X-Git-Url: https://git.netwichtig.de/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=dnslists.otl;h=a15f0dc229787f4978f9a0cd2e51867a63950d67;hb=251dd5d3a17ed6cde47c5e2c0ebd8d28a3fc8634;hp=97763e43204c058a5c04c1d09b02d906a519baf6;hpb=a339125a540e9f8605a50d30ea95faf36cef290a;p=user%2Fhenk%2Fdocs%2Fdnsbl_notes.git diff --git a/dnslists.otl b/dnslists.otl index 97763e4..a15f0dc 100644 --- a/dnslists.otl +++ b/dnslists.otl @@ -8,13 +8,6 @@ TODO implement in exim implement in SA implement in rspamd -implement - https://abuse.ro/ - policy - spamtraps - The last IP address before destination in the email headers is listed into rbl.abuse.ro list. - Sender domains are analyzed and if confirmed to be not spoofed, are listed into dbl.abuse.ro list - Spamvertized domains (including those indirectly linked through services like bit.ly) are listed into uribl.abuse.ro list 00_META https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amispammer/+bug/835614 http://www.blalert.com/dnsbls @@ -30,6 +23,7 @@ implement https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/sections/204468388-Blocklists https://github.com/zbetcheckin/DNSBLs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_blacklists + https://www.impressionwise.com/kb/threats/rbl-advisories.html 00_ELANG http://dnsbl.aspnet.hu/ hungarian? @@ -189,6 +183,44 @@ implement http://blacklist.woody.ch/ no entries in the displayed "top 100" may have been absorbed into the swinog blacklists, see antispam.imp.ch + http://cbl.abuseat.org/ + https://www.abuseat.org/ + changes to the CBL that occured in January 2021. In short, the CBL infrastructure was replaced by the Spamhaus XBL structure + http://dnsbl.burnt-tech.com/ + domain is for sale + http://rbl.dns-servicios.com/rbl.php + website can not be found + http://spamcannibal.org/ + dead, as of at least 2018 + http://st.technovision.dk/ + https://docs.hetrixtools.com/st-technovision-dk-inactive-removed/ + [December 8, 2021] This RBL has stopped responding to DNS queries. + http://spamstinks.com/ + cert is for generic hostname + website shows some login form + http://virbl.bit.nl/ + https://www.rollernet.us/2017/01/shutdown-of-virbl-dnsbl-bit-nl/ + January 23, 2017: »The Virbl-project site has been replaced by this static message to inform those that find their ways here. The Virbl DNSBL-zone was emptied and will be removed all together at a moment further on in the future.« + http://www.blocklist.de/en/index.html + lots of timeouts as of 2023 + forum link is dead, among others + seems unmaintained but alive + latest news is from 2016 + latest blog entry from 2022 + Abusix, a network security company for mail security and abuse report handling, takes over blocklist.de to integrate it within its Abusix platform to further improve its data quality. + http://www.emailbasura.org/cgi-bin/emailbasura-ini.pl?lang=eng + placeholder/parked? + http://www.leadmon.net/spamguard/ + website times out + http://www.srntools.com/blacklist/ + redirects to comodo.com subdomain where I can’t find any information about a DNSBL + https://bl.konstant.no/ + https://docs.hetrixtools.com/bl-konstant-no-unresponsive-removed/ + [July 29, 2022] This RBL has become unresponsive, and we’ve removed it from our system until it returns to functioning normally again. + https://www.megarbl.net/ + connection times out + https://www.blalert.com/dnsbl/rbl.megarbl.net + »This blacklist is marked as inactive and is not being checked at the moment. We will be tracking it to see if it goes to normal again.« 00_NEEDS_RECHECK https://antispam.imp.ch/ no usage policy @@ -209,6 +241,22 @@ implement http://blacklist.woody.ch/rblcheck.php3 dead? waiting for feedback + http://dnsbl.iip.lu/ + https://docs.hetrixtools.com/lookup-dnsbl-iip-lu-false-positive-removed/ + in 2016: lookup.dnsbl.iip.lu blacklist started issuing false positive responses and upon further investigation looks to be abandoned/dead. + https://www.blalert.com/dnsbl/lookup.dnsbl.iip.lu + This blacklist is marked as "shut down" and non-operational as of 2017-12-31. + http://dnsbl.inps.de/ + timeout + https://www.dnsbl.com/search/label/dnsbl.inps.de + Today, May 25, 2020, he has announced that it is shutting down, due to concerns around GDPR and personal challenges brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. + https://docs.hetrixtools.com/dnsbl-inps-de-removed-from-our-system/ + [May 29,2018] IPv4 RBL dnsbl.inps.de has been removed from our system, as they have decided to discontinue the RBL project for the time being. + https://glockapps.com/blacklist/dnsbl-inps-de/ + Today, May 25, 2020, he has announced that it is shutting down, due to concerns around GDPR and personal challenges brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. + https://www.dnsbl.info/dnsbl-details.php?dnsbl=dnsbl.inps.de + This blacklist is offline as of May 1, 2020. + https://web.archive.org/web/20220428013500/http://www.inps.de/ 00_NEEDS_RESEARCH bl.tiopan.com blocked.hilli.dk @@ -245,6 +293,24 @@ implement 00_E_EVIL sbl.nszones.com http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/statement/008/fake-dnsbl-uncovered-nszones.com + http://www.backscatterer.org/ + questionable policy - pay for (quicker) delisting + https://support.hornetsecurity.com/hc/en-us/articles/360011880797-Why-are-Hornetsecurity-IP-addresses-listed-at-Backscatterer- + as of December 29, 2021: »The removal at the blacklist backscatterer.org can only be done for a fee« + https://www.warmy.io/blog/backscatterer-blacklist-how-to-remove-your-ip-from-it + in March 17, 2023 does not mention need to pay + https://support.forcepoint.com/s/article/Forcepoint-IP-s-blocklisted-by-UCEProtect-and-Backscatterer-org + recommend against using it + https://whatismyipaddress.com/backscatterer + mentions strict delisting process and "express delisting" but nothing further + https://bobcares.com/blog/backscatterer-blacklist/ + goes through the process with screenshots showing express delisting for 109$ + https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/issues-with-www-backscatterer-org-any-one/td-p/1298377 + more opinions + https://www.titanhq.com/blog/warning-ignore-pay-for-de-listing-blacklist-service/ + Jan 17th, 2020: »UCEProtect also charges a delisting fee. TitanHQ discourages email administrators from using the UCEProtect blacklist and we do not recommend paying for list removal« + https://web.archive.org/web/20150320180344/http://www.jvfconsulting.com/blog/130/Backscatterer_Network_Spam_List_Is_Another_UCEPROTECT_Extortion_Scam.html + another opinion 00_E_INFORMATION blacklist.sci.kun.nl https://cncz.science.ru.nl/en/howto/email-spam/ @@ -285,6 +351,33 @@ implement https://docs.trendmicro.com/en-us/enterprise/email-reputation-services-online-help/getting-started_001/configuring-email-re/creating-an-account.aspx »If you don’t create an account, you can still query the reputation of an IP address« I don’t find any pricing or usage information + http://dnsbl.tornevall.org/ + https://www.tornevall.net/ + related to https://www.fraudbl.org/ + seems a bit unstructured and not very well documented + I can’t be arsed to deal with confluence slowing my browser to a halt repeatedly and it’s really hard to navigate but there seems to be some information on https://docs.tornevall.net/display/TORNEVALL/Endpoint%3A+dnsbl+-+DNSBL+v5+with+API+v3 + seems active + http://rbl.schulte.org/ + seems active + listing policy seems to be: they received spam from an IP + usage policy: Anyone can use this RBL list [sic] + return codes: probably boolean, i.e. either listed or not + http://relaytest.kundenserver.de/ + by 1und1 (now ionos?), used internally + https://www.blalert.com/dnsbl/relays.bl.kundenserver.de + no usage policy found + no listing policy found + no return code explanation found + http://www.blockedservers.com/ + no usage policy + no listing policy + no documentation + "funny": + No rights given; all rights are in the dumpster; Copyleft 2012 - 3013 - page generated in 0.009843111038208 secs + https://choon.net/dnsbl.php + no usage policy or instructions + no listing policy + only automatic delisting after 30 days 00_E_PAID 00_E_PRIVATE 88.blacklist.zap @@ -434,6 +527,10 @@ implement 00_LISTS_OPENRESOLVERS 00_LISTS_TORNODES https://www.dan.me.uk/dnsbl + http://rbl.efnetrbl.org/ + aka http://tor.efnet.org/ + lists IPs + lists open proxies, infected machines, tornodes, etc. https://0spam.org/ clear information on usage policy Nothing. The 0Spam Project is absolutely free for email providers, IT professionals and general removal request. @@ -444,75 +541,115 @@ implement nbl.0spam.org Network Black List | Spam Source Networks, high volume of spam trap hits in a Class C block will result in network listings in this DNSBL. url.0spam.org URL Black List | This list contains the IP address of domains found to be in the source of spam emails found in our traps. return codes not very clear - http://cbl.abuseat.org/ - http://dnsbl.burnt-tech.com/ - http://dnsbl.iip.lu/ - http://dnsbl.inps.de/ - http://dnsbl.tornevall.org/ + https://abuse.ro/ + policy + spamtraps + The last IP address before destination in the email headers is listed into rbl.abuse.ro list. + Sender domains are analyzed and if confirmed to be not spoofed, are listed into dbl.abuse.ro list + Spamvertized domains (including those indirectly linked through services like bit.ly) are listed into uribl.abuse.ro list http://dronebl.org/ - http://mailspike.net/usage.html + usage policy is clear: free for whatever + listing policy is not quite so clear + can be mostly inferred from the classes but not entirely clear IMHO + has an IRC channel + return codes + not explicitly mentioned but it’s 127.0.0.X where X is the class from https://dronebl.org/classes http://psbl.org/ query zone: psbl.surriel.com - http://rbl.dns-servicios.com/rbl.php - http://rbl.schulte.org/ + no usage policy, but seems implied that usage is free + listing policy + no explicit, complete policy given but sending to spamtraps is mentioned to get you listed and seems the exclusive mechanism + return codes + not documented, probably only boolean http://rbldata.interserver.net/ - may be dead: http://www.blalert.com/dnsbl/rbl.interserver.net - http://relaytest.kundenserver.de/ + listing policy more or less clear + usage policy not given but since usage is explained it’s probably free for all + return codes seem to be binary, i.e. either listed or not + lists IPs + lists domains/URIs http://rv-soft.info/ - http://spamcannibal.org/dnsbl_check.shtml + usage policy not explicit but seems to be free + listing policy also not explicit but can be inferred from return code explanation + return codes are explained http://spamrats.com/ - http://spamstinks.com/ - http://st.technovision.dk/ - http://tor.efnet.org/ - http://rbl.efnetrbl.org/ MIRROR + clear usage policy (ToS) + listing policies documented + return codes of aggregated list documented + lists IPs http://v4bl.org/ - http://virbl.bit.nl/ + usage policy documented + listing policy not really clear + return codes documented http://wpbl.info/ + listing procedure is documented + usage policy implied: free to use + return codes documented http://www.aupads.org/ - http://www.backscatterer.org/ - fragwuerdige policy - bezahlen fuer schnelleres delisting - http://www.blockedservers.com/ - http://www.blocklist.de/en/index.html - http://www.emailbasura.org/cgi-bin/emailbasura-ini.pl?lang=eng + aka www.antispam-ufrj.pads.ufrj.br + aka www.orve.org + listing policy more or less clear + lists IPs and FQDNs + usage policy seems clear: freely exported by anybody who wants to use them« http://www.gbudb.com/truncate/ + listing policy + usage policy seems implied: free use + return codes documented + »Truncate is very conservative. On most systems it can be safely used to reject connections!« http://www.justspam.org/ + listing policy documented + warning: relies on listings in other DNSBLs! also for delisting! + usage policy clear + return codes: binary http://www.kempt.net/dnsbl/ - http://www.leadmon.net/spamguard/ - http://www.rbl.jp/allrbl-e.html + listing policy documented + usage policy documented + return codes undocumented http://www.spamcop.net/ - good policy + listing policy documented + The SCBL is aggressive and often errs on the side of blocking mail + usage policy is: free good reputation + return codes documented http://www.spamsources.fabel.dk/ - sensible policy - http://www.srntools.com/blacklist/ + usage policy is: free + listing policy seems clear + lists IPs http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php - http://www.usenix.org.uk/content/rbl.html - http://zapbl.net/ - https://bl.konstant.no/ - https://choon.net/rbl.php - https://puck.nether.net/or/ - might be good - https://rbl.foobar.hu/ + takes money for faster delisting + listing policy is documented + usage policy is documented: free + a lot of drama + https://www.heise.de/hintergrund/Spam-Golem-291396.html + german + also see comments + https://news.admin.net-abuse.email.narkive.com/boJTu7JC/claus-v-wolfhausen-harasement + https://www.linode.com/community/questions/2324/uceprotectnet-has-us-blacklisted + https://uceprotect.wtf/ + https://www.aaroncake.net/misc/showthought.asp?thought=57 + https://www.dnsbl.com/search/label/claus%20v.%20wolfhausen + https://wordtothewise.com/2018/06/another-day-another-dead-blacklist/ + https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2170592-uceprotect-blacklist-scam + http://kontech.net/uceprotect-blacklist-scheme-2020/ + http://www.whitelisted.org/ + paid subscription + policy on site + related to uceprotect, see there https://www.abuse.ch/ https://www.abuse.ch/?tag=httpbl https://www.kisarbl.or.kr/ - https://www.megarbl.net/ https://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/dns.html + good reputation + lists IPs + does not list spammers but bogons + clear listing policy + usage policy not quite clear ATM + return codes documented: binary http://mailspike.net/usage.html reputation-based - http://www.spamhauswhitelist.com/en/ - policies for listing and usage on the website - http://www.whitelisted.org/ - paid subscription - policy on site https://puck.nether.net/or/ policies on website - https://rbl.foobar.hu/ - usage and listing policies on website http://www.isipp.com/email-accreditation/iadb-query-instruction/ requires signup - https://choon.net/rbl.php not quite a usage policy, but seems ok strange split of ipv4 and ipv6 seems dead? - https://www.dnswl.org/