVITE message was successful and is
\r being passed onto the end client.
\r\r 342 RPL_SUMMONING
\r "<user> :Summoning user to IRC"
\r\r - Returned by a server answering a SUMMON message to
\r indicate that it is summoning that user.
\r\r 351 RPL_VERSION
\r "<version>.<debuglevel> <server> :<comments>"
\r\r - Reply by the server showing its version details.
\r The <version> is the version of the software being
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 50]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r used (including any patchlevel revisions) and the
\r <debuglevel> is used to indicate if the server is
\r running in "debug mode".
\r\r The "comments" field may contain any comments about
\r the version or further version details.
\r\r 352 RPL_WHOREPLY
\r "<channel> <user> <host> <server> <nick> \
\r <H|G>[*][@|+] :<hopcount> <real name>"
\r 315 RPL_ENDOFWHO
\r "<name> :End of /WHO list"
\r\r - The RPL_WHOREPLY and RPL_ENDOFWHO pair are used
\r to answer a WHO message. The RPL_WHOREPLY is only
\r sent if there is an appropriate match to the WHO
\r query. If there is a list of parameters supplied
\r with a WHO message, a RPL_ENDOFWHO must be sent
\r after processing each list item with <name> being
\r the item.
\r\r 353 RPL_NAMREPLY
\r "<channel> :[[@|+]<nick> [[@|+]<nick> [...]]]"
\r 366 RPL_ENDOFNAMES
\r "<channel> :End of /NAMES list"
\r\r - To reply to a NAMES message, a reply pair consisting
\r of RPL_NAMREPLY and RPL_ENDOFNAMES is sent by the
\r server back to the client. If there is no channel
\r found as in the query, then only RPL_ENDOFNAMES is
\r returned. The exception to this is when a NAMES
\r message is sent with no parameters and all visible
\r channels and contents are sent back in a series of
\r RPL_NAMEREPLY messages with a RPL_ENDOFNAMES to mark
\r the end.
\r\r 364 RPL_LINKS
\r "<mask> <server> :<hopcount> <server info>"
\r 365 RPL_ENDOFLINKS
\r "<mask> :End of /LINKS list"
\r\r - In replying to the LINKS message, a server must send
\r replies back using the RPL_LINKS numeric and mark the
\r end of the list using an RPL_ENDOFLINKS reply.
\r\r 367 RPL_BANLIST
\r "<channel> <banid>"
\r 368 RPL_ENDOFBANLIST
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 51]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r "<channel> :End of channel ban list"
\r\r - When listing the active 'bans' for a given channel,
\r a server is required to send the list back using the
\r RPL_BANLIST and RPL_ENDOFBANLIST messages. A separate
\r RPL_BANLIST is sent for each active banid. After the
\r banids have been listed (or if none present) a
\r RPL_ENDOFBANLIST must be sent.
\r\r 371 RPL_INFO
\r ":<string>"
\r 374 RPL_ENDOFINFO
\r ":End of /INFO list"
\r\r - A server responding to an INFO message is required to
\r send all its 'info' in a series of RPL_INFO messages
\r with a RPL_ENDOFINFO reply to indicate the end of the
\r replies.
\r\r 375 RPL_MOTDSTART
\r ":- <server> Message of the day - "
\r 372 RPL_MOTD
\r ":- <text>"
\r 376 RPL_ENDOFMOTD
\r ":End of /MOTD command"
\r\r - When responding to the MOTD message and the MOTD file
\r is found, the file is displayed line by line, with
\r each line no longer than 80 characters, using
\r RPL_MOTD format replies. These should be surrounded
\r by a RPL_MOTDSTART (before the RPL_MOTDs) and an
\r RPL_ENDOFMOTD (after).
\r\r 381 RPL_YOUREOPER
\r ":You are now an IRC operator"
\r\r - RPL_YOUREOPER is sent back to a client which has
\r just successfully issued an OPER message and gained
\r operator status.
\r\r 382 RPL_REHASHING
\r "<config file> :Rehashing"
\r\r - If the REHASH option is used and an operator sends
\r a REHASH message, an RPL_REHASHING is sent back to
\r the operator.
\r\r 391 RPL_TIME
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 52]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r "<server> :<string showing server's local time>"
\r\r - When replying to the TIME message, a server must send
\r the reply using the RPL_TIME format above. The string
\r showing the time need only contain the correct day and
\r time there. There is no further requirement for the
\r time string.
\r\r 392 RPL_USERSSTART
\r ":UserID Terminal Host"
\r 393 RPL_USERS
\r ":%-8s %-9s %-8s"
\r 394 RPL_ENDOFUSERS
\r ":End of users"
\r 395 RPL_NOUSERS
\r ":Nobody logged in"
\r\r - If the USERS message is handled by a server, the
\r replies RPL_USERSTART, RPL_USERS, RPL_ENDOFUSERS and
\r RPL_NOUSERS are used. RPL_USERSSTART must be sent
\r first, following by either a sequence of RPL_USERS
\r or a single RPL_NOUSER. Following this is
\r RPL_ENDOFUSERS.
\r\r 200 RPL_TRACELINK
\r "Link <version & debug level> <destination> \
\r <next server>"
\r 201 RPL_TRACECONNECTING
\r "Try. <class> <server>"
\r 202 RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE
\r "H.S. <class> <server>"
\r 203 RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN
\r "???? <class> [<client IP address in dot form>]"
\r 204 RPL_TRACEOPERATOR
\r "Oper <class> <nick>"
\r 205 RPL_TRACEUSER
\r "User <class> <nick>"
\r 206 RPL_TRACESERVER
\r "Serv <class> <int>S <int>C <server> \
\r <nick!user|*!*>@<host|server>"
\r 208 RPL_TRACENEWTYPE
\r "<newtype> 0 <client name>"
\r 261 RPL_TRACELOG
\r "File <logfile> <debug level>"
\r\r - The RPL_TRACE* are all returned by the server in
\r response to the TRACE message. How many are
\r returned is dependent on the the TRACE message and
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 53]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r whether it was sent by an operator or not. There
\r is no predefined order for which occurs first.
\r Replies RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN, RPL_TRACECONNECTING and
\r RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE are all used for connections
\r which have not been fully established and are either
\r unknown, still attempting to connect or in the
\r process of completing the 'server handshake'.
\r RPL_TRACELINK is sent by any server which handles
\r a TRACE message and has to pass it on to another
\r server. The list of RPL_TRACELINKs sent in
\r response to a TRACE command traversing the IRC
\r network should reflect the actual connectivity of
\r the servers themselves along that path.
\r RPL_TRACENEWTYPE is to be used for any connection
\r which does not fit in the other categories but is
\r being displayed anyway.
\r\r 211 RPL_STATSLINKINFO
\r "<linkname> <sendq> <sent messages> \
\r <sent bytes> <received messages> \
\r <received bytes> <time open>"
\r 212 RPL_STATSCOMMANDS
\r "<command> <count>"
\r 213 RPL_STATSCLINE
\r "C <host> * <name> <port> <class>"
\r 214 RPL_STATSNLINE
\r "N <host> * <name> <port> <class>"
\r 215 RPL_STATSILINE
\r "I <host> * <host> <port> <class>"
\r 216 RPL_STATSKLINE
\r "K <host> * <username> <port> <class>"
\r 218 RPL_STATSYLINE
\r "Y <class> <ping frequency> <connect \
\r frequency> <max sendq>"
\r 219 RPL_ENDOFSTATS
\r "<stats letter> :End of /STATS report"
\r 241 RPL_STATSLLINE
\r "L <hostmask> * <servername> <maxdepth>"
\r 242 RPL_STATSUPTIME
\r ":Server Up %d days %d:%02d:%02d"
\r 243 RPL_STATSOLINE
\r "O <hostmask> * <name>"
\r 244 RPL_STATSHLINE
\r "H <hostmask> * <servername>"
\r\r 221 RPL_UMODEIS
\r "<user mode string>"
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 54]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r - To answer a query about a client's own mode,
\r RPL_UMODEIS is sent back.
\r\r 251 RPL_LUSERCLIENT
\r ":There are <integer> users and <integer> \
\r invisible on <integer> servers"
\r 252 RPL_LUSEROP
\r "<integer> :operator(s) online"
\r 253 RPL_LUSERUNKNOWN
\r "<integer> :unknown connection(s)"
\r 254 RPL_LUSERCHANNELS
\r "<integer> :channels formed"
\r 255 RPL_LUSERME
\r ":I have <integer> clients and <integer> \
\r servers"
\r\r - In processing an LUSERS message, the server
\r sends a set of replies from RPL_LUSERCLIENT,
\r RPL_LUSEROP, RPL_USERUNKNOWN,
\r RPL_LUSERCHANNELS and RPL_LUSERME. When
\r replying, a server must send back
\r RPL_LUSERCLIENT and RPL_LUSERME. The other
\r replies are only sent back if a non-zero count
\r is found for them.
\r\r 256 RPL_ADMINME
\r "<server> :Administrative info"
\r 257 RPL_ADMINLOC1
\r ":<admin info>"
\r 258 RPL_ADMINLOC2
\r ":<admin info>"
\r 259 RPL_ADMINEMAIL
\r ":<admin info>"
\r\r - When replying to an ADMIN message, a server
\r is expected to use replies RLP_ADMINME
\r through to RPL_ADMINEMAIL and provide a text
\r message with each. For RPL_ADMINLOC1 a
\r description of what city, state and country
\r the server is in is expected, followed by
\r details of the university and department
\r (RPL_ADMINLOC2) and finally the administrative
\r contact for the server (an email address here
\r is required) in RPL_ADMINEMAIL.
\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 55]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r6.3 Reserved numerics.
\r\r These numerics are not described above since they fall into one of
\r the following categories:
\r\r 1. no longer in use;
\r\r 2. reserved for future planned use;
\r\r 3. in current use but are part of a non-generic 'feature' of
\r the current IRC server.
\r\r 209 RPL_TRACECLASS 217 RPL_STATSQLINE
\r 231 RPL_SERVICEINFO 232 RPL_ENDOFSERVICES
\r 233 RPL_SERVICE 234 RPL_SERVLIST
\r 235 RPL_SERVLISTEND
\r 316 RPL_WHOISCHANOP 361 RPL_KILLDONE
\r 362 RPL_CLOSING 363 RPL_CLOSEEND
\r 373 RPL_INFOSTART 384 RPL_MYPORTIS
\r 466 ERR_YOUWILLBEBANNED 476 ERR_BADCHANMASK
\r 492 ERR_NOSERVICEHOST
\r\r7. Client and server authentication
\r\r Clients and servers are both subject to the same level of
\r authentication. For both, an IP number to hostname lookup (and
\r reverse check on this) is performed for all connections made to the
\r server. Both connections are then subject to a password check (if
\r there is a password set for that connection). These checks are
\r possible on all connections although the password check is only
\r commonly used with servers.
\r\r An additional check that is becoming of more and more common is that
\r of the username responsible for making the connection. Finding the
\r username of the other end of the connection typically involves
\r connecting to an authentication server such as IDENT as described in
\r RFC 1413.
\r\r Given that without passwords it is not easy to reliably determine who
\r is on the other end of a network connection, use of passwords is
\r strongly recommended on inter-server connections in addition to any
\r other measures such as using an ident server.
\r\r8. Current implementations
\r\r The only current implementation of this protocol is the IRC server,
\r version 2.8. Earlier versions may implement some or all of the
\r commands described by this document with NOTICE messages replacing
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 56]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r many of the numeric replies. Unfortunately, due to backward
\r compatibility requirements, the implementation of some parts of this
\r document varies with what is laid out. On notable difference is:
\r\r * recognition that any LF or CR anywhere in a message marks the
\r end of that message (instead of requiring CR-LF);
\r\r The rest of this section deals with issues that are mostly of
\r importance to those who wish to implement a server but some parts
\r also apply directly to clients as well.
\r\r8.1 Network protocol: TCP - why it is best used here.
\r\r IRC has been implemented on top of TCP since TCP supplies a reliable
\r network protocol which is well suited to this scale of conferencing.
\r The use of multicast IP is an alternative, but it is not widely
\r available or supported at the present time.
\r\r8.1.1 Support of Unix sockets
\r\r Given that Unix domain sockets allow listen/connect operations, the
\r current implementation can be configured to listen and accept both
\r client and server connections on a Unix domain socket. These are
\r recognized as sockets where the hostname starts with a '/'.
\r\r When providing any information about the connections on a Unix domain
\r socket, the server is required to supplant the actual hostname in
\r place of the pathname unless the actual socket name is being asked
\r for.
\r\r8.2 Command Parsing
\r\r To provide useful 'non-buffered' network IO for clients and servers,
\r each connection is given its own private 'input buffer' in which the
\r results of the most recent read and parsing are kept. A buffer size
\r of 512 bytes is used so as to hold 1 full message, although, this
\r will usually hold several commands. The private buffer is parsed
\r after every read operation for valid messages. When dealing with
\r multiple messages from one client in the buffer, care should be taken
\r in case one happens to cause the client to be 'removed'.
\r\r8.3 Message delivery
\r\r It is common to find network links saturated or hosts to which you
\r are sending data unable to send data. Although Unix typically
\r handles this through the TCP window and internal buffers, the server
\r often has large amounts of data to send (especially when a new
\r server-server link forms) and the small buffers provided in the
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 57]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r kernel are not enough for the outgoing queue. To alleviate this
\r problem, a "send queue" is used as a FIFO queue for data to be sent.
\r A typical "send queue" may grow to 200 Kbytes on a large IRC network
\r with a slow network connection when a new server connects.
\r\r When polling its connections, a server will first read and parse all
\r incoming data, queuing any data to be sent out. When all available
\r input is processed, the queued data is sent. This reduces the number
\r of write() system calls and helps TCP make bigger packets.
\r\r8.4 Connection 'Liveness'
\r\r To detect when a connection has died or become unresponsive, the
\r server must ping each of its connections that it doesn't get a
\r response from in a given amount of time.
\r\r If a connection doesn't respond in time, its connection is closed
\r using the appropriate procedures. A connection is also dropped if
\r its sendq grows beyond the maximum allowed, because it is better to
\r close a slow connection than have a server process block.
\r\r8.5 Establishing a server to client connection
\r\r Upon connecting to an IRC server, a client is sent the MOTD (if
\r present) as well as the current user/server count (as per the LUSER
\r command). The server is also required to give an unambiguous message
\r to the client which states its name and version as well as any other
\r introductory messages which may be deemed appropriate.
\r\r After dealing with this, the server must then send out the new user's
\r nickname and other information as supplied by itself (USER command)
\r and as the server could discover (from DNS/authentication servers).
\r The server must send this information out with NICK first followed by
\r USER.
\r\r8.6 Establishing a server-server connection.
\r\r The process of establishing of a server-to-server connection is
\r fraught with danger since there are many possible areas where
\r problems can occur - the least of which are race conditions.
\r\r After a server has received a connection following by a PASS/SERVER
\r pair which were recognised as being valid, the server should then
\r reply with its own PASS/SERVER information for that connection as
\r well as all of the other state information it knows about as
\r described below.
\r\r When the initiating server receives a PASS/SERVER pair, it too then
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 58]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r checks that the server responding is authenticated properly before
\r accepting the connection to be that server.
\r\r8.6.1 Server exchange of state information when connecting
\r\r The order of state information being exchanged between servers is
\r essential. The required order is as follows:
\r\r * all known other servers;
\r\r * all known user information;
\r\r * all known channel information.
\r\r Information regarding servers is sent via extra SERVER messages, user
\r information with NICK/USER/MODE/JOIN messages and channels with MODE
\r messages.
\r\r NOTE: channel topics are *NOT* exchanged here because the TOPIC
\r command overwrites any old topic information, so at best, the two
\r sides of the connection would exchange topics.
\r\r By passing the state information about servers first, any collisions
\r with servers that already exist occur before nickname collisions due
\r to a second server introducing a particular nickname. Due to the IRC
\r network only being able to exist as an acyclic graph, it may be
\r possible that the network has already reconnected in another
\r location, the place where the collision occurs indicating where the
\r net needs to split.
\r\r8.7 Terminating server-client connections
\r\r When a client connection closes, a QUIT message is generated on
\r behalf of the client by the server to which the client connected. No
\r other message is to be generated or used.
\r\r8.8 Terminating server-server connections
\r\r If a server-server connection is closed, either via a remotely
\r generated SQUIT or 'natural' causes, the rest of the connected IRC
\r network must have its information updated with by the server which
\r detected the closure. The server then sends a list of SQUITs (one
\r for each server behind that connection) and a list of QUITs (again,
\r one for each client behind that connection).
\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 59]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r8.9 Tracking nickname changes
\r\r All IRC servers are required to keep a history of recent nickname
\r changes. This is required to allow the server to have a chance of
\r keeping in touch of things when nick-change race conditions occur
\r with commands which manipulate them. Commands which must trace nick
\r changes are:
\r\r * KILL (the nick being killed)
\r\r * MODE (+/- o,v)
\r\r * KICK (the nick being kicked)
\r\r No other commands are to have nick changes checked for.
\r\r In the above cases, the server is required to first check for the
\r existence of the nickname, then check its history to see who that
\r nick currently belongs to (if anyone!). This reduces the chances of
\r race conditions but they can still occur with the server ending up
\r affecting the wrong client. When performing a change trace for an
\r above command it is recommended that a time range be given and
\r entries which are too old ignored.
\r\r For a reasonable history, a server should be able to keep previous
\r nickname for every client it knows about if they all decided to
\r change. This size is limited by other factors (such as memory, etc).
\r\r8.10 Flood control of clients
\r\r With a large network of interconnected IRC servers, it is quite easy
\r for any single client attached to the network to supply a continuous
\r stream of messages that result in not only flooding the network, but
\r also degrading the level of service provided to others. Rather than
\r require every 'victim' to be provide their own protection, flood
\r protection was written into the server and is applied to all clients
\r except services. The current algorithm is as follows:
\r\r * check to see if client's `message timer' is less than
\r current time (set to be equal if it is);
\r\r * read any data present from the client;
\r\r * while the timer is less than ten seconds ahead of the current
\r time, parse any present messages and penalize the client by
\r 2 seconds for each message;
\r\r which in essence means that the client may send 1 message every 2
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 60]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r seconds without being adversely affected.
\r\r8.11 Non-blocking lookups
\r\r In a real-time environment, it is essential that a server process do
\r as little waiting as possible so that all the clients are serviced
\r fairly. Obviously this requires non-blocking IO on all network
\r read/write operations. For normal server connections, this was not
\r difficult, but there are other support operations that may cause the
\r server to block (such as disk reads). Where possible, such activity
\r should be performed with a short timeout.
\r\r8.11.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups
\r\r Using the standard resolver libraries from Berkeley and others has
\r meant large delays in some cases where replies have timed out. To
\r avoid this, a separate set of DNS routines were written which were
\r setup for non-blocking IO operations and then polled from within the
\r main server IO loop.
\r\r8.11.2 Username (Ident) lookups
\r\r Although there are numerous ident libraries for use and inclusion
\r into other programs, these caused problems since they operated in a
\r synchronous manner and resulted in frequent delays. Again the
\r solution was to write a set of routines which would cooperate with
\r the rest of the server and work using non-blocking IO.
\r\r8.12 Configuration File
\r\r To provide a flexible way of setting up and running the server, it is
\r recommended that a configuration file be used which contains
\r instructions to the server on the following:
\r\r * which hosts to accept client connections from;
\r\r * which hosts to allow to connect as servers;
\r\r * which hosts to connect to (both actively and
\r passively);
\r\r * information about where the server is (university,
\r city/state, company are examples of this);
\r\r * who is responsible for the server and an email address
\r at which they can be contacted;
\r\r * hostnames and passwords for clients which wish to be given
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 61]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r access to restricted operator commands.
\r\r In specifying hostnames, both domain names and use of the 'dot'
\r notation (127.0.0.1) should both be accepted. It must be possible to
\r specify the password to be used/accepted for all outgoing and
\r incoming connections (although the only outgoing connections are
\r those to other servers).
\r\r The above list is the minimum requirement for any server which wishes
\r to make a connection with another server. Other items which may be
\r of use are:
\r\r * specifying which servers other server may introduce;
\r\r * how deep a server branch is allowed to become;
\r\r * hours during which clients may connect.
\r\r8.12.1 Allowing clients to connect
\r\r A server should use some sort of 'access control list' (either in the
\r configuration file or elsewhere) that is read at startup and used to
\r decide what hosts clients may use to connect to it.
\r\r Both 'deny' and 'allow' should be implemented to provide the required
\r flexibility for host access control.
\r\r8.12.2 Operators
\r\r The granting of operator privileges to a disruptive person can have
\r dire consequences for the well-being of the IRC net in general due to
\r the powers given to them. Thus, the acquisition of such powers
\r should not be very easy. The current setup requires two 'passwords'
\r to be used although one of them is usually easy guessed. Storage of
\r oper passwords in configuration files is preferable to hard coding
\r them in and should be stored in a crypted format (ie using crypt(3)
\r from Unix) to prevent easy theft.
\r\r8.12.3 Allowing servers to connect
\r\r The interconnection of server is not a trivial matter: a bad
\r connection can have a large impact on the usefulness of IRC. Thus,
\r each server should have a list of servers to which it may connect and
\r which servers may connect to it. Under no circumstances should a
\r server allow an arbitrary host to connect as a server. In addition
\r to which servers may and may not connect, the configuration file
\r should also store the password and other characteristics of that
\r link.
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 62]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r8.12.4 Administrivia
\r\r To provide accurate and valid replies to the ADMIN command (see
\r section 4.3.7), the server should find the relevant details in the
\r configuration.
\r\r8.13 Channel membership
\r\r The current server allows any registered local user to join upto 10
\r different channels. There is no limit imposed on non-local users so
\r that the server remains (reasonably) consistant with all others on a
\r channel membership basis
\r\r9. Current problems
\r\r There are a number of recognized problems with this protocol, all of
\r which hope to be solved sometime in the near future during its
\r rewrite. Currently, work is underway to find working solutions to
\r these problems.
\r\r9.1 Scalability
\r\r It is widely recognized that this protocol does not scale
\r sufficiently well when used in a large arena. The main problem comes
\r from the requirement that all servers know about all other servers
\r and users and that information regarding them be updated as soon as
\r it changes. It is also desirable to keep the number of servers low
\r so that the path length between any two points is kept minimal and
\r the spanning tree as strongly branched as possible.
\r\r9.2 Labels
\r\r The current IRC protocol has 3 types of labels: the nickname, the
\r channel name and the server name. Each of the three types has its
\r own domain and no duplicates are allowed inside that domain.
\r Currently, it is possible for users to pick the label for any of the
\r three, resulting in collisions. It is widely recognized that this
\r needs reworking, with a plan for unique names for channels and nicks
\r that don't collide being desirable as well as a solution allowing a
\r cyclic tree.
\r\r9.2.1 Nicknames
\r\r The idea of the nickname on IRC is very convenient for users to use
\r when talking to each other outside of a channel, but there is only a
\r finite nickname space and being what they are, its not uncommon for
\r several people to want to use the same nick. If a nickname is chosen
\r by two people using this protocol, either one will not succeed or
\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 63]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\r both will removed by use of KILL (4.6.1).
\r\r9.2.2 Channels
\r\r The current channel layout requires that all servers know about all
\r channels, their inhabitants and properties. Besides not scaling
\r well, the issue of privacy is also a concern. A collision of
\r channels is treated as an inclusive event (both people who create the
\r new channel are considered to be members of it) rather than an
\r exclusive one such as used to solve nickname collisions.
\r\r9.2.3 Servers
\r\r Although the number of servers is usually small relative to the
\r number of users and channels, they two currently required to be known
\r globally, either each one separately or hidden behind a mask.
\r\r9.3 Algorithms
\r\r In some places within the server code, it has not been possible to
\r avoid N^2 algorithms such as checking the channel list of a set
\r of clients.
\r\r In current server versions, there are no database consistency checks,
\r each server assumes that a neighbouring server is correct. This
\r opens the door to large problems if a connecting server is buggy or
\r otherwise tries to introduce contradictions to the existing net.
\r\r Currently, because of the lack of unique internal and global labels,
\r there are a multitude of race conditions that exist. These race
\r conditions generally arise from the problem of it taking time for
\r messages to traverse and effect the IRC network. Even by changing to
\r unique labels, there are problems with channel-related commands being
\r disrupted.
\r\r10. Current support and availability
\r\r Mailing lists for IRC related discussion:
\r Future protocol: ircd-three-request@eff.org
\r General discussion: operlist-request@eff.org
\r\r Software implemenations
\r cs.bu.edu:/irc
\r nic.funet.fi:/pub/irc
\r coombs.anu.edu.au:/pub/irc
\r\r Newsgroup: alt.irc
\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 64]
\r\f\rRFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993
\r\r\rSecurity Considerations
\r\r Security issues are discussed in sections 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.1.3, 5.5, and
\r 7.
\r\r12. Authors' Addresses
\r\r Jarkko Oikarinen
\r Tuirantie 17 as 9
\r 90500 OULU
\r FINLAND
\r\r Email: jto@tolsun.oulu.fi
\r\r\r Darren Reed
\r 4 Pateman Street
\r Watsonia, Victoria 3087
\r Australia
\r\r Email: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au
\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\rOikarinen & Reed [Page 65]
\r\f\ No newline at end of file
projects / user / henk / code / inspircd.git / blobdiff