void WriteOpers(char* text, ...);
void do_log(int level, char *text, ...);
-int common_channels(userrec *u, userrec *u2);
int isnick(const char *n);
chanrec* FindChan(const char* chan);
void readfile(file_cache &F, const char* fname);
#include "users.h"
#include "channels.h"
-int common_channels(userrec *u, userrec *u2);
void Blocking(int s);
void NonBlocking(int s);
int c_count(userrec* u);
*/
virtual void Log(int level, const std::string &s);
- /** Returns true if two users share a common channel.
- * This method is used internally by the NICK and QUIT commands, and the Server::SendCommon
- * method.
- */
- virtual bool CommonChannels(userrec* u1, userrec* u2);
-
/** Returns true if a nick is valid.
* Nicks for unregistered connections will return false.
*/
*/
void WriteCommonExcept(const std::string &text);
- void userrec::WriteWallOps(const char* text, ...);
+ void WriteWallOps(const char* text, ...);
- void userrec::WriteWallOps(const std::string &text);
+ void WriteWallOps(const std::string &text);
+
+ bool SharesChannelWith(userrec *other);
/** Default destructor
*/
extern time_t TIME;
extern ServerConfig* Config;
-/* return 0 or 1 depending if users u and u2 share one or more common channels
- * (used by QUIT, NICK etc which arent channel specific notices)
- *
- * The old algorithm in 1.0 for this was relatively inefficient, iterating over
- * the first users channels then the second users channels within the outer loop,
- * therefore it was a maximum of x*y iterations (upon returning 0 and checking
- * all possible iterations). However this new function instead checks against the
- * channel's userlist in the inner loop which is a std::map<userrec*,userrec*>
- * and saves us time as we already know what pointer value we are after.
- * Don't quote me on the maths as i am not a mathematician or computer scientist,
- * but i believe this algorithm is now x+(log y) maximum iterations instead.
- */
-int common_channels(userrec *u, userrec *u2)
-{
- if ((!u) || (!u2) || (u->registered != REG_ALL) || (u2->registered != REG_ALL))
- return 0;
-
- /* Outer loop */
- for (std::vector<ucrec*>::const_iterator i = u->chans.begin(); i != u->chans.end(); i++)
- {
- /* Fetch the channel from the user */
- ucrec* user_channel = *i;
-
- if (user_channel->channel)
- {
- /* Eliminate the inner loop (which used to be ~equal in size to the outer loop)
- * by replacing it with a map::find which *should* be more efficient
- */
- if (user_channel->channel->HasUser(u2))
- return 1;
- }
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
void Blocking(int s)
{
int flags = fcntl(s, F_GETFL, 0);
ServerInstance->ModeGrok->Process(parameters,pcnt,user,true);
}
-bool Server::CommonChannels(userrec* u1, userrec* u2)
-{
- return (common_channels(u1,u2) != 0);
-}
-
void Server::DumpText(userrec* User, const std::string &LinePrefix, stringstream &TextStream)
{
std::string CompleteLine = LinePrefix;
this->WriteWallOps(std::string(textbuffer));
}
+/* return 0 or 1 depending if users u and u2 share one or more common channels
+ * (used by QUIT, NICK etc which arent channel specific notices)
+ *
+ * The old algorithm in 1.0 for this was relatively inefficient, iterating over
+ * the first users channels then the second users channels within the outer loop,
+ * therefore it was a maximum of x*y iterations (upon returning 0 and checking
+ * all possible iterations). However this new function instead checks against the
+ * channel's userlist in the inner loop which is a std::map<userrec*,userrec*>
+ * and saves us time as we already know what pointer value we are after.
+ * Don't quote me on the maths as i am not a mathematician or computer scientist,
+ * but i believe this algorithm is now x+(log y) maximum iterations instead.
+ */
+bool userrec::SharesChannelWith(userrec *other)
+{
+ if ((!other) || (this->registered != REG_ALL) || (other->registered != REG_ALL))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Outer loop */
+ for (std::vector<ucrec*>::const_iterator i = this->chans.begin(); i != this->chans.end(); i++)
+ {
+ /* Fetch the channel from the user */
+ ucrec* user_channel = *i;
+
+ if (user_channel->channel)
+ {
+ /* Eliminate the inner loop (which used to be ~equal in size to the outer loop)
+ * by replacing it with a map::find which *should* be more efficient
+ */
+ if (user_channel->channel->HasUser(other))
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
+}